A clinical and nutritional comparison of biliopancreatic diversion performed with different common and alimentary channel lengths.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compares the clinical and nutritional outcomes of 100 morbidly obese patients who underwent biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) with common (CC) and alimentary channel (AC) length, respectively, 50/250 and 80/200 cm. METHODS: One hundred patients who received BPD from October 2006 to November 2011 were identified from a database of bariatric procedures performed at the University Hospital of Messina, and the outcomes in terms of weight loss and morbidity were compared. Forty morbidly obese patients underwent BPD with CC 80 cm and AC 200 cm (group 1) and 60 morbidly obese patients underwent BPD with CC 50 cm and AC 250 cm (group 2). RESULTS: A gradual weight loss was observed in both groups during the first 3 years after the operation without any significant difference between the two groups. Two cases of protein malnutrition occurred in the group 2 (3 %) due to poor patient compliance in terms of adequate dietary protein intake. Sideropenic anemia was found in 42 % of obese patients in group 2 versus 22.5 % in group 1 at third-year follow-up despite adequate supplementation (p = 0.047). Diarrhea occurred more frequently with a shorter CC. Lipophilic vitamin deficiencies occurred more frequently with a shorter CC despite adequate oral supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: In the medium term, our series showed that shorter CC was associated with no weight loss advantage but with higher morbidity rate, especially in young and fertile women. We recommend a longer CC (80 cm) to be performed especially in this sub-population of obese patients.

Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography plus MIBI scintigraphy in selecting patients with primary hyperparathyroidism for unilateral neck exploration under local anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral neck exploration (UNE) is currently replacing conventional bilateral neck exploration with cervicotomy for the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). However, many concerns still exist about the indications and the effectiveness of this minimally invasive approach. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of operative results in consecutive patients having indications for UNE on the basis of strict selection criteria consisting of ultrasound-MIBI agreement in adenoma localization, absence of thyroid disease, and psychological suitability for undergoing a procedure under local anesthesia. No intraoperative confirmation study was adopted. RESULTS: Among 149 consecutive PHPT patients, 45 (30.2%) had indications for UNE. No operative morbidity or mortality was observed. Mean operative time for the UNE procedure was 42 minutes (range 25 to 57). Conversion to general anesthesia was chosen for 5 patients (11.1%), whereas conversion to bilateral neck exploration was chosen for 3 patients (6.6%). For the UNE procedure, the success rate was as high as 91.7%. When the only factor indicated UNE, ultrasound-MIBI localization agreement had low sensibility (44.1%) and specificity (55.6%) but a high positive predictive value (91.1%). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that UNE performed under local anesthesia, without intraoperative confirmation studies, could be considered a safe and effective approach to treating patients with PHPT, but we regret the low rate of patients selected for this procedure because of the low sensitivity of the imaging-inclusion criterion.