Clinical Factors Affecting Bevacizumab Efficacy With and Without Conventional Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab (BZ) combined with first line chemotherapy (CC) has shown good clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Overall survival (OS) and/or progression free survival in mCRC patients receiving BZ with or without 5FU-based CC is thought to be affected by clinical and morphological factor(s). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed retrospective medical records of all consecutive mCRC patients treated with BZ with or without CC at tertiary care center between 2003 and 2009 out of which149 patients (m = 77, f = 72) were eligible. RESULTS: Our study population had a mean age at diagnosis of 63.5 years (SD = 11) with median follow-up period of 19.4 months. On initial radiological evaluation following BZ therapy, 56 patients (m = 31, f = 25) had complete or partial response categorized as "early responders." Remaining patients (m = 46, f = 47) who were either stable or showed progressive disease were categorized as "non-responders." Fifty percent among early responders and 60% among non-responders [relative risk (RR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-1.06)] demonstrated disease progression on follow up. There was a slightly better OS among early responders compared to non-responders (median 21.5 months days versus 16.8 months, P = 0.07). Cox regression analysis suggested male sex (RR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43-0.98), hematochezia (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.4-0.98), resectable primary tumor (RR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.24-0.72) and resectable metastatic mass (RR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.14-0.74) were found to be associated with longer OS. Abdominal pain (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.1-2.8), accompanying diabetes (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.09-2.85), and unexplained weight loss (RR 2.73, 95% CI, 1.73-4.29) were associated with poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: Better OS among mCRC patients with resectable primary and metastatic tumors was seen. This is the first study to demonstrate slightly better outcome in males and negative influence of diabetes on outcome in mCRC treated with BZ.

Medical Providers' Oral Health Knowledgeability, Attitudes, and Practice Behaviors: An Opportunity for Interprofessional Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of current knowledgeability, attitudes, and practice behaviors of medical providers from a large health care system toward oral health was undertaken as a pilot effort to better understand and integrate oral health into the overall health care delivery. METHODS: Invitations to complete a 28-question survey, designed in a web-based platform (SurveyMonkey(®)), were emailed to 1407 medical multispecialty physicians, residents, and nurses within the health system. The questionnaire included sections on provider demographics, oral health knowledgeability and attitudes, and current practice conducting oral health screenings. RESULTS: A 14% (n = 199/1407) response rate was achieved for survey completion. There were 16% who reported good coverage of oral/dental health topics in their medical training curriculum. Competency level was <30% for identifying tooth decay and oral pathology. There were 95% who reported never applying fluoride varnish in their practice, while >80% answered knowledge-based questions correctly. Frequency rates for dental referral by the medical providers were 32% 'frequently' and 68% 'infrequently.' Perceptions of optimal frequency for conducting oral health assessment in their professional practices ranged from 69% indicating 'frequently' to 25% indicating 'infrequently.' CONCLUSION: Overall, positive attitudes were observed toward incorporation of oral health examination into medical practice. The study identified lack of oral health treatment and infrequent referral by medical providers to dental providers. Results support likelihood for acceptance of care models that incorporate a medical/dental team-based approach complemented by oral health training for medical providers to enhance holistic health care delivery. Limitations of this pilot study include potential selection bias and lack of generalizability beyond our institution; further studies are planned in additional settings statewide to validate findings.

Medical providers' dental information needs: a baseline survey.

Articulation of medical and dental practices has been strongly called for based on the many oral-systemic connections. With the rapid development and adoption of electronic health records, the feasibility of integrating medical and dental patient data should be strongly considered. The objective of this study was to develop an initial understanding of the medical providers' core dental information needs and opinion of integrated medical-dental electronic health record (iEHR) environment in their workflow. This was achieved by administering a 13 question survey to a group of 1,197 medical care providers employed by Marshfield Clinic in Wisconsin, United States. The survey received a response rate of 35%. The responses were analyzed based on provider 'Role' and 'Specialty'. The majority of the respondents felt the need for patient's dental information to coordinate or provide effective medical care. An integrated electronic health record environment could facilitate this holistic patient care approach.