Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 16 Suppl 3: S105-13, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26561881

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Satisfactory musical sound quality remains a challenge for many cochlear implant (CI) users. In particular, questionnaires completed by CI users suggest that reverberation due to room acoustics can negatively impact their music listening experience. The objective of this study was to more specifically characterize of the effect of reverberation on musical sound quality in CI users, normal hearing (NH) non-musicians, and NH musicians using a previously designed assessment method, called Cochlear Implant-MUltiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor (CI-MUSHRA). METHODS: In this method, listeners were randomly presented with an anechoic musical segment and five-versions of this segment in which increasing amounts of reverberation were artificially added. Participants listened to the six reverberation versions and provided sound quality ratings between 0 (very poor) and 100 (excellent). RESULTS: Results demonstrated that on average CI users and NH non-musicians preferred the sound quality of anechoic versions to more reverberant versions. In comparison, NH musicians could be delineated into those who preferred the sound quality of anechoic pieces and those who preferred pieces with some reverberation. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to objectively compare the effects of reverberation on musical sound quality ratings in CI users. These results suggest that musical sound quality for CI users can be improved by non-reverberant listening conditions and musical stimuli in which reverberation is removed.


Assuntos
Percepção Auditiva , Implantes Cocleares/psicologia , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Música/psicologia , Som/efeitos adversos , Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Adulto , Implante Coclear , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Perda Auditiva/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória , Adulto Jovem
2.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 16 Suppl 3: S121-8, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26561883

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Phantom Electrode strategy makes use of partial bipolar stimulation on the two most apical electrodes in an effort to extend the frequency range available to cochlear implant (CI) users. This study aimed to quantify the effect of the Phantom Electrode strategy on bass frequency perception in music listening in CI users. METHODS: Eleven adult Advanced Bionics users with the Fidelity 120 processing strategy and 16 adult normal hearing (NH) individuals participated in the study. All subjects completed the CI-multiple stimulus with hidden reference and anchor (MUSHRA), a test of an individual's ability to make discriminations in sound quality following the removal of bass frequency information. NH participants completed the CI-MUSHRA once, whereas CI users completed the task twice - once with their baseline clinical program and once with the Phantom Electrode strategy, in random order. CI users' performance was assessed in comparison with NH performance. RESULTS: The Phantom Electrode strategy improved CI users performance on the CI-MUSHRA compared with Fidelity 120. DISCUSSION: Creation of a Phantom Electrode percept through partial bipolar stimulation of the two most apical electrodes appears to improve CI users' perception of bass frequency information in music, contributing to greater accuracy in the ability to detect alterations in musical sound quality. CONCLUSION: The Phantom Electrode processing strategy may enhance the experience of listening to music and thus acoustic stimuli more broadly by improving perception of bass frequencies, through direction of current towards the apical portion of the cochlea beyond the termination of the electrode.


Assuntos
Estimulação Acústica/instrumentação , Implantes Cocleares , Surdez/psicologia , Música/psicologia , Percepção da Altura Sonora , Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Adulto , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Surdez/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Trends Amplif ; 17(1): 45-53, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23539260

RESUMO

Cochlear Implant (CI) users typically perform poorly on musical tasks, especially those based on pitch ranking and melody recognition. It was hypothesized that CI users would demonstrate deterioration in performance for a pitch ranking and a melody recognition task presented with iterated rippled noise (IRN) in comparison to pure tones (PT). In Addition, it was hypothesized that normal hearing (NH) listeners would show fewer differences in performance between IRN and PT for these two tasks. In this study, the ability of CI users and NH subjects to rank pitches and to identify melodies created with IRN and PT was assessed in free field in a sound-isolated room. CI subjects scored significantly above chance level with PT stimuli in both tasks. With IRN stimuli their performance was around chance level. NH subjects scored significantly above chance level in both tasks and with all stimuli. NH subjects performed significantly better than CI subjects in both tasks. These results illustrate the difficulties of CI subjects to rank pitches and to identify melodies.


Assuntos
Audiometria de Tons Puros , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Implantes Cocleares , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação , Música , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Discriminação da Altura Tonal , Estimulação Acústica , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/métodos , Estimulação Elétrica , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Reconhecimento Psicológico , Espectrografia do Som , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Trends Amplif ; 16(4): 191-200, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23172009

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to (a) apply the musical sound quality assessment method, Cochlear Implant-MUltiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor (CI-MUSHRA), to quantify musical sound quality deficits in CI (cochlear implant) users with respect to high-frequency loss, and (b) assess possible correlations between CI-MUSHRA performance and self-reported musical sound quality, as assessed by more traditional rating scales. Five versions of real-world musical stimuli were created: 8-,4-, and 2-kHz low-pass-filtered (LPF) versions with increasing high-frequency removal, a composite stimulus containing a 1-kHz LPF-filtered version and white noise ("anchor"), and an unaltered version ("hidden reference"). Using the CI-MUSHRA methodology, these versions were simultaneously presented to participants in addition to a labeled reference. Participants listened to all versions and provided ratings based on a 100-point scale that reflected perceived sound quality difference among the versions. A total of 25 musical stimuli were tested. As comparison measures, participants completed four Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to assess musical sound quality. Overall, compared to normal hearing (NH) listeners, CI users demonstrated an impaired ability to discriminate between unaltered and altered musical stimuli with variable amounts of high-frequency information removed. Performance using CI-MUSHRA to evaluate this parameter did not correlate to measurements of musical sound quality, as assessed by VAS. This study identified high-frequency loss as one acoustic parameter contributing to overall CI-mediated musical sound quality limitations. CI-MUSHRA provided a quantitative assessment of musical sound quality. This method offers the potential to quantify CI impairments of many different acoustic parameters related to musical sound quality in the future.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Implantes Cocleares , Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Música , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Percepção da Altura Sonora , Estimulação Acústica , Acústica , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Discriminação Psicológica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Discriminação da Altura Tonal , Desenho de Prótese , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 33(3): 319-27, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22314920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although cochlear implant (CI) users frequently report deterioration of sound quality when listening to music, few methods exist to quantify these subjective claims. OBJECTIVE: 1) To design a novel research method for quantifying sound quality perception in CI users during music listening; 2) To validate this method by assessing one attribute of music perception, bass frequency perception, which is hypothesized to be relevant to overall musical sound quality perception. HYPOTHESIS: Limitations in bass frequency perception contribute to CI-mediated sound quality deteriorations. The proposed method will quantify this deterioration by measuring CI users' impaired ability to make sound quality discriminations among musical stimuli with variable amounts of bass frequency removal. METHOD: A method commonly used in the audio industry (multiple stimulus with hidden reference and anchor [MUSHRA]) was adapted for CI users, referred to as CI-MUSHRA. CI users and normal hearing controls were presented with 7 sound quality versions of a musical segment: 5 high pass filter cutoff versions (200-, 400-, 600-, 800-, 1000-Hz) with decreasing amounts of bass information, an unaltered version ("hidden reference"), and a highly altered version (1,000-1,200 Hz band pass filter; "anchor"). Participants provided sound quality ratings between 0 (very poor) and 100 (excellent) for each version; ratings reflected differences in perceived sound quality among stimuli. RESULTS: CI users had greater difficulty making overall sound quality discriminations as a function of bass frequency loss than normal hearing controls, as demonstrated by a significantly weaker correlation between bass frequency content and sound quality ratings. In particular, CI users could not perceive sound quality difference among stimuli missing up to 400 Hz of bass frequency information. CONCLUSION: Bass frequency impairments contribute to sound quality deteriorations during music listening for CI users. CI-MUSHRA provided a systematic and quantitative assessment of this reduced sound quality. Although the effects of bass frequency removal were studied here, we advocate CI-MUSHRA as a user-friendly and versatile research tool to measure the effects of a wide range of acoustic manipulations on sound quality perception in CI users.


Assuntos
Percepção Auditiva/fisiologia , Implantes Cocleares , Música/psicologia , Estimulação Acústica , Adulto , Idoso , Surdez/fisiopatologia , Surdez/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção da Altura Sonora/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA