Efficacy of microsurgical vascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of the long-term efficacy of microvascular decompression surgery in trigeminal neuralgia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study included patients undergoing microvascular decompression surgery for trigeminal neuralgia after failure of well-conducted medical or complementary therapy, with visualization of nerve compression syndrome on MRI. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included. Nerve compression was alleviated without interposition of polytetrafluoroethylene in 79.3% of cases. Postoperative efficacy on pain was immediate in 97.7% of cases. There were no postoperative deaths, and the rate of severe complications was low (2.3%). The efficacy of microvascular decompression surgery was total at 2 years in 90.8% of cases and at 10 years in 92.3%, without resumption of medical treatment. The failure rate was 10.3%; 26.3% of these patients had been previously treated by a lesional technique (P: 0.043) and 33.3% by interposition of polytetrafluoroethylene (P: 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: With confirmed clinical and radiological diagnosis, microvascular decompression surgery for trigeminal nerve compression was safe, with total effectiveness in the immediate, short and long terms. It should be considered in first line in case of failure or intolerance of well-conducted medical treatment.

[Tinnitus treatment: neurosurgical management]. / Traitement des acouphènes: aspects neurochirurgicaux.

Tinnitus is a very frequent symptom affecting 10% of the general population. It corresponds to the perception of an internal noise that can severely impair the quality of life. Tinnitus management requires a multidisciplinary approach in which neuromodulation and neurosurgery tend to play major roles. Classification of tinnitus separates objective tinnitus (i.e., tinnitus that can be heard or recorded) from the more frequent subjective tinnitus (i.e., tinnitus only perceived by the patient). Objective tinnitus is either pulsatile synchronous with heartbeat or asynchronous. In the former, appropriate radiological testing should search for a vascular abnormality as well as other neurological diseases (intracranial hypertension, Arnold-Chiari malformation, vascular loops, etc.). Asynchronous objective tinnitus generally corresponds to muscular contractions that require specific management. The pathophysiology of subjective tinnitus is more complex, showing strong analogies with postamputation pain syndromes. After peripheral middle ear or inner ear damage, auditory deafferentation could result in hyperactivity and/or functional reorganization within central auditory and nonauditory structures. This could explain the persistence of tinnitus after total hearing amputation (e.g., translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma) and associated symptoms such as hyperacusis or anxiety and depression. This central model finds strong support in animal experiments and in functional neuroimagery (PET, fMRI, MEG). Since no etiologically based therapies are currently available, severe subjective tinnitus management only targets tinnitus tolerance with sound enrichment or cognitive behavior therapy. However, in the near future better knowledge of tinnitus pathophysiology and innovative therapeutic tools could emerge from neuromodulation techniques such as repeated transcranial magnetic or epidural electric stimulation.

Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties in humans.

To investigate the involvement of the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) in outer hair cell (OHC) motility stabilization, evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) were recorded in 20 normal-hearing subjects and in eight vestibular-neurotomized subjects, successively in the presence and absence of low-intensity contralateral acoustic stimulation. Intrasubject EOAE amplitude variability was assessed as the standard deviation computed over several successive recordings. In normal-hearing subjects, a significantly lower EOAE amplitude variability with contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) was observed in subjects in whom the CAS induced the greatest EOAE amplitude reduction. This result could not be attributed to the EOAE amplitude reduction itself, since variability was otherwise found to increase when EOAE amplitude decreased. Moreover, statistically significant correlations between EOAE amplitude attenuation and EOAE amplitude variability under CAS were observed. In the eight subjects operated for vestibular neurotomy, no such effect was found. Being sectioned in vestibular-neurotomized subjects, the MOCS can no longer exert its effects. These results strongly support the notion that MOCS activity, as induced by CAS, elicits a reduction in EOAE amplitude variability in normal-hearing subjects. This finding and some of its possible implications for understanding the role of the MOCS in hearing in humans are discussed.

On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies.

Earlier we presented data (Scharf et al. (1994) Hear. Res. 75, 11-26) from a young patient (S.B.) who had undergone a vestibular neurotomy, during which the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) was severed. Those data are complemented by measurements on 15 other patients-some like S.B. with normal audiometric thresholds, none with a loss greater than 35 dB at experimental frequencies. Comparisons of performance for the same ear before and after surgery or between the operated and healthy ears do not provide evidence that the lack of OCB input impairs the following psychoacoustical functions: (1) detection of tonal signals, (2) intensity discrimination, (3) frequency selectivity, (4) loudness adaptation, (5) frequency discrimination within a tonal series, (6) in-head lateralization. Data on single-tone frequency discrimination are equivocal. These mostly negative results apply to listening both in the quiet and, where relevant, in noise. The only clear change in hearing after a vestibular neurotomy is that most patients detect signals at unexpected frequencies better than before. This change suggests an impaired ability to focus attention in the frequency domain. Although limited in scope, our finding that human hearing without OCB input is essentially normal agrees with much of the relevant literature on animal behavior and with the patients' self-reports.

Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?

To test the hypothesis of temporal modifications of cochlear responses when medial efferents are activated, otoacoustic emission latencies were estimated in 16 normal human subjects, in the presence and absence of a contralateral broadband noise, using measurements of the phase of the 2f1-f2 distortion product (group latency method). Significant decrease in the latency of lower frequency (0.8-2.7 kHz) emissions was found in the presence of increasing levels of contralateral sound, and this effect disappeared when the primary-tone levels increased to 60 dB SPL. To ensure that effects were not attributable to mechanisms involving middle ear structures, susceptible to activation by contralateral sound, latency measures were performed in seven subjects whose efferents were severed during a vestibular neurotomy and in two subjects with paralyzed stapedial muscle. Results in patients were compared to those obtained in three surgical control patients with intact efferent bundle, and in eight other normal subjects. All the subject groups exhibited a decrease in latency under contralateral sound except the patients with the severed efferent system who showed increased latencies.

On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: a case study.

A young patient with normal pure-tone thresholds in both ears underwent a unilateral vestibular neurotomy in January 1992 to relieve severe vertigo ascribed to Ménière's disease. Evidence is provided that the whole vestibular nerve including the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) was sectioned. Just prior to the surgery, the patient was examined in several psychoacoustic tests involving mainly signal detection and selective attention. Over the next 20 months, he was reexamined in those same tests. The patient's ability to detect expected tones in the quiet (including audiograms) or in noise was the same as before the surgery. The one change was a marked improvement in the detection of unexpected signals in noise, which appears to reflect impaired selective attention. During those 20 months, new tests were also performed on discrimination, loudness, pitch, lateralization, and temporary threshold shift. On these tests, the only differences between the operated and unoperated ears concerned binaural diplacusis and loudness adaptation close to threshold, but these differences may well have been present prior to the surgery. Except with respect to what is probably selective attention, we uncovered no other clear role for the OCB in hearing. This outcome agrees with limited measurements on other patients, with their subjective reports, and with a number of published neurophysiological observations.