Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spine Surg Relat Res ; 1(3): 152-157, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31440627

RESUMO

OBJECT: Low back pain (LBP) attributable to fusion failure, implant failure, infection, malalignment, or adjacent segment disease may persist after lumbar fusion surgery (LFS). Superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment neuropathy (SCNEN) is a clinical entity that can produce LBP. We report that SCNEN treatment improved LBP in patients who had undergone LFS. METHODS: Between April 2012 and August 2015, we treated 8 patients (4 men and 4 women ranging in age from 38 to 88 years; mean age, 69 years) with SCNEN for their LBP after LFS. Our criteria for the diagnosis of SCNEN included a trigger point over the posterior iliac crest 7 cm from the midline and numbness and radiating pain in the SCN area upon compression of the trigger point. Symptom relief was obtained in more than 75% of patients within 2 h of inducing a local nerve block at the trigger point in the buttocks. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 28 months (range, 9-54 months). RESULTS: LBP was unilateral in 3 and bilateral in 5 patients. The senior author (T.I.) operated all patients for SCNEN under local anesthesia because they reported recurrence of pain after the analgesic effect of repeat injections wore off. This led to a significant improvement of their LBP. CONCLUSIONS: SCNEN should be considered in patients reporting LBP after LFS. Treatment of SCNEN may be a useful option in patients with failed back surgery syndrome after LFS.

2.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) ; 54(11): 901-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25367582

RESUMO

Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is an entrapment neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve and its branches in the tarsal tunnel. We present our less invasive surgical treatment of TTS in 69 patients (116 feet) and their clinical outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 64.6 months. With the patient under local anesthesia we use a microscope to perform sharp dissection of the flexor retinaculum and remove the connective tissues surrounding the posterior tibial nerve and vessels. To prevent postoperative adhesion and delayed neuropathy, decompression is performed to achieve symptom improvement without excessive dissection. Decompression is considered complete when the patient reports intraoperative symptom abatement and arterial pulsation is sufficient. The sensation of numbness and/or pain and of foreign substance adhesion was reduced in 92% and 95% of our patients, respectively. In self-assessments, 47 patients (68%) reported the treatment outcome as satisfactory, 15 (22%) as acceptable, and 7 (10%) were dissatisfied. Of 116 feet, 4 (3%) required re-operation, initial decompression was insufficient in 2 feet and further decompression was performed; in the other 2 feet improvement was achieved by decompression of the distal tarsal tunnel. Our surgical method involves neurovascular bundle decompression to obtain sufficient arterial pulsation. As we use local anesthesia, we can confirm symptom improvement intraoperatively, thereby avoiding unnecessary excessive dissection. Our method is simple, safe, and without detailed nerve dissection and it prevents postoperative adhesion.


Assuntos
Dissecação/métodos , Cirurgia de Descompressão Microvascular/métodos , Síndrome do Túnel do Tarso/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Local , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome do Túnel do Tarso/diagnóstico
3.
No Shinkei Geka ; 34(9): 919-24, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16984026

RESUMO

Although motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has been accepted as an effective therapeutic option for central pain, the efficacy of MCS widely varies among previous reports. In this report, we describe our recent trial for successful MCS in 3 patients with central pain due to cerebral stroke. Medical treatments were transiently effective, but gradually became ineffective in all of the cases. During surgery, the appropriate cortical target was determined by using neuronavigation, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), and motor evoked potential (MEP). A flat, four-plate electrode was positioned on the dura mater parallel to the motor cortex. After surgery, pain almost resolved in 2 of 3 patients and markedly improved in another. The pain relief depended on their motor function. These findings strongly suggest that both patient selection and intraoperative monitoring for targeting the motor cortex are quite important for successful MCS, although further studies were essential.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Córtex Motor/fisiopatologia , Neuronavegação , Manejo da Dor , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/cirurgia , Idoso , Potencial Evocado Motor , Potenciais Somatossensoriais Evocados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dor/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA