Impact of biofilm production by Candida species and antifungal therapy on mortality of patients with candidemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with candidemia caused by Candida species with different levels of biofilm formation. We aimed to investigate the impact of antifungal therapy on the outcome of candidemia caused by Candida species that were categorised as low biofilm formers (LBFs), moderate biofilm formers (MBFs), and high biofilm formers (HBFs). METHODS: Adults with candidemia caused by LBF and HBF/MBF Candida species that were susceptible to fluconazole and caspofungin were included to investigate the impact of treatment with fluconazole vs an echinocandin on 30-day crude mortality. RESULTS: In total, 215 patients with candidemia received fluconazole and 116 patients received an echinocandin. In multivariate analysis, Pittsburgh bacteremia score ≥ 4 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-4.41), malignancy (AOR = 3.45; 95% CI, 1.83-6.51), not removing the central venous catheter within 48 hours of a positive blood culture (AOR = 4.69; 95% CI, 2.61-8.45), and treatment with fluconazole for candidemia due to HBF/MBF Candida spp. (AOR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.22-4.06) were independent factors associated with 30-day mortality. Of the 165 patients infected by HBF/MBF Candida isolates, those who received azole therapy had a significantly higher sepsis-related mortality rate than those who received echinocandin therapy (44.9% [49/109] vs 26.8% [15/56], P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend of an independent association between fluconazole treatment and poor outcomes in the patients infected by HBF/MBF Candida strains.

Five-year sequential changes in secondary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan.

AIM: To determine changes in the antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in southern Taiwan after failure of first-line standard triple therapy. METHODS: We analyzed 137 H. pylori-infected isolates from patients who experienced eradication failure after standard first-line triple therapy from January 2010 to December 2014. The H. pylori strains were tested for susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole and tetracycline using the E-test method. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the agar dilution test. MIC values of ≥ 0.5, ≥ 1, ≥ 1, ≥ 4 and ≥ 8 mg/L were considered to be the resistance breakpoints for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, tetracycline and metronidazole, respectively. RESULTS: A high resistance rate was found for clarithromycin (65%-75%) and metronidazole (30%-40%) among patients who failed first-line standard therapy. The resistance levels to amoxicillin and tetracycline remained very low; however, levofloxacin resistance was as high as 37.5% in 2010 but did not increase any further during the past 5 years. The rates of resistance to these antibiotics did not show a statistically significant upward or downward trend. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic resistance of H. pylori remains a problem for the effective eradication of this pathogen and its associated diseases in Taiwan. High clarithromycin resistance indicated that this antibiotic should not be prescribed as a second-line H. pylori eradication therapy. Moreover, levofloxacin-based second-line therapy should be used cautiously, and the local resistance rates should be carefully monitored.

Comparative effectiveness of flomoxef versus carbapenems in the treatment of bacteraemia due to extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae with emphasis on minimum inhibitory concentration of flomoxef: a retrospective study.

This study compared treatment outcomes of adult patients with bacteraemia due to extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-EK) receiving flomoxef versus those receiving a carbapenem as definitive therapy. In propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, case patients receiving flomoxef shown to be active in vitro against ESBL-EK were matched with controls who received a carbapenem. The primary endpoint was 30-day crude mortality. The flomoxef group had statistically significantly higher sepsis-related mortality (27.3% vs. 10.5%) and 30-day mortality (28.8% vs. 12.8%) than the carbapenem group. Of the bacteraemic episodes caused by isolates with a MICflomoxef of ≤1 mg/L, sepsis-related mortality rates were similar between the two treatment groups (8.7% vs. 6.4%; P=0.73). The sepsis-related mortality rate of the flomoxef group increased to 29.6% and 50.0% of episodes caused by isolates with a MICflomoxef of 2-4 mg/L and 8 mg/L, respectively, which was significantly higher than the carbapenem group (12.3%). In the PSM analysis of 86 case-control pairs infected with strains with a MICflomoxef of 2-8 mg/L, case patients had a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate (38.4% vs. 18.6%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that flomoxef therapy for isolates with a MICflomoxef of 2-8 mg/L, concurrent pneumonia or urosepsis, and a Pitt bacteraemia score ≥4 were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Definitive flomoxef therapy appears to be inferior to carbapenems in treating ESBL-EK bacteraemia, particularly for isolates with a MICflomoxef of 2-8 mg/L, even though the currently suggested MIC breakpoint of flomoxef is ≤8 mg/L.

Clinical characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia meningitis in adults: a high incidence in patients with a postneurosurgical state, long hospital staying and antibiotic use.

OBJECTIVE: Stenotrophomonas (S.) maltophilia is an uncommon pathogen of adult bacterial meningitis (ABM). METHODS: The clinical characteristics of six S. maltophilia ABM cases, collected during a study period of nine years (2001-2009) were included. In the related literature, 13 S. maltophilia ABM cases were reported, and their clinical data were also collected. RESULTS: The 19 S. maltophilia ABM cases included 11 men and 8 women, aged 28-70 years. Of these 19 cases, 89.5% (17/19) had underlying neurosurgical (NS) conditions as the preceding event. Before the development of S. maltophilia ABM, 52.6% (10/19) of them had long stays in hospital and 63.2% (12/19) had undergone antibiotic treatment. Among the implicated S. maltophilia cases, three strains were found to have a resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMZ-TMP). Two of our five cases had resistant strains to levofloxacin. Among the antibiotics chosen for treatment, SMZ-TMP was the most common followed by quinolone (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin). The therapeutic results showed 2 cases expired while the other 17 cases survived. CONCLUSIONS: S. maltophilia ABM usually develops in patients with a preceding neurosurgical condition, a long hospital stay and antibiotic use. SMZ-TMP and quinolones, especially the ciprofloxacin, are the major antibiotic used. This study also shows the emergence of clinical S. maltophilia strains which are not susceptible to SMZ-TMP and quinolones and this development may pose a more serious threat in the near future because treatment options may become depleted and limited despite the mortality rate of this specific group of ABM not being high at this time.

Spinal epidural abscess in adults caused by Staphylococcus aureus: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a devastating infectious disease, which may result in neurologic sequelae. Staphylococcus (S.) aureus is a common pathogen of SEA. Here, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and laboratory data of adult patients with S. aureus SEA and compared the clinical characteristics of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, we collected data regarding 29 adult cases of S. aureus SEA and analyzed the clinical presentations, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features, therapeutic outcome, and prognostic factors. Antibiotic susceptibility test results of 11 implicated MRSA strains were also further analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 17 MSSA strains and 12 MRSA strains. Lumbar and lumbosacral spine segments were the most commonly involved segments. All 29 patients had back pain. Other findings included sensory abnormalities (25), motor weakness (21), fever (16), bladder dysfunction (16), and altered consciousness (3). Disease onset at admission was acute in 6 cases and chronic in 23. The stages of disease severity were early stage in 9 and late stage in 20. After therapy, 21 patients had a good prognosis and 8 had a poor prognosis. Significant prognostic factors included older age (>70years), presence of diabetes mellitus, adrenal insufficiency, and MRSA infection. The prognosis alone was clinically different between patients with MSSA and MRSA infections. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with localized back pain, particularly those with a fever and compromised immune system, should undergo MR imaging to ensure an early diagnosis and management.

Antimicrobial effects of varied combinations of meropenem, sulbactam, and colistin on a multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolate that caused meningitis and bacteremia.

Meropenem (MEM; 2 g/8 hr; minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 256 mg/L) plus sulbactam (SUL; 1 g/8 hr; MIC = 128 mg/L) (two-drug-therapy period), and subsequent additional intravenous colistin (COL; 2.5 mg/kg/12 hr) and intraventricular (COL, 5 mg/day; MIC = 1 mg/L) (three-drug-therapy period) were sequentially used in a patient with postneurosurgery bacteremic meningitis due to a multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB) isolate (AB(1)). We detected 4- to 32-fold increases in peak or trough cerebrospinal fluid bactericidal titer and serum bactericidal titer in three-drug-therapy period when comparing to those in two-drug-therapy period. The time-kill study with MEM, SUL, and COL alone or varied combinations (all at 1 x MIC) against AB(1) and another genetically nonrelated MDRAB isolate (AB(134) [MICs of MEM = 64 mg/L, SUL = 16 mg/L, and COL = 1 mg/L]) was performed. The two-drug combinations (MEM + SUL, MEM + COL, and SUL + COL) each elicited different inhibitory effect on AB(1) and AB(134) at 6 hr. Bacterial regrowth at 24 hr was observed in the experiments in which the MDRAB isolate was inhibited earlier by COL alone (AB(1) and AB(134)), by MEM plus SUL (AB(1)), and by MEM plus COL (AB(134)), but not in SUL plus COL, and MEM + SUL + COL. Combined use of COL with MEM and/or SUL may provide good therapeutic options, even though MEM and SUL are in vitro resistance to the MDRAB.