Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 62(4): 1043-1050, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28194668

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia are common complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), especially in high-risk patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a raw rhubarb solution can reduce the incidence of PEP and post-ERCP hyperamylasemia. METHODS: From October 2012 to October 2013, 2100 patients received ERCP in our Endoscopic Center. Five hundred patients with high-risk factors were enrolled randomly into the raw rhubarb group (RG, 250 cases drank a raw rhubarb soak solution per 3 h until defecation after ERCP) and the control group (CG, 250 cases drank water after ERCP) in the study. The serum amylase concentration was measured. The abdominal pain, purge time and symptoms of patients were observed in the two groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient demographics, medical history, ERCP procedure, and patient- and procedure-related high-risk factors between the two groups. PEP incidence was 2% (5/250) in the RG group, which was lower than that in the CG group (7.6%, 19/250) (P < 0.01). The rate of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia was 5.2% (13/250) and 16.8% (42/250) in the RG group and CG group, respectively. The incidence of hyperamylasemia in the RG group was significantly lower than that in the CG group (P < 0.01). The incidence of abdominal pain 24 h after ERCP in the RG group was lower than that in the CG group (P < 0.01). No side effects were observed for raw rhubarb solution. CONCLUSIONS: A raw rhubarb solution is safe and effective in preventing the incidence of PEP and hyperamylasemia in high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/prevenção & controle , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Rheum , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Projetos Piloto , Extratos Vegetais/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Risco
2.
Adv Ther ; 32(11): 1160-76, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26581750

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High-dose intravenous esomeprazole is the only approved pharmacological treatment for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding (currently approved in over 100 countries worldwide), but has not yet been approved in China. This study aimed to evaluate a high-dose esomeprazole intravenous regimen vs. an active control (cimetidine) for the prevention of rebleeding in Chinese patients with a high risk of peptic ulcer rebleeding who had undergone primary endoscopic hemostatic treatment. METHODS: This was a parallel-group study conducted at 20 centers in China. The study comprised a randomized, double-blind, intravenous treatment phase of 72 h in which 215 patients received either high-dose esomeprazole (80 mg + 8 mg/h) or cimetidine (200 mg + 60 mg/h), followed by an open-label oral treatment phase in which all patients received esomeprazole 40 mg tablets once daily for 27 days. The primary outcome was the rate of clinically significant rebleeding within the first 72 h after initial endoscopic hemostatic therapy. Secondary outcomes included the rates of clinically significant rebleeding within 7 and 30 days; proportions of patients who had endoscopic retreatment and other surgery due to rebleeding; and number of blood units transfused. RESULTS: The rate of clinically significant rebleeding within 72 h was low overall (3.3%) and numerically lower in patients treated with esomeprazole compared with cimetidine (0.9% vs. 5.6%). Overall, the results of the secondary outcomes also showed a numerical trend towards superiority of esomeprazole over cimetidine. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this phase 3, multicenter, randomized trial conducted in China, esomeprazole showed a numerical trend towards superior clinical benefit over cimetidine in the prevention of rebleeding in patients who had successfully undergone initial hemostatic therapy of a bleeding peptic ulcer, with a similar safety and tolerability profile. These findings suggest that esomeprazole may be an alternative treatment option to cimetidine for this indication in China. FUNDING: AstraZeneca. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01757275.


Assuntos
Esomeprazol/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , China , Cimetidina/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Esomeprazol/administração & dosagem , Esomeprazol/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Hemostase Endoscópica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/etiologia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Prevenção Secundária , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA