Chiropractic website claims related to non-musculoskeletal conditions: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Chiropractors frequently use spinal manipulation therapy as a treatment modality in the management of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions such as spinal pain and sometimes in the treatment of non-MSK disorders. The latter is not supported by evidence. This study aimed to investigate the extent of non-MSK website claims from French chiropractors to assess if websites were aligned with current recommendations on evidence-based practice. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of French chiropractors. Information on non-MSK conditions was collected from chiropractic professional websites by two independent observers in June 2020. For each non-MSK condition, it was noted whether a clarifying explanation justifying the mentioning of the condition was available. In addition, data on professional association affiliation status, country of education, years since graduation, and special clinical focus (e.g., seniors, children) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 287 randomly selected websites were included in the study corresponding to 22% of all chiropractors registered in France. One or more of 42 different non-MSK conditions were identified on 231 websites, of which 5 (2.2%) provided a clarifying explanation. 226 (79%) websites mentioned a non-MSK condition without a clarifying explanation. The non-MSK conditions most often mentioned were sleep problems, constipation/digestive problems, unease/discontent in children and menstrual cramps/pains. A larger proportion of the websites advertising treatment for non-MSK disorders was found among those claiming a special clinical focus on infants/children, seniors, pregnant women or athletes compared to those that did not. Also, a larger proportion of chiropractors who were affiliated with a professional association were advertising treatment for non-MSK disorders compared to those who were not affiliated. CONCLUSIONS: Eight out of ten chiropractic websites mentioned one or more non-MSK diagnoses or symptoms. It is unclear if this reflects inaccurate communication or if treatments for non-MSK conditions are provided by the chiropractors.

Learning Spinal Manipulation: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Performance.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between objective spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) biomechanical parameters and subjective assessments provided by patients, clinicians, and expert assessors. METHODS: Chiropractic students (N = 137) and expert instructors (N = 14) were recruited. Students were asked to perform a thoracic SMT alternately on each other on a force-sensing table while being observed by an expert instructor. Students who performed (clinicians) and received (patients) SMT, and expert instructors, independently scored each SMT performance using visual analog scales. Correlations between these subjective scores and SMT biomechanical parameters were calculated. The following parameters were evaluated: peak force, preload force, thrust duration, and drop in preload force. Spinal manipulation therapy comfort was also assessed by patients, clinicians, and expert instructors. RESULTS: Results of the study indicate that thrust duration assessed by instructors and patients was the only parameters significantly correlated with the table data (r = .37; P < .001 and r = .26; P = .002). Comfort assessed by clinicians was significantly correlated with their own assessments of thrust duration (r = .37; P < .001) and preload force (r = .23; P = .007), whereas comfort assessed by instructors was significantly correlated with their own assessment of thrust duration (r = .27; P = .002) and drop in preload force (r = -.34; P < .001). Objective biomechanical parameters of performance did not predict perceived comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results from the subjective assessments of SMT performance are weakly correlated with objective measures of SMT performance. Only the thrust duration evaluated by expert instructors and patients was associated with scores obtained from the table. Perceived comfort of the procedure seems to be associated mostly with perceived thrust duration and preload characteristics.

The Effect of Augmented Feedback and Expertise on Spinal Manipulation Skills: An Experimental Study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the combined effect of augmented feedback and expertise on the performance and retention of basic motor learning spinal manipulation skills. METHODS: A total of 103 chiropractic students with various training expertise were recruited for the study. Participants were evaluated at baseline, immediately after trials of augmented feedback practice and 1 week later. During all 3 assessments, students were asked to perform several trials of the same spinal manipulation, for which the maximum preload force, onset of thrust, thrust duration, force and peak force, thrust duration, rate of force application, and any drop in preload force were calculated. The constant error, absolute error, and variable error were calculated for the 3 experimental blocks of trials. RESULTS: Results confirmed that augmented feedback training modified several biomechanical parameters such as the rate of force application, the preload force, and the drop in preload force. The study also confirmed that many biomechanical parameters, including thrust duration and rate of force application, are modified with expertise but failed to identify any interaction effect between expertise and augmented feedback training effects. CONCLUSION: The study determined that expertise did not influence how students performed after a session of augmented feedback training. The study also determined that augmented feedback related to the global performance can yield improvements in several basic components of the spinal manipulation task. These results should be interpreted considering basic motor learning principles and specific learning environments.

Systematic Augmented Feedback and Dependency in Spinal Manipulation Learning: a Randomized Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate if systematic augmented feedback during short sessions of spinal manipulation (SM) training creates a dependency compared with short training session characterized by progressive withdrawal of augmented feedback. METHODS: Forty fourth- and fifth-year chiropractic students enrolled in a 5-year chiropractic program were randomized into 2 groups. The 2 groups performed the same number of SM with a 300-N peak force target on an instrumented device. Baseline assessment consisted of 10 trials without feedback. Three training blocks of 10 SMs were then performed with visual and verbal feedback. For the control group, feedback was always provided. For the experimental group, augmented feedback was provided for each trial of the first training block, 50% of the second block, and 20% of the last training block. A postintervention assessment of 10 trials without feedback was performed, and a retention assessment was conducted 20 minutes later. RESULTS: No group main effect was found on biomechanical parameters and error variables. A main effect of learning for the absolute error was observed, suggesting that short sessions of feedback training improve participants' accuracy. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that feedback scheduling does not influence SM motor performance and learning in clinically experienced students.

Learning spinal manipulation: the effect of expertise on transfer capability.

OBJECTIVE: Transfer capability represents the changes in performance in one task that result from practice or experience in other related tasks. Increased transfer capability has been associated with expertise in several motor tasks. The purpose of this study was to investigate if expertise in spinal manipulation therapy, assessed in groups of trainees and experienced chiropractors, is associated with increased transfer capabilities. METHODS: Forty-nine chiropractic students (fifth- and sixth-year students) and experienced chiropractors were asked to perform blocks of 10 thoracic spine manipulations in 3 different conditions: preferred position and table setting, increased table height, and unstable support surface. Spinal manipulations were performed on a computer-connected device developed to emulate a prone thoracic spine manipulation. Thrust duration, thrust force rate of force application, and preload force were obtained for each trial and compared across groups and conditions. RESULTS: Results indicated that both expertise and performance conditions modulated the biomechanical parameters of spinal manipulation. Decreased thrust duration and increased rate of force application were observed in experienced clinicians, whereas thrust force and thrust rate of force application were significantly decreased when task difficulty was increased. Increasing task difficulty also led to significant increases in performance variability. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study suggests that when instructed to perform spinal manipulation in a challenging context, trainees and experts choose to modulate force to optimize thrust duration, a characteristic feature of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation. Given its known association with motor proficiency, transfer capability assessments should be considered in spinal manipulative therapy training.