Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Dermatol ; 159(2): 219-222, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542397

RESUMO

This case series describes the outcome of high-dose vitamin D treatment in 6 inpatients with acute skin injury.


Assuntos
Eritema , Vitamina D , Humanos , Eritema/induzido quimicamente , Eritema/tratamento farmacológico , Vitaminas , Raios Ultravioleta
2.
Front Oncol ; 8: 405, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30319970

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) are increasingly used to treat several malignancies, with the most common adverse event being cutaneous toxicity. We report the case of a 68-years-old man with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab who developed a pruritic, lichenoid eruption refractory to treatment with topical or systemic steroids, who was started on narrow band ultraviolet B therapy which resolved the reaction.

3.
Obes Surg ; 28(2): 369-377, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28779269

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evidence behind recommendations for treatment of iron deficiency (ID) following roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) lacks high quality studies. SETTING: Academic, United States OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of oral iron supplementation using non-heme versus heme iron for treatment of iron deficiency in RYGB patients. METHODS: In a randomized, single-blind study, women post-RYGB and iron deficient received non-heme iron (FeSO4, 195 mg/day) or heme iron (heme-iron-polypeptide, HIP, 31.5 to 94.5 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Measures of iron status, including blood concentrations of ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), and hemoglobin, were assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean ± standard deviation for age, BMI, and years since surgery of the sample was 41.5 ± 6.8 years, 34.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2, and 6.9 ± 3.1 years, respectively; and there were no differences between FeSO4 (N = 6) or HIP (N = 8) groups. Compliance was greater than 94%. The study was stopped early due to statistical and clinical differences between groups. Values before and after FeSO4 supplementation, expressed as least square means (95% CI) were hemoglobin, 10.8 (9.8, 11.9) to 13.0 (11.9, 14.0) g/dL; sTfR, 2111 (1556, 2864) to 1270 (934, 1737) µg/L; ferritin, 4.9 (3.4, 7.2) to 15.5 (10.6, 22.6) µg/L; and sTfR:ferritin ratio, 542 (273, 1086) to 103 (51, 204); all p < 0.0001. With HIP supplementation, no change was observed in any of the iron status biomarkers (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with recommendations, oral supplementation using FeSO4, but not HIP, was efficacious for treatment of iron deficiency after RYGB.


Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Ferro/administração & dosagem , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Anemia Ferropriva/sangue , Anemia Ferropriva/etiologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Formas de Dosagem , Feminino , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Deficiências de Ferro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA