Uric Acid: A Translational Journey in Cerebroprotection That Spanned Preclinical and Human Data.

Uric acid (UA) is a strong endogenous antioxidant that neutralizes the toxicity of peroxynitrite and other reactive species on the neurovascular unit generated during and after acute brain ischemia. The realization that a rapid reduction of UA levels during an acute ischemic stroke was associated with a worse stroke outcome paved the way to investigate the value of exogenous UA supplementation to counteract the progression of redox-mediated ischemic brain damage. The long translational journey for UA supplementation recently reached a critical milestone when the results of the multicenter NIH stroke preclinical assessment network (SPAN) were reported. In a novel preclinical paradigm, 6 treatment candidates including UA supplementation were selected and tested in 6 independent laboratories following predefined criteria and strict methodological rigor. UA supplementation was the only intervention in SPAN that exceeded the prespecified efficacy boundary with male and female animals, young mice, young rats, aging mice, obese mice, and spontaneously hypertensive rats. This unprecedented achievement will allow UA to undergo clinical testing in a pivotal clinical trial through a NIH StrokeNet thrombectomy endovascular platform created to assess new treatment strategies in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. UA is a particularly appealing adjuvant intervention for mechanical thrombectomy because it targets the microcirculatory hypoperfusion and oxidative stress that limits the efficacy of this therapy. This descriptive review aims to summarize the translational development of UA supplementation, highlighting those aspects that likely contributed to its success. It includes having a well-defined target and mechanism of action, and an approach that simultaneously integrated rigorous preclinical assessment, with epidemiologic and preliminary human intervention studies. Validation of the clinical value of UA supplementation in a pivotal trial would confirm the translational value of the SPAN paradigm in preclinical research.

Characteristics of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) unifies a subgroup of cryptogenic strokes based on neuroimaging, a defined minimum set of diagnostic tests, and exclusion of certain causes. Despite an annual stroke recurrence rate of 5%, little is known about the etiology underlying recurrent stroke after ESUS. Objective: To identify the stroke subtype of recurrent ischemic strokes after ESUS, to explore the interaction with treatment assignment in each category, and to examine the consistency of cerebral location of qualifying ESUS and recurrent ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: The NAVIGATE-ESUS trial was a randomized clinical trial conducted from December 23, 2014, to October 5, 2017. The trial compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with recent ESUS (n = 7213). Ischemic stroke was validated in 309 of the 7213 patients by adjudicators blinded to treatment assignment and classified by local investigators into the categories ESUS or non-ESUS (ie, cardioembolic, atherosclerotic, lacunar, other determined cause, or insufficient testing). Five patients with recurrent strokes that could not be defined as ischemic or hemorrhagic in absence of neuroimaging or autopsy were excluded. Data for this secondary post hoc analysis were analyzed from March to June 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban, 15 mg/d, or aspirin, 100 mg/d. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of recurrent ESUS with stroke characteristics. Results: A total of 309 patients (205 men [66%]; mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years) had ischemic stroke identified during the median follow-up of 11 (interquartile range [IQR], 12) months (annualized rate, 4.6%). Diagnostic testing was insufficient for etiological classification in 39 patients (13%). Of 270 classifiable ischemic strokes, 156 (58%) were ESUS and 114 (42%) were non-ESUS (37 [32%] cardioembolic, 26 [23%] atherosclerotic, 35 [31%] lacunar, and 16 [14%] other determined cause). Atrial fibrillation was found in 27 patients (9%) with recurrent ischemic stroke and was associated with higher morbidity (median change in modified Rankin scale score 2 [IQR, 3] vs 0 (IQR, 1]) and mortality (15% vs 1%) than other causes. Risk of recurrence did not differ significantly by subtype between treatment groups. For both the qualifying and recurrent strokes, location of infarct was more often in the left (46% and 54%, respectively) than right hemisphere (40% and 37%, respectively) or brainstem or cerebellum (14% and 9%, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of randomized clinical trial data, most recurrent strokes after ESUS were embolic and of undetermined source. Recurrences associated with atrial fibrillation were a minority but were more often disabling and fatal. More extensive investigation to identify the embolic source is important toward an effective antithrombotic strategy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02313909.

A pilot study of dual treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and uric acid in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Uric acid (UA) increases the neuroprotective effects of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in experimental ischemia. In patients with stroke, increased UA levels have been linked to better stroke recovery, but the clinical safety of dual administration of UA and rt-PA is unknown. METHODS: Using a double-blind design, we assessed the safety of exogenous UA in patients with acute stroke treated with rt-PA. Patients were randomized to an intravenous solution of 500 mL of 5% mannitol/0.1% lithium carbonate (vehicle group, n=8) or 500 or 1000 mg of UA (n=16). Safety end points at day 90, lipid peroxidation (serum malondialdehyde), and serum kinetics of UA were established. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with stroke were treated with rt-PA within mean (SD) 133 (35) minutes of clinical onset (admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score mean [SD] 11 [7], age 71 [10.6] years, 71% males). Levels of UA decreased in the vehicle group and increased for approximately 24 hours in the high dose of UA group, which also had lower levels of malondialdehyde at day 5. Mortality (12.5%), symptomatic central nervous system bleeding (0%), and outcome at day 90 were similar in the 3 treatment arms; one patient in the high-dose group had a mild gouty episode. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of UA appears to be safe, decreases lipid peroxidation, and prevents an early fall of UA in serum in patients treated with rt-PA within 3 hours of stroke onset. The clinical efficacy of dual administration of exogenous UA and rt-PA deserves further investigation in a larger acute stroke trial.