Safety of Supplementation of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

There is no comprehensive review of the evidence to support omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) as a relatively safe and tolerable intervention. This study aimed to provide a meta-analytic and comprehensive review on the adverse effects of all kinds of ω-3 PUFA supplementation reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in human subjects. A systematic review of RCTs published between 1987 and 2023 was carried out based on searches of 8 electronic databases. All RCTs that compared the adverse effects of ω-3 PUFAs containing eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, or both compared with controls (a placebo or a standard treatment) were included. The primary outcome was the adverse effects related to ω-3 PUFA prescription. A total of 90 RCTs showed that the ω-3 PUFA group, when compared with the placebo, had significantly higher odds of occurrence of diarrhea (odds ratio [OR] = 1.257, P = 0.010), dysgeusia (OR = 3.478, P < 0.001), and bleeding tendency (OR = 1.260, P = 0.025) but lower rates of back pain (OR = 0.727, P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed that the prescription ω-3 PUFA products (RxOME3FAs) had higher ω-3 PUFA dosages than generic ω-3 PUFAs (OME3FAs) (3056.38 ± 1113.28 mg/d compared with 2315.92 ± 1725.61 mg/d), and studies on RxOME3FAs performed more standard assessments than OME3FAs on adverse effects (63% compared with 36%). There was no report of definite ω-3 PUFA-related serious adverse events. The subjects taking ω-3 PUFAs were at higher odds of experiencing adverse effects; hence, comprehensive assessments of the adverse effects may help to detect minor/subtle adverse effects associated with ω-3 PUFAs. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42023401169.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for patients with anxiety symptoms. Method: We searched the Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and Medline for randomized control trials (RCTs) from the time of inception until November 15, 2021, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were the mean change scores for anxiety symptoms. The secondary outcomes were the mean change scores for depressive symptoms. Results: Eleven RCTs were eligible (n = 794, mean age: 41.4, mean population of female: 64.8%). CES significantly reduced the anxiety symptoms compared to the control group [k = 11, n = 692, Hedge's g = -0.625, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = -0.952 to -0.298, P < 0.001] with moderate effect size. The subgroup analysis showed that CES reduced both primary and secondary anxiety (primary anxiety, k =3, n = 288, Hedges' g = -1.218, 95% CIs = -1.418 to -0.968, P = 0.007; secondary anxiety, k = 8, n = 504, Hedges' g = -0.334, 95% CIs = -0.570 to -0.098, P = 0.006). After performing between group analysis, we found CES has significant better efficacy for patients with primary anxiety than those with secondary anxiety (P < 0.001). For secondary outcome, CES significantly reduced depressive symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders (k = 8, n = 552, Hedges' g = -0.648, 95% CIs = -1.062 to -0.234, P = 0.002). No severe side effects were reported and the most commonly reported adverse events were ear discomfort and ear pain. Conclusion: We found CES is effective in reducing anxiety symptoms with moderate effect size in patients with both primary and secondary anxiety. Furthermore, CES was well-tolerated and acceptable.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021267916.

Increased prevalence and risk of anxiety disorders in adults with tinnitus: A population-based study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus is a common disorder that may cause psychological distress and anxiety. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between anxiety disorders (ADs) and tinnitus in a large population. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Study subjects included 14,772 patients with tinnitus and 709,963 people in the general population who sought treatment in 2005. Distributions in ADs, age, sex, and medical comorbidities were compared between groups using chi-squared tests. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and medical comorbidities were used to analyze the association between tinnitus and ADs. RESULTS: Prevalence of ADs in tinnitus and general population groups was 3.9% and 1.5%, respectively, and this difference was significant (P<0.001). Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, concussion or head injury, Meniere's disease, sensorineural hearing impairment, renal disease, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease were significantly more prevalent in the tinnitus group (all P-values<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated that patients with tinnitus were significantly associated with increased risk of ADs (adjusted OR=1.99; 95% CI=1.81-2.19; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Because the risk of ADs was significantly higher in patients with tinnitus than in the general population, physicians should be aware of the importance of psychological factors in tinnitus management.