The role of capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer treatment: an update.

Preoperative infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) followed by total mesorectal surgery is the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LAR). When compared with postoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation, this strategy is associated with significantly lower rates of local relapse, lower toxicity and better compliance. Capecitabine is a rationally designed oral prodrug that is converted into 5-FU by intracellular thymidine phosphorylase. Substitution of infusional 5-FU with capecitabine is an attractive option that provides a more convenient administration schedule and, possibly, increased efficacy. Indeed, incorporation of capecitabine in combined modality neoadjuvant therapy for LAR has been under intense investigation during the last 10 years. Phase I and II clinical trials showed that a regimen consisting of capecitabine 825mg/m(2) twice daily for 7 days/week continuous oral administration in combination with RT is an active and well tolerated regimen, thereby being the preferred concurrent regimen. The definitive demonstration that efficacy of capecitabine/RT is similar to 5-FU/RT has been provided by the NSABP-R-04 and the German Margit trials. One approach to improve outcomes in rectal cancer is to deliver a second RT-sensitizing drug with effective systemic activity. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan are therefore good candidates. However, two phase III trials demonstrated that incorporation of oxaliplatin to capecitabine with RT did not improve early outcomes and, by contrast, increased toxicity. Capecitabine has also been combined with irinotecan. This regimen showed encouraging results in phase I and II clinical trials, which led to an ongoing phase III clinical trial. New strategies with induction chemotherapy with or without chemoradiation prior to surgery are currently under investigation. Whether or not capecitabine has a role in this setting is being investigated in ongoing trials. Incorporation of agents directed towards new targets, such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies or antiangiogenic agents, in combination preoperative regimens, is being hampered by results of early trials in which efficacy outcomes with cetuximab were poor and an excessive rate of surgical complications with bevacizumab was observed. The lack of improvements in efficacy with the addition of cetuximab or bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer led to concerns about further development of these agents in rectal cancer. The role of capecitabine in the postoperative adjuvant setting is the aim of the ongoing Dutch SCRIPT trial. The prediction of response associated with capecitabine has been based on expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, as well as on gene expression arrays. All these procedures require further validation and should be considered as investigational. In conclusion, capecitabine can safely and effectively replace intravenous continuous infusion of 5-FU in the preoperative chemoradiation setting for rectal cancer management. The addition of other new antineoplastic agents to a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen remains investigational.

Upregulation of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) after rectal cancer chemoradiotherapy is an adverse prognostic factor and a potential therapeutic target.

PURPOSE: Management of locally advanced rectal cancer (RC) consists of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with fluoropyrimidines, followed by total mesorectal excision. We sought to evaluate the expression of selected genes, some of which were derived from a previous undirected SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression)-based approach, before and after CRT, to identify mechanisms of resistance. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 129 consecutive patients. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction of 53 candidate genes was performed on the biopsy specimen before treatment and on the surgical specimen after CRT. A paired-samples t test was performed to determine genes that were significantly changed after CRT. The result was correlated with patients' disease-free survival. RESULTS: Twenty-two genes were significantly upregulated, and two were significantly downregulated. Several of the upregulated genes have roles in cell cycle control; these include CCNB1IP1, RCC1, EEF2, CDKN1, TFF3, and BCL2. The upregulation of TFF3 was associated with worse disease-free survival on multivariate analyses (hazard ratio, 2.64; P=.027). Patients whose surgical specimens immunohistochemically showed secretion of TFF3 into the lumen of the tumoral microglands had a higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 2.51; P=.014). In vitro experiments showed that DLD-1 cells stably transfected with TFF3 were significantly less sensitive to 5-fluorouracil and showed upregulation of genes involved in the transcriptional machinery and in resistance to apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Upregulation of TFF3 after CRT for RC is associated with a higher risk of relapse. The physiological role of TFF3 in restoring the mucosa during CRT could be interfering with treatment efficacy. Our results could reveal not only a novel RC prognostic marker but also a therapeutic target.

Expression of choline kinase alpha to predict outcome in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate prognostic markers to predict outcome of patients with lung cancer are still needed. The aim of this study was to assess whether choline kinase alpha (ChoKalpha) gene expression could identify patients with different prognoses. ChoKalpha is an enzyme involved in cell metabolism and proliferation and has a role in oncogene-mediated transformation in several human tumours, including lung cancer. METHODS: 60 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had undergone surgical resection in a single centre were enrolled into the study as the training group. We used real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) to measure ChoKalpha gene expression and analyse the association between ChoKalpha expression and survival in evaluable patients. Additionally, a second group of 120 patients with NSCLC from a different hospital were enrolled into the study as the validation group. We did an overall analysis of all 167 patients who had available tissue to confirm the cut-off point for future studies. The primary endpoints were lung-cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival. FINDINGS: Seven of the 60 patients in the training group were not evaluable due to insufficient tissue. In the 53 evaluable patients, the cut-off for those with ChoKalpha overexpression was defined by receiver operator under the curve (ROC) methodology. 4-year lung-cancer-specific survival was 54.43% (95% CI 28.24-80.61) for 25 patients with ChoKalpha expression above the ROC-defined cut-off compared with 88.27% (75.79-100) for 28 patients with concentrations of the enzyme below this cut-off (hazard ratio [HR] 3.14 [0.83-11.88], p=0.07). In the validation group, six of the 120 enrolled patients were not evaluable due to insufficient tissue. For the other 114 patients, 4-year lung-cancer-specific survival was 46.66% (32.67-59.65) for those with ChoKalpha expression above the ROC-defined cut-off compared with 67.01% (50.92-81.11) for patients with concentrations of ChoKalpha below the cut-off (HR 1.87 [1.01-3.46], p=0.04). A global analysis of all 167 patients further confirmed the association between ChoKalpha overexpression and worse clinical outcome of patients with NSCLC: 4-year lung-cancer-specific survival for ChoKalpha expression above the ROC-defined cut-off was 49.00% (36.61-60.38) compared with 70.52% (59.80-76.75) for those with concentrations of ChoKalpha below the cut-off (HR 1.98 [1.14-3.45], p=0.01). The overall analysis confirmed the cut-off for ChoKalpha expression should be 1.91-times higher than concentrations noted in healthy tissues when ChoKalpha is used as an independent predictive factor of relapse-free and lung-cancer-specific survival in patients with early-stage NSCLC. INTERPRETATION: ChoKalpha expression is a new prognostic factor that could be used to help identify patients with early-stage NSCLC who might be at high risk of recurrence, and to identify patients with favourable prognosis who could receive less aggressive treatment options or avoid adjuvant systemic treatment. New treatments that inhibit ChoKalpha expression or activity in patients with lung cancer should be studied further.