Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(8): 737-45, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19566444

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the French program for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic resistance and provide results for some of the indicators available to evaluate the program. In addition to structures and process indicators, the 2 outcome indicators selected were the rate of surgical site infection and the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates among the S. aureus isolates recovered. DESIGN: Descriptive study of the evolution of the national structures for control of healthcare-associated infections since 1992. Through national surveillance networks, process indicators were available from 1993 to 2006, surgical site infection rates were available from 1999 to 2005, and prevalence rates for MRSA infection were available from 2001 to 2007. RESULTS: A comprehensive national program has gradually been set up in France during the period from 1993 to 2004, which included strengthening of organized infection control activities at the local, regional, and national levels and developing large networks for surveillance of specific infections and antibiotic resistance. These achievements were complemented by instituting mandatory notification for unusual nosocomial events, especially outbreaks. The second phase of the program involved the implementation of 5 national quality indicators with public reporting. Surgical site infection rates decreased by 25% over a 6-year period. In France, the median proportion of MRSA among S. aureus isolates recovered from patients with bacteremia decreased from 33.4% to 25.7% during the period from 2001 to 2007, whereas this proportion increased in many other European countries. CONCLUSIONS: Very few national programs have been evaluated since the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control. Although continuing efforts are required, the French program appears to have been effective at reducing infection rates.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Controle de Infecções/tendências , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 46(10): 1499-509, 2008 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419482

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of III-V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4-14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7-14) and at follow-up assessment (21-28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, -8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, -15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Aza/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Aza/administração & dosagem , Compostos Aza/efeitos adversos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Ceftriaxona/administração & dosagem , Ceftriaxona/efeitos adversos , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas , Humanos , Levofloxacino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Moxifloxacina , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Ofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA