Oligometastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: the role of image-guided thermal ablation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of image-guided ablation of liver and lung metastases from adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). METHODS: Patients with oligometastatic ACC (liver and lung metastases) who underwent image-guided ablation were retrospectively included in the study. Complete ablation (CA) at the first contrast-enhanced CT control, local tumor progression (LTP), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), liver disease-free survival (LDFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Correlation between outcomes and other prognostic factors (including Ki67, hormonal secretion, and progression-free survival after primary tumor resection (PR-PFS)) was also analyzed. Kaplan-Meier methods, log-rank tests, and Spearman correlation models were applied. RESULTS: Thirty-two ACC metastases (4 lung and 28 liver) from 16 patients (10 females; mean age 41 years) were treated with RFA or MWA. A single major adverse event was observed (intrahepatic hematoma with subsequent right hemothorax). One patient (2 lesions) was lost to follow-up. CA was obtained in 97% (29/30). During follow-up, LTP was registered in 7/29 cases (24.1%), with a median LTPFS of 21 months (± 12.6). Metastasis size was significantly higher in case of LTP (20 mm vs. 34.5 mm; p = 0.009) and was an independent predictive factor of local tumor control with an AUC of 0.934 (p = 0.0009). Hepatic progression was observed in 66% of the cases, with a median LDFS of 25 months. Median OS was 48.6 months. PR-PFS and hormonal secretion were independent predictors of OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided ablation achieves adequate local tumor control of ACC liver and lung metastases, providing a safe and effective treatment option in the multidisciplinary management of the oligometastatic ACC. KEY POINTS: • Image-guided ablation allows adequate local tumor control in the oligometastatic adrenocortical carcinoma setting. • After percutaneous thermal ablation, complete ablation was achieved in 29 out of 30 lesions (97%). • Lesion size together with primary resection disease-free survival and hormonal secretion play a significant role in determining outcomes.

Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer Management: A Survey of the Italian College of Interventional Radiology.

AIM: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (NCCN) have recently included interventional procedures among the standard treatments for the management of colorectal cancer (CRC) oligometastatic disease (OMD). This study overviews the practice of Interventional Radiology (IR) in Italian centers. METHODS: A practice focused questionnaire on locoregional treatments of CRC-OMD was submitted to all Italian IR centers to assess practice patterns. RESULTS: Thirty-three IR centers completed the questionnaire. The majority reported practice was established within a tumor board (97%), which included input from hepatobiliary surgery (94%). When considering the number of percutaneous ablation and liver-directed trans-arterial therapies performed for all tumor types, 33.5% and 13.4% were performed to specifically treat CRC-OMD. Lung ablations for CRC OMD were performed in 45.5% of centers. Regarding liver ablation, The most common technology was the microwave ablation (68.1%), which was typically performed under US guidance (78%) with conscious sedation used as the most common anaesthesia method (81%). While indication for percutaneous IR treatments was heterogeneous, 51% were performed in combination with chemotherapy in unresectable OMD. Despite new ESMO and NCCN guidelines, 59% of centers did not subjectively appreciate any change in the perception of IR treatments by other specialists; however, 63%of respondents believe that IR will have a more relevant role in the CRC-OMD management in the future. CONCLUSION: CRC-OMD treatment represents a relevant part of the everyday clinical practice of the IR Italian centers with promising future prospects. Heterogeneity persists in clinical indications, requiring more robust evidence to set indications and to diffuse clinical applications.