RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal antibiotic regimen for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is controversial. Although ß-lactam monotherapy is common, data to guide the choice between antibiotics are scarce. We aimed to compare ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive monotherapy. METHODS: A multinational retrospective study (9 countries, 25 centers) including 767 hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with ß-lactam monotherapy during 2009-2015. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate, including propensity-adjusted, analyses were conducted introducing monotherapy type as an independent variable. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 37/213 (17.4%), 42/210 (20%), and 55/344 (16%) in the ceftazidime, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam groups, respectively. Type of monotherapy was not significantly associated with mortality in either univariate, multivariate, or propensity-adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-2.46, for ceftazidime; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.67-2.51, for piperacillin-tazobactam, with carbapenems as reference in propensity adjusted multivariate analysis; 542 patients). No significant difference between antibiotics was demonstrated for clinical failure, microbiological failure, or adverse events. Isolation of P. aeruginosa with new resistance to antipseudomonal drugs was significantly more frequent with carbapenems (36/206 [17.5%]) versus ceftazidime (25/201 [12.4%]) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28/332 [8.4%] (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in mortality, clinical, and microbiological outcomes or adverse events was demonstrated between ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive treatment of P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Higher rates of resistant P. aeruginosa after patients were treated with carbapenems, along with the general preference for carbapenem-sparing regimens, suggests using ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam for treating susceptible infection.
Assuntos
Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to describe the microbiology and susceptibility patterns in acute cholecystitis by examining bile culture results from patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy and examine concordance with empiric treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients with acute cholecystitis underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy between 2003 and 2012 at Emek Medical Center, Israel. Data on bile and blood culture results, isolate susceptibility, and clinical outcomes were retrieved from patient files. RESULTS: Bile cultures obtained from 116 patients were positive in 70 (60.3%) patients. Blood cultures obtained from 77 patients were positive in 23 (31.1%). Escherichia coli was the most common isolate in 28.6% of bile cultures and 43.5% of blood cultures. The concordance between empiric treatment coverage and culture isolate susceptibility was 67.6%. In most discordant cases, the isolates were Enterobacter spp. (40.9%) and Enterococcus spp. (31.8%). Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate was 7%: 2% in patients with concordant treatment compared with 14% in patients with discordant treatment (p = 0.09). Empiric antibiotic regimens were adequate in only two-thirds of patients. CONCLUSIONS: There might be a trend for poorer outcome in patients treated with inadequate antibiotic agents, emphasizing the importance of tailoring antibiotic treatment.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bile/microbiologia , Colecistite Aguda/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Colecistite Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Colecistostomia , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, there has been renewed interest in old drugs that have fallen into disuse because of toxic side effects. One such drug is chloramphenicol. Data on the use and susceptibility patterns to chloramphenicol in developed countries in recent years are limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the susceptibility of bacteria to chloramphenicol, and evaluate the use of chloramphenicol in Israeli hospitals as influenced by infectious disease specialists' attitudes with regard to its potential harms. METHODS: A national survey was conducted in all Israeli hospitals. Questionnaires were sent to the directors of infectious disease units and included items on chloramphenicol susceptibility in clinical isolates, use of chloramphenicol for the treatment of inpatients, local recommendations for use of chloramphenicol, and concerns regarding side effects. RESULTS: Chloramphenicol is used in 83.3% of hospitals, mostly for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia. While 22.2% of infectious disease unit directors believe that chloramphenicol should be avoided because of dangerous side effects, 88.9% believe there is a place for chloramphenicol in the treatment of patients in this era of increasing antibiotic resistance. Chloramphenicol susceptibility is routinely assessed in 44.4% of hospitals, with high susceptibility rates found among gram-positive, gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance, many Israeli infectious disease unit directors believe that chloramphenicol has a role in the treatment of respiratory tract and other infections in hospitalized patients.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Anaeróbias/efeitos dos fármacos , Cloranfenicol/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cloranfenicol/efeitos adversos , Cloranfenicol/farmacologia , Coleta de Dados , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Israel , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is the leading cause of antibiotic associated colitis and nosocomial diarrhea. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing C. difficile infection (CDI), have worse outcomes of CDI-including higher rates of colectomy and death, and experience higher rates of recurrence. However, it is still not clear whether C. difficile is a cause of IBD or a consequence of the inflammatory state in the intestinal environment. The burden of CDI has increased dramatically over the past decade, with severe outbreaks described in many countries, which have been attributed to a new and more virulent strain. A parallel rise in the incidence of CDI has been noted in patients with IBD. IBD patients with CDI tend be younger, have less prior antibiotic exposure, and most cases of CDI in these patients represent outpatient acquired infections. The clinical presentation of CDI in these patients can be unique-including diversion colitis, enteritis and pouchitis, and typical findings on colonoscopy are often absent. Due to the high prevalence of CDI in patients hospitalized with an IBD exacerbation, and the prognostic implications of CDI in these patients, it is recommended to test all IBD patients hospitalized with a disease flare for C. difficile. Treatment includes general measures such as supportive care and infection control measures. Antibiotic therapy with either oral metronidazole, vancomycin, or the novel antibiotic-fidaxomicin, should be initiated as soon as possible. Fecal macrobiota transplantation constitutes another optional treatment for severe/recurrent CDI. The aim of this paper is to review recent data on CDI in IBD: role in pathogenesis, diagnostic methods, optional treatments, and outcomes of these patients.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidade , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/microbiologia , Intestinos/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Biológica , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Progressão da Doença , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/imunologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/terapia , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/imunologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Intestinos/imunologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , VirulênciaRESUMO
Recent exposure to azoles is an important risk factor for infection with fluconazole-resistant Candida spp., but little is known about the role of antibacterial drug exposure in the emergence of drug-resistant Candida. We did a prospective nationwide surveillance study of candidemia in Israel and analyzed the propensity score-adjusted association between antifungal and antibacterial drug exposure and bloodstream infection with C. glabrata and fluconazole-resistant Candida isolates. Four hundred forty-four episodes of candidemia (450 Candida isolates, 69 [15%] C. glabrata isolates, and 38 [8.5%] fluconazole-resistant isolates) from 18 medical centers in Israel were included. C. glabrata bloodstream infection was strongly associated with recent metronidazole exposure (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; P < 0.001). Infection with a fluconazole-resistant isolate was associated with exposure to carbapenems, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, and colistin (odds ratio, 2.8; P = 0.01). The inclusion of antibacterial drug exposure in a multivariable model significantly enhanced the model's predictive accuracy for fluconazole-resistant Candida bloodstream infection. Our findings may be relevant to the selection of empirical antifungal treatment and broaden the scope of antibiotic-associated collateral damage.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Candida glabrata/efeitos dos fármacos , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Fluconazol/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Candida glabrata/fisiologia , Candidemia/etiologia , Candidemia/microbiologia , Candidíase/etiologia , Candidíase/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/administração & dosagem , Carbapenêmicos/efeitos adversos , Clindamicina/administração & dosagem , Clindamicina/efeitos adversos , Coinfecção , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Feminino , Fluconazol/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Israel , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/administração & dosagem , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identification of pathogens and their susceptibility to antimicrobials is mandatory for successful empiric antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical characteristics of patients with bacteremia, as well as the bacterial distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility in community, hospital and long-term care facilities during two periods (2001-2002 and 2005-2006). METHODS: The study was conducted at the HaEmek Medical Center, a community 500-bed teaching hospital in northern Israel serving a population of approximately 500,000 inhabitants. All episodes of bacteremia (n = 1546) during two 2 year periods (2001-2 and 2005-6) were prospectively recorded, evaluated and compared (755 in 2001-2 and 791 in 2005-6). RESULTS: In both periods the urinary tract was the main port of entry in community and long-term care facility bacteremia, while the urinary tract--primary and catheter-related--were similar in frequency as sources of hospital bacteremia. Escherichia coli was the most frequent pathogen isolate. No significant changes in the frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria were seen between the two 2 year periods (2001-2 and 2005-6). The susceptibility of non-ESBL-producing E. coli decreased for some antibiotics while non-ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae susceptibility profile improved in the same period. A non-statistically significant trend of increased resistance in gram-negative isolates to quinolones, piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam was observed, but most isolates still remained highly susceptible to carbapenems. There was a small increase in mortality rate in hospital bacteremia during the second period. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous surveillance is imperative for monitoring the local epidemiology and for developing local treatment guidelines.