Conbercept and Ranibizumab Pretreatments in Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Infusion for Severe Diabetic Retinopathy.

PURPOSE: We compared the efficacies of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) as the adjuvant pretreatments for vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion for tractional retinal detachment (TRD) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 74 patients (79 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for diabetic TRD. They received IVC (37 eyes) or IVR (42 eyes) at standard doses 3-5 days preoperatively and were followed up for ∼6 months. Anatomic success rate, intra- and postoperative complications, and visual outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Initial (IVC vs. IVR: 97% vs. 98%) and final anatomic success rates (100% in each group) and mean visual acuity changes were not significantly different (P = 0.46). Intraoperative complications [iatrogenic retinal breaks (P = 0.58) and intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.66)], postoperative complications [fibrin formation (P = 0.51), postoperative preretinal bleeding (P = 0.88), progressing or persistent neovascular glaucoma (P = 0.63), progressive fibrovascular proliferation (P = 0.93), and recurrent retinal detachment (P = 0.93)], and surgical variables [surgical time (P = 0.53)] were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conbercept and ranibizumab are equally effective surgical adjuvants for vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion in patients with diabetic TRD.

[Rheological properties of sinomenine in situ liquid crystal as liquid embolic agent].

Three different kinds of sinomenine in situ liquid crystal were prepared for different prescriptions, to investigate the rheological properties before and after in situ treatment and evaluate its feasibility for embolization. Rheological experiments were carried out with cone plate fixtures. Both the steady-state rheological and non-steady-state rheological properties of in-situ gels and the swelling gels were studied and compared. Steady-state rheological study results showed that all the three liquid embolic agents were non-newtonian fluid before and after in situ treatment, which would become less ropy when they were pressed with shear stress; their viscosities differed by 2-5 orders of magnitude. It had a yield value of about 10 Pa before in situ treatment and about 4 500 Pa after in situ treatment. All the six systems had thixotropy while their dynamic viscosities were not influenced by the shear rate, all less than 0.3 Pa·s before in situ treatment more than 1 Pa·s after in situ treatment, differing by an order of magnitude. The results of temperature sweeping showed a slight decrease with a steady rate in viscosity within the range of 10-50 °C, differing by 3-4 orders of magnitude. The results of unsteady rheology showed that there was no obvious linear viscoelastic region in the three kinds of agents, indicating the properties of liquid. After in situ treatment, their linear viscoelastic range γ<1% (No.3 was 5%), and their elastic modulus G' was larger than the viscous modulus G", indicating the properties of solid. Frequency scanning results showed that for the systems at low frequencies, G">G', system viscosity in a dominant position; while at high frequencies, G'>G", system elasticity in a dominant position. The results of compound viscosity test also proved that the liquid embolic agent in situ can form a cubic liquid crystal (the structure of No. 3 was destroyed after in situ treatment). The DHR-2 rheometer was used to investigate the rheological properties of in situ gels with three different prescriptions. The method is simple and the result is reliable, which can provide more theoretical reference for the in vitro evaluation and practical application of the product.