Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 47(5): 670-676, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia are common in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and often require supplementation with iron. There is a paucity of literature regarding optimal iron formulation. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving either iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose during inpatient hospitalizations. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease admitted for newly diagnosed disease or flare who received either iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose. Linear regression was used to assess differences in iron repletion. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects models and generalized estimating equations compared hematologic and iron outcomes 6 months post-iron repletion. RESULTS: Thirty patients received ferric carboxymaltose. Sixty-nine patients received iron sucrose. Baseline hemoglobin and iron deficits were similar in both groups. A larger percentage of iron deficit was repleted in the ferric carboxymaltose group (81.4%) compared with iron sucrose (25.9%) (P < 0.001) with fewer infusions. Cumulative doses of ferric carboxymaltose administered (18.7 mg/kg) were higher than iron sucrose (6.1 mg/kg) (P < 0.001). Hemoglobin increased more quickly with ferric carboxymaltose compared with iron sucrose (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). Total iron binding capacity and red cell distribution width levels decreased more over time with ferric carboxymaltose vs iron sucrose (P < 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively). No adverse effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Hematologic and iron parameters responded more quickly with fewer infusions in patients who received ferric carboxymaltose vs iron sucrose. Patients who received ferric carboxymaltose achieved a higher percentage of iron deficit repleted.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Ferro , Humanos , Criança , Óxido de Ferro Sacarado , Ferro/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos Férricos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 46(7): 1578-1584, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35616288

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iron supplementation is required for pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF). There is a paucity of literature on optimal iron formulation and outcomes in this patient population that requires ongoing supplementation. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in pediatric patients with IF receiving iron sucrose (IS) vs ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) iron infusions. METHODS: This was a single-center observational cohort study of pediatric patients with IF requiring ongoing intravenous iron supplementation. Patients were transitioned from IS to FCM as iron therapy. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects models and generalized estimating equations were used to compare outcomes, including hematologic, iron, and growth parameters for 12-month treatment duration on each iron formulation. Adverse effects were descriptively summarized. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. Sixteen received IS and later switched to FCM, five received IS only, and two received FCM only. Most patients' etiology of IF was short bowel syndrome (FCM: 81%, IS: 83%). No differences were seen over time for iron, hematologic, and growth metrics between IS and FCM. The median number of infusions over 12 months for those taking IS was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] = 13-26) and 2 for FCM (IQR = 1-2). Asymptomatic hypophosphatemia was noted in both groups. Similar central line-associated bloodstream infection rates were noted. CONCLUSION: IS and FCM infusions both maintained hematologic and iron parameters with no significant difference noted between the two types of iron, though the number of FCM infusions was significantly less. No significant adverse effects were noted.


Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva , Insuficiência Intestinal , Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Compostos Férricos/efeitos adversos , Óxido de Ferro Sacarado/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Ferro , Maltose/efeitos adversos , Maltose/análogos & derivados
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA