Genetic Variations of the Vitamin D Metabolic Pathway and COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: Current Understanding and Existing Evidence.

The immunomodulatory and metabolic effects of vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation have been considered beneficial in mitigating the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) has pleiotropic effects on the immune system that may influence inflammation associated with COVID-19. Multiple observational studies have demonstrated an association between low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk and the severity of COVID-19 infection. However, the impact of vitamin D supplementation as an adjunctive treatment for COVID-19 based on evidence from randomized clinical trials is unclear. Equally important is that certain variations of the genes involved in the vitamin D metabolic pathway have been shown to affect immune function and linked with various clinical outcomes, including cardio-metabolic disorders, autoimmune diseases, infections, and cancers. This indicates inter-individual difference in body response to vitamin D. There is also emerging evidence that common polymorphisms of these genes may influence the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19, although the confidence of these findings is limited by a small number of studies and participants. Further studies are needed to address the potential role of VDR activation and DBP in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 which take into account the genetic variations of vitamin D metabolic pathway.

Evaluation of 14-day Concentration-time Curves of Vitamin D3 and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in Healthy Adults With Varying Body Mass Index.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To analyze the concentration-time curves of single-dose oral 25(OH)D3 in comparison with vitamin D3 in healthy adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pharmacokinetics observed over two weeks after orally administering single 900 µg doses of vitamin D3 and 25(OH)D3 to six otherwise healthy vitamin D insufficient/deficient adults participating in a broader randomized, double-blind, crossover, single center trial was analyzed. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (H-37167). RESULTS: Individual concentration-time curves revealed that vitamin D3 took longer than 25(OH)D3 to reach its maximal concentration after ingestion in five participants. After 25(OH)D3 ingestion, 25(OH)D3 reached its maximal concentration, dropped rapidly, and plateaued before starting to decrease slowly. There were observable inter-individual variations in the bioavailability of vitamin D3 and 25(OH)D3 and the pattern of changes in 25(OH)D3 concentration after their ingestion. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetics of 25(OH)D3 in comparison with vitamin D3 was illustrated and described in this study.

Nutritional rickets and vitamin D deficiency: consequences and strategies for treatment and prevention.

INTRODUCTION: Rickets is typically characterized by bone deformities due to defective bone mineralization and chondrocyte maturation in growing bones. However, infantile rickets often goes unrecognized, because the skeletal abnormalities are more subtle and often can only be detected radiologically. Nutritional rickets is a major public health concern in several regions worldwide. It is most commonly caused by vitamin D and/or calcium deficiency. AREA COVERED: We provide an overview of historical perspective, epidemiology, and pathophysiology of nutritional rickets. Additionally, we outline diagnostic approaches and highlight challenges in radiographic diagnosis of rickets. Finally, we present strategies for prevention and treatment of rickets. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the evidence from clinical databases that rickets is a rare disease, it is likely that rickets is clinically underdiagnosed as studies designed to screen healthy children for radiographic evidence of rickets reported surprisingly much higher prevalence. It has been reported that some of the radiologic features of rickets can be misinterpreted as fractures. To prevent nutritional rickets, most if not all infants and young children, should receive vitamin D from formulas and foods that are fortified with vitamin D or supplementation to achieve a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of at least 20 ng/mL as recommended by the Institute of Medicine. It has been recommended by the Endocrine Society that to achieve maximum bone health for children and adults, a serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D should be at least 30 ng/mL and preferably 40-60 ng/mL. Pregnant women who are unable to obtain an adequate amount of vitamin D from sunlight exposure and natural and fortified diets should take a vitamin D supplement of 1500-2000 IUs daily as recommended by the Endocrine Society since it has been demonstrated that 600 IUs daily will not maintain a circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D of at least 20 ng/mL and most pregnant women. If lactating women take approximately 6400 IUs of vitamin D daily, they provide enough vitamin D in their milk to satisfy their infant's requirement thereby preventing rickets.

Vitamin D and Rheumatic Diseases: A Review of Clinical Evidence.

Vitamin D plays an important role in maintaining a healthy mineralized skeleton. It is also considered an immunomodulatory agent that regulates innate and adaptive immune systems. The aim of this narrative review is to provide general concepts of vitamin D for the skeletal and immune health, and to summarize the mechanistic, epidemiological, and clinical evidence on the relationship between vitamin D and rheumatic diseases. Multiple observational studies have demonstrated the association between a low level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and the presence and severity of several rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), spondyloarthropathies, and osteoarthritis (OA). Nevertheless, the specific benefits of vitamin D supplements for the treatment and prevention of rheumatic diseases are less accepted as the results from randomized clinical trials are inconsistent, although some conceivable benefits of vitamin D for the improvement of disease activity of RA, SLE, and OA have been demonstrated in meta-analyses. It is also possible that some individuals might benefit from vitamin D differently than others, as inter-individual difference in responsiveness to vitamin D supplementation has been observed in genomic studies. Although the optimal level of serum 25(OH)D is still debatable, it is advisable it is advisable that patients with rheumatic diseases should maintain a serum 25(OH)D level of at least 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) to prevent osteomalacia, secondary osteoporosis, and fracture, and possibly 40-60 ng/mL (100-150 nmol/L) to achieve maximal benefit from vitamin D for immune health and overall health.

A pilot-randomized, double-blind crossover trial to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of orally administered 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and vitamin D3 in healthy adults with differing BMI and in adults with intestinal malabsorption.

BACKGROUND: Obese and malabsorptive patients have difficulty increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] after taking vitamin D supplementation. Since 25(OH)D is more hydrophilic than vitamin D, we hypothesized that oral 25(OH)D supplementation is more effective in increasing serum 25(OH)D concentrations in these patients. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of oral 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] and oral vitamin D3 in healthy participants with differing BMI and malabsorptive patients. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind crossover trial was performed in 6 malabsorptive patients and 10 healthy participants who were given 900 µg of either vitamin D3 or 25(OH)D3 orally followed by a pharmacokinetic study (PKS). After ≥28 d from the first dosing, each participant returned to receive the other form of vitamin D and undergo another PKS. For each PKS, serum vitamin D3 and 25(OH)D3 were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h and days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. RESULTS: Data were expressed as means ± SEMs. The PKS of 900 µg vitamin D3 revealed that malabsorptive patients had 64% lower AUC than healthy participants (1177 ± 425 vs. 3258 ± 496 ng · h/mL; P < 0.05). AUCs of 900 µg 25(OH)D3 were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.540). The 10 healthy participants were ranked by BMI and categorized into higher/lower BMI groups (5/group). The PKS of 900 µg vitamin D3 showed that the higher BMI group had 53% lower AUC than the lower BMI group (2089 ± 490 vs. 4427 ± 313 ng · h/mL; P < 0.05), whereas AUCs of 900 µg 25(OH)D3 were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.500). CONCLUSIONS: Oral 25(OH)D3 may be a good choice for managing vitamin D deficiency in malabsorption and obesity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as (NCT03401541.

Vitamin D and Its Potential Benefit for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Vitamin D is known not only for its importance for bone health but also for its biologic activities on many other organ systems. This is due to the presence of the vitamin D receptor in various types of cells and tissues, including the skin, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, endocrine pancreas, immune cells, and blood vessels. Experimental studies have shown that vitamin D exerts several actions that are thought to be protective against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infectivity and severity. These include the immunomodulatory effects on the innate and adaptive immune systems, the regulatory effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system in the kidneys and the lungs, and the protective effects against endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, studies have shown that vitamin D supplementation is beneficial in protecting against risk of acquiring acute respiratory viral infection and may improve outcomes in sepsis and critically ill patients. There are a growing number of data connecting COVID-19 infectivity and severity with vitamin D status, suggesting a potential benefit of vitamin D supplementation for primary prevention or as an adjunctive treatment of COVID-19. Although the results from most ongoing randomized clinical trials aiming to prove the benefit of vitamin D supplementation for these purposes are still pending, there is no downside to increasing vitamin D intake and having sensible sunlight exposure to maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at a level of least 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) and preferably 40 to 60 ng/mL (100-150 nmol/L) to minimize the risk of COVID-19 infection and its severity.

Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status in community-dwelling elderly patients with mild-to-moderate kidney impairment.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) status in patients with early kidney impairment is limited. We aimed to determine the associations among kidney function, vitamin D, and PTH status in community-dwelling elderly patients with mild-to-moderate kidney impairment. METHODS: Community-dwelling elderly patients were enrolled in this Institutional Review Board approved cross-sectional study. The eligibility criteria were as follows: age > 60 years, no recent hospitalization within the past 12 months, no conditions that affect vitamin D status including vitamin D supplementation, and eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were enrolled. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. The mean serum 25(OH)D was 26.61 ± 10.44 ng/mL and the mean serum PTH was 50.67 ± 22.67 pg/mL. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency [25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL] and secondary hyperparathyroidism [PTH > 65 pg/mL] were 25.3% and 18.1%, respectively. Patients with eGFR 30- < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 had significantly higher prevalence of 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL (33.7% versus 19.4%, p < 0.05) than patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multiple regression analysis showed independent negative association of serum PTH level with eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2, ß: - 0.261, 95% CI [- 0.408, - 0.114]) and serum 25(OH)D (ng/mL, ß: - 0.499, 95% CI [- 0.775, - 0.223], adjusted for possible confounders). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was higher in patients with eGFR 30 - < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 than those with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Both decreased serum 25(OH)D levels and decreased eGFR were independently associated with increased serum PTH levels among these patients.

Immunologic Effects of Vitamin D on Human Health and Disease.

Vitamin D is responsible for regulation of calcium and phosphate metabolism and maintaining a healthy mineralized skeleton. It is also known as an immunomodulatory hormone. Experimental studies have shown that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, the active form of vitamin D, exerts immunologic activities on multiple components of the innate and adaptive immune system as well as endothelial membrane stability. Association between low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased risk of developing several immune-related diseases and disorders, including psoriasis, type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculosis, sepsis, respiratory infection, and COVID-19, has been observed. Accordingly, a number of clinical trials aiming to determine the efficacy of administration of vitamin D and its metabolites for treatment of these diseases have been conducted with variable outcomes. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that some individuals might benefit from vitamin D more or less than others as high inter-individual difference in broad gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to vitamin D supplementation has been observed. Although it is still debatable what level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is optimal, it is advisable to increase vitamin D intake and have sensible sunlight exposure to maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at least 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L), and preferably at 40-60 ng/mL (100-150 nmol/L) to achieve the optimal overall health benefits of vitamin D.

Variable Genomic and Metabolomic Responses to Varying Doses of Vitamin D Supplementation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the impact of vitamin D supplementation on genomic and metabolomic profiles and relate them to the individual's responsiveness to varying doses of vitamin D3 Patients and Methods: Healthy adults were given either 600, 4000 or 10,000 IUs vitamin D3/day for 6 months. Circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], calcium, peripheral white blood cells broad gene expression and urine and serum metabolomic profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: There was a dose-dependent effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25(OH)D, PTH and broad gene expression. Serum calcium levels remained normal for all study subjects and no untoward toxicity was observed. The metabolomic profiles were related to the genomic expression analysis. There were significant inter-individual effects on gene expression and metabolomic profile in response to the same dose of vitamin D3 supplementation, despite similar changes in 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations. CONCLUSION: These results may help explain the variability observed in clinical trials regarding vitamin D's non-calcemic health benefits.

The Effect of Various Doses of Oral Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Dose-response Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on gut microbiota. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty adults with vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency [25(OH)D <30 ng/ml] were enrolled and given 600, 4,000 or 10,000 IUs/day of oral vitamin D3 Stool samples were collected at baseline and 8 weeks for identifying gut microbiota using 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing. RESULTS: Baseline serum 25(OH)D was associated with increased relative abundance of Akkermansia and decreased relative abundance of Porphyromonas (p<0.05). After the intervention, we observed a dose-dependent increase in relative abundance of Bacteroides with a significant difference between the 600 IUs and the 10,000 IUs groups (p=0.027), and Parabacteroides with a significant difference between the 600 IUs and the 4,000 IUs groups (p=0.039). CONCLUSION: Increased serum 25(OH)D was associated with increased beneficial bacteria and decreased pathogenic bacteria. A dose-dependent increase in bacteria associated with decreased inflammatory bowel disease activity was observed after vitamin D3 supplementation.

Vitamin D for skeletal and non-skeletal health: What we should know.

Vitamin D plays an essential role in regulating calcium and phosphate metabolism and maintaining a healthy mineralized skeleton. Humans obtain vitamin D from sunlight exposure, dietary foods and supplements. There are two forms of vitamin D: vitamin D3 and vitamin D2. Vitamin D3 is synthesized endogenously in the skin and found naturally in oily fish and cod liver oil. Vitamin D2 is synthesized from ergosterol and found in yeast and mushrooms. Once vitamin D enters the circulation it is converted by 25-hydroxylase in the liver to 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], which is further converted by the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase in the kidneys to the active form, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D]. 1,25(OH)2D binds to its nuclear vitamin D receptor to exert its physiologic functions. These functions include: promotion of intestinal calcium and phosphate absorption, renal tubular calcium reabsorption, and calcium mobilization from bone. The Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guideline defines vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency, and sufficiency as serum concentrations of 25(OH)D of <20 ng/mL, 21-29 ng/mL, and 30-100 ng/mL, respectively. Vitamin D deficiency is a major global public health problem in all age groups. It is estimated that 1 billion people worldwide have vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. This pandemic of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is attributed to a modern lifestyle and environmental factors that restrict sunlight exposure, which is essential for endogenous synthesis of vitamin D in the skin. Vitamin D deficiency is the most common cause of rickets and osteomalacia, and can exacerbate osteoporosis. It is also associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain, muscle weakness, and an increased risk of falling. In addition, several observational studies observed the association between robust levels of serum 25(OH)D in the range of 40-60 ng/mL with decreased mortality and risk of development of several types of chronic diseases. Therefore, vitamin D-deficient patients should be treated with vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 supplementation to achieve an optimal level of serum 25(OH)D. Screening of vitamin D deficiency by measuring serum 25(OH)D is recommended in individuals at risk such as patients with diseases affecting vitamin D metabolism and absorption, osteoporosis, and older adults with a history of falls or nontraumatic fracture. It is important to know if a laboratory assay measures total 25(OH)D or only 25(OH)D3. Using assays that measure only 25(OH)D3 could underestimate total levels of 25(OH)D and may mislead physicians who treat patients with vitamin D2 supplementation.

The ongoing D-lemma of vitamin D supplementation for nonskeletal health and bone health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review is to give some perspective on the results and conclusions of three recent randomized controlled vitamin D intervention studies that have challenged the health benefit of vitamin D supplementation for reducing risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer, all-cause mortality and type 2 diabetes and improving bone health. RECENT FINDINGS: Vitamin D supplementation to adults who were vitamin D sufficient or insufficient did not reduce risk for developing cardiovascular disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes nor increases bone mineral density (BMD). Patients who were vitamin D deficient with cancer and received vitamin D reduced risk for mortality by 25% and prediabetic adults who were vitamin D deficient and received vitamin D reduced their risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 62%. Older adults receiving 4000 and 10 000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily for 3 years had reduced radial BMD but had no change in either total hip areal bone density or bone strength in the radius and tibia. SUMMARY: Caution is needed when evaluating results and conclusions from randomized controlled trials that investigate health benefits of vitamin D; most studies suggest health benefits when vitamin D supplementation is provided to vitamin D deficient populations and little benefit when given to populations that are vitamin D sufficient/insufficient.