Suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) characteristics in people with Parkinson's disease compared to healthy controls.

The suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) is a newly described indicator of vestibular function which yields two measures: vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and a saccadic response. It is an alternative and complementary test to the head impulse test paradigm (HIMP). Parkinson's disease (PD) has known saccadic and central vestibular pathway dysfunction. This paper is the first description of SHIMP VOR gain and saccade characteristic in this population. This prospective observational study measured the SHIMP VOR gain and saccade characteristics in 39 participants with idiopathic PD and compared this to 40 healthy controls (HC). The effect of group, demographic variables and SHIMP characteristics were evaluated. SHIMP VOR gains were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.10). Compared to HC, the PD group mean SHIMP peak saccade velocity was significantly reduced by an average of 77.07°/sec (p < 0.001), and SHIMP saccade response latency was longer, with an average delay of 23.5 ms (p = 0.003). SHIMP saccade peak velocity was also associated with both head impulse velocity (p = 0.002) and SHIMP VOR gain (p = 0.004) variables, but there was no significant influence of these variables when SHIMP saccade peak velocity was considered as a predictor of PD (p = 0.52-0.91). VOR gains were unaffected by PD. PD-specific saccadic dysfunction, namely reduced peak saccade velocities and prolonged response latencies, were observed in the SHIMP-induced saccade responses. VOR gain using slow phase eye velocity is preferred as the indicator of vestibular function in the SHIMPs paradigm as non-vestibular factors affected saccade peak velocity.

Static and dynamic otolith reflex function in people with Parkinson's disease.

PURPOSE: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction. This study reports the transient and sustained functions of the otoliths and their reflex pathways in PD compared to healthy controls (HC) and determines if otolith function relates to previous fall history. METHODS: Forty participants with PD and 40 HC had their otolith function assessed. Transient saccular and utricular-mediated reflexes were assessed by cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs, respectively) elicited by air-conducted stimulus (clicks) and bone-conducted vibration (light tendon hammer taps). Static otolith function was assessed by the Curator Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test. RESULTS: Compared to HC, the PD group had significantly more absent cVEMP responses to both clicks (47.5% vs. 30%, respectively, p = 0.03) and taps (21.8% vs. 5%, respectively, p = 0.002). Only the PD group had bilaterally absent tap cVEMPs, this was related to previous falls history (p < 0. 001). In both groups, click oVEMPs were predominantly absent, and tap oVEMPs were predominantly present. The PD group had smaller tap oVEMP amplitudes (p = 0.03) and recorded more abnormal SVV responses (p = 0.01) and greater error on SVV compared to HC, p < 0.001. SVV had no relationship with VEMP responses (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: PD impacts on cVEMP reflex pathways but not tap oVEMP reflex pathways. Bone-conducted otolith stimuli (taps) are more robust than air-conducted sound stimuli (clicks) for both o and cVEMPs. A lack of association between SVV and VEMP responses suggest that static and dynamic otolith functions are differentially affected in PD.

The role of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in the assessment of patients with vestibular schwannomas.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of VEMPs in patients suffering from unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) and to determine the optimal stimulation parameter (air conducted sound, bone conducted vibration) for evaluating the function of the vestibular nerve. METHODS: Data were obtained in 63 patients with non-operated VS, and 20 patients operated on VS. Vestibular function was assessed by caloric, cervical and ocular VEMP testing. 37/63 patients with conclusive ACS ocular VEMPs responses were studied separately. RESULTS: In the 63 non-operated VS patients, cVEMPs were abnormal in 65.1% of patients in response to AC STB and in 49.2% of patients to AC clicks. In the 37/63 patients with positive responses from the unaffected side, oVEMPs were abnormal in 75.7% of patients with ACS, in 67.6% with AFz and in 56.8% with mastoid BCV stimulation. In 16% of the patients, VEMPs were the only abnormal test (normal caloric and normal hearing). Among the 26 patients who did not show oVEMP responses on either side with ACS, oVEMPs responses could be obtained with AFz (50%) and with mastoid stimulation (89%). CONCLUSIONS: The VEMP test demonstrated significant clinical value as it yielded the only abnormal test results in some patients suffering from a unilateral vestibular schwannoma. For oVEMPs, we suggest that ACS stimulation should be the initial test. In patients who responded to ACS and who had normal responses, BCV was not required. In patients with abnormal responses on the affected side using ACS, BCV at AFz should be used to confirm abnormal function of the superior vestibular nerve. In patients who exhibited no responses on either side to ACS, BCV was the only approach allowing assessment of the function of the superior vestibular nerve. We favor using AFz stimulation first because it is easier to perform in clinical practice than mastoid stimulation.

Ocular and cervical VEMPs: a study of 74 patients suffering from peripheral vestibular disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the results of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) tests for healthy subjects with those for patients suffering from vestibular diseases to try to determine the clinical usefulness of combined ocular and cervical STB VEMP testing. METHODS: Thirty-two healthy volunteers and 74 patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction underwent tests for ocular and cervical VEMPs induced by AC 100 dB nHL 500 Hz STB combined with caloric and audiometric tests. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, the mean P13-N23 peak-to-peak amplitude of cervical VEMPs was much larger than the mean n1-p1 peak-to-peak amplitude of ocular VEMPs. In patients, cervical and ocular VEMPs may be dissociated. The peak-to-peak amplitude of both cervical and ocular tests was abnormally in most of patients suffering from vestibular lesions. No correlations were found between VEMPs, the degree of hearing loss and/or of horizontal canalar paresis. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular and cervical VEMPs provide complementary information about saccular and utricular otolithic function. SIGNIFICANCE: Testing of ocular and cervical VEMPs allows the crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex and ipsilateral sacculo-collic reflex to be determined. These tests can help describe vestibular lesions and assess the effects of treatment and should therefore be used clinically.