RESUMO
PURPOSE: Malnutrition is a common problem among pancreatic cancer (PC) patients that negatively impacts on their quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. The main objective of this consensus is to address the role of Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) into the comprehensive therapeutic management of PC patients. METHODS: A Spanish multidisciplinary group of specialists from the areas of Medical Oncology; Radiation Oncology; Endocrinology and Nutrition; and General Surgery agreed to assess the role of MNT as part of the best therapeutic management of PC patients. RESULTS: The panel established different recommendations focused on nutritional screening and nutritional screening tools, MNT strategies according to PC status, and MNT in palliative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unmet need to integrate nutritional therapy as a crucial part of the multimodal care process in PC patients. Health authorities, health care professionals, cancer patients, and their families should be aware of the relevance of nutritional status and MNT on clinical outcomes and QoL of PC patients.
Assuntos
Desnutrição/dietoterapia , Desnutrição/etiologia , Terapia Nutricional , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Procedimentos Clínicos , Humanos , Estado NutricionalRESUMO
Pancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) are both aggressive and highly fatal malignancies. Nowadays we have a profound knowledge about the molecular landscape of these neoplasms and this has allowed new therapeutic options. Surgery is the only potentially curative therapy in both cancers, but disease recurrence is frequent. In PC, adjuvant treatment with mFOLFIRINOX has improved overall survival (OS) and in BTC adjuvant treatment with capecitabine seems to improve OS and relapse-free survival. Concomitant radio-chemotherapy could also be considered following R1 surgery in both neoplasms. Neoadjuvant treatment represents the best option for achieving an R0 resection in borderline PC. Upfront systemic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in unresectable locally advanced PC and BTC; then locoregional therapy could be considered after an initial period of at least 3-4 months of systemic chemotherapy. In metastatic PC, FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel have improved OS compared with gemcitabine alone. In metastatic BTC, cisplatin plus gemcitabine constitute the standard treatment. Progress in the knowledge of molecular biology has enabled the identification of new targets for therapy with encouraging results that could in the future improve the survival and quality of life of patients with PC and BTC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/genética , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/patologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/cirurgia , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Oncologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Sociedades Médicas , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) is accepted as a reference treatment for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a regimen without leucovorin (LV) (FUIRI) is not inferior to the standard FOLFIRI (response rate). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with MCRC were randomized to receive either irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) on day 1) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/m(2) bolus and 600 mg/m(2) 22-h infusion) + LV (200 mg/m(2) on days 1-2) (FOLFIRI) every 2 weeks or irinotecan (80 mg/m(2)) + 5-FU (2.250 mg/m(2) 48-h infusion) (FUIRI) weekly. RESULTS: In all, 346 patients were included, 173 in each arm. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the response rates for FOLFIRI and FUIRI were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 64%] and 51% (95% CI 43% to 59%), respectively (P = 0.2809). No statistically significant differences were observed between FOLFIRI and FUIRI regarding median progression-free survival (8.3 versus 8.4 months; P = 0.4339) nor median overall survival (21.6 versus 19.2 months; log-rank test P = 0.2941). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly more frequent on FOLFIRI arm (27% versus 9%), while the proportion of diarrhea was higher on FUIRI arm (21% versus 42%). CONCLUSION: FUIRI represents a valid alternative without LV to the FOLFIRI regimen as MCRC first-line treatment.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Irinotecano , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The choice of the most suitable chemotherapy schedule for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer has been reviewed by the TTD group, as well as the principles of risk assessment for patients with stage II disease. In the light of data now available, oxaliplatin- based schedules (FOLFOX4 or FLOX) are recommended. Alternatives in special situations are monotherapy with capecitabine, UFT/LV, or 5- FU/LV in infusion. In patients with stage II disease, the indication of chemotherapy must be individualized and based on the patient's risk of recurrence (perforation, obstruction, peritumoral lymphovascular involvement, poorly differentiated histology, number of lymph nodes examined < or = 11, pre-surgical CEA), and comorbidities that can compromise the safety of treatment or survival of the patient.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Algoritmos , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Capecitabina , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Tegafur/administração & dosagem , Uracila/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan [30 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion] combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU 3 g/m(2) weekly 48 h i.v. infusion, TTD regimen) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the treatment of gastrointestinal solid tumors (in phase I), and the antitumor activity and toxicity of the recommended phase I dose (in phase II) were determined. RESULTS: Diarrhea was the DLT, and irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 3 g/m(2) was the recommended phase I dose. In phase II, the confirmed response rate was 44% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 59%] and the median overall survival was 23.8 months. However, grade 3/4 diarrhea affected 59% of patients and led to withdrawal of three patients. A second cohort of patients studied using the same schedule but with a reduced 5-FU starting dose of 2.25 g/m(2) showed improved tolerance (the incidence of grade 4 diarrhea decreased from 28% to 11% and overall grade 3/4 diarrhea to 56%, with no patient withdrawals) but the confirmed response rate was 28% (95% CI 14% to 45%) and median overall survival was 17.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: We found weekly irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) plus TTD regimen (5-FU 2.25 g/m(2) given as 48-h i.v. infusion) to be a feasible and active combined chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Irinotecano , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) 350 mg/m(2) i.v. once every 3 weeks was assessed in 60 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) showing failure to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment. The overall objective response rate was 13.6% (1 complete response and 4 partial responses) and 25 patients (42.4%) showed stable disease; the median time to disease progression was 4.4 months and the median survival was 10.5 months. The main non-hematological toxicities were alopecia (80.3% of patients), diarrhea (75.0%), and nausea/vomiting (71.7%); neutropenia was the main hematological toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea appeared in 21 of 131 cycles (16.1%), whereas grade 3 or 4 neutropenia appeared in 78 cycles (25.0%). In conclusion, the present phase II study confirms that CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is active and well tolerated as second-line chemotherapy for CRC in 5-FU resistant patients.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alopecia/induzido quimicamente , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/farmacologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Irinotecano , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of doxorubicin versus methotrexate in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FAC versus CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 985 women undergoing curative surgery for breast cancer (T1-3 N0-2 M0, stage I-IIIA, UICC) from nine hospitals were stratified with respect to axillary node involvement (node positive versus node negative) and randomized to receive either FAC (500/50/500/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles or CMF (600/60/600/m(2)) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: The relative dose intensities of FAC and CMF were 87% and 85% of planned doses, respectively. Unadjusted data indicated a non-significant trend towards better results with FAC. In the prospectively formed subset of node-negative patients, disease-free survival and overall survival were statistically superior in the FAC treatment arm (P = 0.041 and 0.034, respectively), but this advantage was not seen in the subset of node-positive patients, probably because of a difference in the percentage of patients with four or more positive nodes. Adjusting data for size of treatment effect and potential interactions (number of positive nodes, tumor size, treatment center), the overall relative risk (RR) of disease recurrence and death were significantly lower with FAC treatment (RR 1.2, P = 0.03, and RR 1.3, P = 0.05, respectively). This result was mainly due to the difference observed in the node-negative patient population. Toxicity was mild: FAC induced more alopecia, emesis, mucositis and cardiotoxicity; this last was of clinical concern, but was infrequent and manageable. CMF induced more conjunctivitis and weight gain. There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil is superior to methotrexate in combination with day 1 i.v. cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. A treatment effect is particularly evident in the node-negative patients. Although the clinical toxicity of FAC is greater than that of CMF, the levels were manageable and clinically acceptable.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Metástase Linfática , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Café/efeitos adversos , Genes ras/genética , Mutação/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Causalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Epidemiologia Molecular , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiologia , Pesquisa/organização & administração , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relation between coffee consumption and mutations in the K-ras gene in exocrine pancreatic cancer. DESIGN: Case-case study. Consumption of coffee among cases with the activating mutation in the K-ras gene was compared with that of cases without the mutation. SETTING AND PATIENTS: All cases of pancreatic cancer newly diagnosed at five hospitals in Spain during three years were included in the PANKRAS II Study (n = 185, of whom 121 whose tissue was available for molecular analysis are the object of the present report). Over 88% were personally interviewed in hospital. DNA was amplified from paraffin wax embedded tissues, and mutations in codon 12 of K-ras were detected by the artificial RFLP technique. MAIN RESULTS: Mutations were found in tumours from 94 of 121 patients (77.7%). Mutations were more common among regular coffee drinkers than among non-regular coffee drinkers (82.0% v 55.6%, p = 0.018, n = 107). The odds ratio adjusted by age, sex, smoking and alcohol drinking was 5.41 (95% CI 1.64, 17.78). The weekly intake of coffee was significantly higher among patients with a mutated tumour (mean of 14.5 cups/week v 8.8 among patients with a wild type tumour, p < 0.05). With respect to non-regular coffee drinkers, the odds ratio of a mutated tumour adjusted by age, sex, smoking and alcohol drinking was 3.26 for drinkers of 2-7 cups/week, 5.77 for drinkers of 8-14 cups/week and 9.99 for drinkers of > or = 15 cups/week (p < 0.01, test for trend). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer cases without activating mutations in the K-ras gene had drank significantly less coffee than cases with a mutation, with a significant dose response relation: the less they drank, the less likely their tumours were to harbour a mutation. In exocrine pancreatic cancer the K-ras gene may be activated less often among non-regular coffee drinkers than among regular drinkers. Caffeine, other coffee compounds or other factors with which coffee drinking is associated may modulate K-ras activation.
Assuntos
Café/efeitos adversos , Genes ras/genética , Mutação/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Genes ras/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given by bolus injection together with intravenous leucovorin (LV) versus high-dose 5-FU in continuous infusion (CI) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 306 patients were randomized to receive either 5-FU 425 mg/m2 given by bolus injection on days 1-5 plus intravenous (i.v.) LV 20 mg/m2 every four to five weeks or 5-FU 3.5 g/m2/week in a 48-hour CI. Therapy was continued until disease progression. Second-line chemotherapy was allowed in both arms. RESULTS: The response rates in 306 patients with measurable lesions were 19.2% (modulated arm) and 30.3% (CI arm, P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival times were 23.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 25 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). Median survival times were 42.5 weeks (modulated arm) and 48 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). There were no significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity profiles but if we consider all grades we observed more mucositis in the modulated arm and more hand-foot syndrome in the CI arm. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of response rate, the continuous infusion regimen was more effective than the modulated regimen. There was no significant difference in survival and time to progression, and none in grade 3-4 toxicity.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In a previous phase I-II trial we showed that the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a weekly 48-hour continuous infusion (CI) was 3.5 g/m2. In a subsequent confirmative phase II trial with 85 evaluable patients, a 38.5% response rate was obtained, and a median survival of 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin. On this basis we attempted to modulate high-dose 5-FU (3 g/m2) with oral leucovorin (LV) but the regimen was too toxic and the dose had to be reduced. A new phase II trial with 2 g/m2/week plus oral leucovorin was planned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to June 1994, 110 previously untreated patients with advanced, measurable colorectal cancer were included in a multicenter study. The patients received, on an outpatient basis, 5-FU 2 g/m2 by continuous infusion for 48 hours once a week until progression or the appearance of toxic effects. Oral leucovorin (60 mg every six hours) was also given during the 5-FU infusion. RESULTS: Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 1.6 g/m2/week (range 0.9-2). Three complete responses and 36 partial responses were observed. The overall response rate was 37.5% (95% CI, 28% to 46.8%), the median time to progression 7.4 months and median survival 14.5 months. W.H.O. grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 27 patients (24.5%); grade 3 mucositis was observed in 9 (8.1%) patients and grade 4 in one. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was reported in 13 (11.7%) patients, while grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was detected in only 5 (4.5%). Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in one patient and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in two. CONCLUSIONS: Oral leucovorin modulation of weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU at 2 g/m2 is an active regimen, with diarrhea and mucositis as the main limiting toxic effects. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that obtained with a weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m2.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
Background In a previous phase I to II trial, we have shown that the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in 48-hour continuous infusion (CI) weekly was 3.5 gr/m2. In a subsequent confirmative phase II trial with 85 evaluable patients, a 38.5% response rate was obtained and the median survival reached was 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with Leucovorin. On this basis we tried to modulate high-dose 5-FU (3 gr/m2) with oral leucovorin (LV) but the regimen was too toxic and the dose had to be reduced. A new phase II trial with 2 g/m2/week plus oral leucovorin was planned. Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 1.6 g/m2/week (range 0.9-2). Three complete responses and 36 partial responses were observed. Overall response rate was 37.5% (95% CI, 28% to 46.8%). Median time to progression has been 7.4 months, and median survival 14.4 months. WHO grade 3 diarrhea was seen in 27 patients (24.5%). Grade 3 mucositis was also seen in 9 (8.1%) patients, and grade 4 was observed in one. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was reported in 13 (11.7%) patients. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was detected in only 5 (4.5%) patients. Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in 1 case and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in two cases, respectively. Oral leucovorin modulation of weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU at 2 g/m2 is an active regimen, with diarrhea and mucositis as main limiting toxicities. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that obtained with a weekly 48 hour continuous infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m2.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Anemia/complicações , Antídotos/uso terapêutico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Diarreia/complicações , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Leucopenia/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In a previous Phase II trial, the authors showed that a weekly continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 3.5 g/m2 for 48 hours is an active treatment for advanced colorectal cancer. The overall response rate was 38.5%, and the median survival was 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin. To study the modulation of this weekly, high dose, continuous infusion 5-FU with oral leucovorin, a new Phase II trial was planned. METHODS: From December 1991 to July 1992, 43 previously untreated patients with measurable advanced colorectal cancer were included in a multicenter study. They received on an outpatient basis 5-FU at a weekly dose of 3 g/m2 by continuous infusion for 48 hours until progression or toxicity. Oral leucovorin (60 mg every 6 hours) also was given during the infusion of 5-FU. RESULTS: Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 2.2 g/m2/week (range, 0.76-3 g/m2/week). One complete response and 11 partial responses were observed. The overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-45%). Median time to progression was 7 months, and the median survival was 15 months. World Health Organization Grades 3 and 4 diarrhea were observed in 19 (45%) and 6 (14%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis also was observed in 10 (24%) patients, and Grade 4 mucositis was observed in 1. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were reported in seven (17%) patients. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was detected in only two (2.5%) patients. No leukopenia or thrombocytopenia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral leucovorin modulation of a weekly 48-hour infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 3 g/m2 of leucovorin is a toxic regimen, always requiring dose reduction, with diarrhea and mucositis as the main limiting toxicities. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that observed with a weekly 48-hour infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m2.