EFFECT OF PROBIOTIC ORAL ADMINISTRATION ON SKIN WOUND HEALING IN RATS.

BACKGROUND: Manipulating intestinal microbiota with probiotics might stimulate skin response. Understanding all stages of the healing process, as well as the gut-skin-healing response can improve the skin healing process. AIM: To evaluate the effect of perioperative oral administration of probiotics on the healing of skin wounds in rats. METHODS: Seventy-two Wistar male adult rats were weighed and divided into two groups with 36 each, one control group (supplemented with oral maltodextrin 250 mg/day) and one probiotic group (supplemented with Lactobacillus paracasei LPC-37, Bifidobacterium lactis HN0019, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001, Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® at a dose of 250 mg/day), both given orally daily for 15 days. The two groups were subsequently divided into three subgroups according to the moment of euthanasia: in the 3rd, 7th and 10th postoperative days. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in weight in both groups. Wound contraction was faster in probiotic group when compared to the controls, resulting in smaller wound area in the 7th postoperative day. As for histological aspects, the overall H&E score was lower in the probiotic group. The probiotic group showed increased fibrosis from 3rd to the 7th postoperative day. The type I collagen production was higher in the probiotic group at the 10th postoperative day, and the type III collagen increased in the 7th. CONCLUSION: The perioperative use of orally administrated probiotic was associated with a faster reduction of the wound area in rats probably by reducing the inflammatory phase, accelerating the fibrosis process and the deposition of collagen.

Efeitos do aditivo do leite materno com ferro sobre as propriedades bacteriostáticas do leite materno / Effects of human milk fortifier with iron on the bacteriostatic properties of breast milk

OBJETIVO: Comparar o crescimento bacteriano em colostro puro e colostro com aditivo do leite materno contendo ferro. MÉTODOS: Foram comparadas 78 amostras de colostro puro ou colostro com adição de aditivo do leite materno contendo ferro para avaliar o crescimento de Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus e Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Para a análise qualitativa, discos de papel-filtro foram imersos em amostras de cada grupo e incubados por 48 horas com 10¹ Unidades Formadoras de Colônias/mL de cada cepa. Para a avaliação quantitativa, 1 mL de cada cepa contendo 10(7) Unidades Formadoras de Colônias/mL foi homogeneizado com 1 mL, tanto de colostro puro quanto de colostro com aditivo do leite materno, espalhado em placa de Petri e incubado a 37ºC. O número de Unidades Formadoras de Colônias foi contado 24 horas depois. RESULTADOS: A análise qualitativa não mostrou nenhuma diferença no crescimento bacteriano. Na avaliação quantitativa, o crescimento de Escherichia coli (EC) no grupo C foi de 29,4±9,7 x 10(6) CFU/mL, enquanto no grupo FM85 foi de 31,2±10,8 x 10(6) CFU/mL. A diferença entre o crescimento médio foi de 1,9±4,9 x 10(6) CFU/mL (p = 0,001). Não houve diferenças no crescimento de Staphylococcus aureus e Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSÃO: A adição de ferro a essa concentração reduz a ação bacteriostática do leite materno contra Escherichia coli.

OBJECTIVE: To compare bacterial growth in pure colostrum versus colostrum with human milk fortifier (HMF) containing iron. METHODS: The growth of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 78 samples of pure colostrum or colostrum with added iron-containing HMF was compared. For qualitative analysis, filter paper discs were immersed in samples from each group and incubated for 48 hours with 10¹ colony forming units (CFUs)/mL of each strain. For quantitative assessment, 1 mL of each strain containing 10(7) CFUs/mL was homogenized with 1 mL of either colostrum or colostrum with human milk fortifier, seeded into a Petri dish, and incubated at 37ºC. Twenty-four hours later, the number of CFUs was counted. RESULTS: The qualitative analysis showed no difference in bacterial growth. In the quantitative evaluation, E. coli growth in the control group was 29.4±9.7 x 10(6) CFU/ mL, while in the HMF group it was 31.2±10.8 x 10(6) CFU/mL. The difference between the average growth was 1.9±4.9 x 10(6) CFU/mL (p = 0.001). There were no differences in S. aureus and P. aeruginosa growth. CONCLUSION: Addition of iron at this concentration reduces breast milk bacteriostatic action against E. coli.

Effects of human milk fortifier with iron on the bacteriostatic properties of breast milk.

OBJECTIVE: To compare bacterial growth in pure colostrum versus colostrum with human milk fortifier (HMF) containing iron. METHODS: The growth of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 78 samples of pure colostrum or colostrum with added iron-containing HMF was compared. For qualitative analysis, filter paper discs were immersed in samples from each group and incubated for 48 hours with 10(1) colony forming units (CFUs)/mL of each strain. For quantitative assessment, 1 mL of each strain containing 10(7) CFUs/mL was homogenized with 1 mL of either colostrum or colostrum with human milk fortifier, seeded into a Petri dish, and incubated at 37°C. Twenty-four hours later, the number of CFUs was counted. RESULTS: The qualitative analysis showed no difference in bacterial growth. In the quantitative evaluation, E. coli growth in the control group was 29.4±9.7×10(6)CFU/mL, while in the HMF group it was 31.2±10.8×10(6)CFU/mL. The difference between the average growth was 1.9±4.9×10(6)CFU/mL (p=0.001). There were no differences in S. aureus and P. aeruginosa growth. CONCLUSION: Addition of iron at this concentration reduces breast milk bacteriostatic action against E. coli.