Withania Somnifera Extract Mitigates Experimental Acute Graft versus Host Disease Without Abrogating Graft Versus Leukemia Effect.

Acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) is the major contributor of nonrelapse mortality in alloHSCT. It is associated with an inflammatory immune response manifesting as cytokine storm with ensuing damage to target organs such as liver, gut, and skin. Prevention of aGvHD while retaining the beneficial graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect remains a major challenge. Withania somnifera extract (WSE) is known for its anti-inflammatory, immune-modulatory, and anticancer properties, which are appealing in the context of aGvHD. Herein, we demonstrated that prophylactic and therapeutic use of WSE in experimental model of alloHSCT mitigates aGvHD-associated morbidity and mortality. In the prophylaxis study, a dose of 75 mg/kg of WSE offered greatest protection against death due to aGvHD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15 [0.03-0.68], P ≤ .01), whereas 250 mg/kg was most effective for the treatment of aGvHD (HR = 0.16 [0.05-0.5], P ≤ .01). WSE treatment protected liver, gut, and skin from damage by inhibiting cytokine storm and lymphocytic infiltration to aGvHD target organs. In addition, WSE did not compromise the GvL effect, as alloHSCT with or without WSE did not allow the leukemic A20 cells to grow. In fact, WSE showed marginal antileukemic effect in vivo. WSE is currently under clinical investigation for the prevention and treatment of aGvHD.

Impact of a pediatric oncology nutrition program: Lessons learnt over a decade.

BACKGROUND: The management of malnutrition in children with cancer remains a challenge in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). We describe our pediatric oncology nutrition program and its impact over the past decade. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of our nutrition program in accordance with the International Society of Paediatric Oncology-Paediatric Oncology in Developing Countries (SIOP PODC) Nutritional Program Evaluation in the areas of service delivery (number served, increments in delivery, number of trained care providers), patients at-risk (proportion identified with malnutrition at diagnosis/follow-up), and efficiency of nutritional interventions (proportion assessed, proportion achieved healthy weight, clinicians trained). We analyzed available data for trends between 2009 and 2020, and comparisons were made using the Fisher t test. This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, 17 749 children treated at our center were beneficiaries of the nutritional program, including assessment and intervention. During this period, trained pediatric nutritionists increased from 2 to 8; SIOP PODC level from 2 to 3-4, and nutrition budget increased 15-fold. At diagnosis (n = 5618) and six-month follow-up (n = 2674), 59.6% and 51.2% children were undernourished, 34.8% and 43% well nourished, and 4.7% and 5.7% overnourished. From 2016 onward, fewer children were undernourished at follow-up-69.5% (2016), 60% (2018), 54% (2019), and 55% (2020, P < 0.001). The program helped train over 500 clinicians in nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: Improved financial support and capacity building have helped build and sustain an effective nutrition program. Priority areas include implementation of best practices, early nutritional intervention, continued education, and locally relevant research.