RESUMO
Oxidative stress-related DNA damage is a significant pathology for male subfertility and unexplained infertility (UI). Antioxidant supplement by food or nutrition may benefit sperm function of UI couples. However, the role of antioxidant status on fertilization outcome and embryo development for UI couples is not clear. A total of 63 semen samples from UI couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment (26 pregnant cycles and 37 nonpregnant cycles) were recruited for this prospective observational study. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels of sperm cells are detected by a chemiluminescence assay. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of seminal plasma is evaluated according to an antioxidant assay kit. The skin carotenoid status in the male partners of UI couples is measured by resonance Raman spectroscopy to determine the antioxidant potential from dietary supplement. The skin carotenoid status (23,115 ± 6,831 vs. 19,432 ± 5,242 Raman intensity, p = .0329 by Mann-Whitney U test) and day 3 good embryo rates (49.6 ± 27.1% vs. 26.8 ± 23.1%, p = .002 by Mann-Whitney U test) are higher in pregnant cycles compared to those in nonpregnant cycles. The local antioxidant capacity (seminal TAC) is closely correlated with fertilization rates (r = .35, p = .005). In contrast, skin carotenoid status is intimately associated with good embryo rates in IVF cycles (r = .34, p = .007). In conclusion, the skin carotenoid status of male partners of UI couples may benefit embryo development and the subsequent pregnancy outcome of IVF treatment. Further investigation about the effect and mechanism of nutritional supplement on embryo development in IVF cycles for UI couples is deserved.
RESUMO
Background: Monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (m-TURP) remains the gold standard for benign prostate obstruction (BPO). Recently developed laser surgical technique provides fewer peri-operative complications with equivalent outcomes. Diode laser vaporesection (DiLRP) offers better hemostasis, shorter catheterization duration, and shorter hospital stay, however, deep thermal penetration might cause prolonged prostatic urethra inflammation and subsequent complications. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the pyuria duration and post-operative urinary tract infection sequelae (POUTIs) between DiLRP and m-TURP. Methods: From July 2011 to September 2015, we retrieved medical records for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from prostate obstruction who underwent m-TURP and DiLRP. Demographic characteristics were recorded from a computerized database. The duration of pyuria after operation was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Results: One hundred twelve patients underwent DiLRP and 81 underwent m-TURP performed by the same surgeon during the same period. The mean age of the patients was 72 ± 7.3 years in the DiLRP group and 70 ± 7.6 years in the m-TURP group (p = 0.069). There was a higher percentage of anticoagulant used in the DiLRP group than in the m-TURP group (18.5% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.028). Operation time was longer but post-operative normal saline irrigation interval was shorter in DiLRP compared with m-TURP, respectively (62.8 ± 20.6 vs. 47.4 ± 22.1 minutes, p < 0.001; 2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 days, p < 0.001). The post-operative infections were statistically significantly higher in the DiLRP group, including epididymitis (10.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.013) and POUTIs-related hospitalization (8.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.031).The DiLRP resulted in longer pyuria period (16 vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.0014), with factors including operative method by DiLRP (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.828, p = 0.003) and age (HR: 0.665, p = 0.040). Conclusions: According to our study, DiLRP associated with more POUTIs is possibly caused by a longer pyuria period. Further larger prospective studies are necessary for the evaluation of the association between post-operative pyuria and POUTIs.