Vitamin D screening.

At present, there is no need and no sufficient evidence to support universal screening for vitamin D status. There are four categories of subjects in whom there is no requirement for screening, since a number of studies indicate beneficial effects of vitamin D supplementation; these are represented by children and adolescents, pregnant women, patients taking bone active drugs and subjects with documented hypovitaminosis D. In the remaining subjects, the utilization of adequate questionnaires will target with sufficient sensitivity and specificity those with hypovitaminosis D. These must be first supplemented and, at a later time, serum 25(OH)D assay should be requested to confirm attainment of sufficiency, independently of the threshold chosen. This strategy will cut costs deriving from both widespread use of vitamin D assays and vitamin D supplementation.

Long-term bone mineral density changes after surgical cure of patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia.

This paper reports our personal experience filling the gap regarding changes of bone mineral density after surgical treatment in patient suffering from tumor-induced osteomalacia. INTRODUCTION: No systematic data are available regarding long-term bone mineral density (BMD) changes after surgical cure of patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia. METHODS: From October 2001 through April 2018, we studied 10 consecutive patients (mean age ± SD, 45.5 ± 13.8 years; 5 males and 5 females) with tumor-induced osteomalacia. We evaluated BMD when initially presented at our Center and after surgical removal of the tumor. RESULTS: Basal BMD and corresponding Z-score values (mean values ± SD) measured by DXA were as follows: L1-L4 = 0.692 ± 0.15 g/cm2, Z-score = - 2.80 ± 1.60; femur neck 0.447 ± 0.10 g/cm2, Z-score = - 2.66 ± 0.93; total femur = 0.450 ± 0.08 g/cm2, Z-score = -3.04 ± 0.85). Furthermore, Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) was evaluated in three patients (basal values, 0.990 ± 0.32). Seven patients were intermittently followed after surgical excision of the tumor while supplemented with cholecalciferol and calcium salts; the remaining three were lost to follow-up. There was a striking increase of BMD values that peaked at 26.7 ± 6.50 months: L1-L4 = 1.289 ± 0.247 g/cm2, p < 0.001, Z-score + 1.75 ± 1.42; femur neck = 0.890 ± 0.235 g/cm2, p = 0.028, Z-score = + 0.50 ± 1.40; total femur = 0.834 ± 0.150 g/cm2, p = 0.005, Z-score = - 0.74 ± 1.14. In patients with the greatest bone involvement at lumbar site, there was a striking increase of an average 1.5% (p < 0.01) in respect to baseline Z-score value for each additional month of observation during the first 2-3 years post-surgery. An improvement of trabecular microarchitecture was also documented (TBS, 1.255 ± 0.16). CONCLUSION: This is the first case series documenting an impressive increase of BMD at both lumbar and femoral sites, together with an improvement of trabecular microarchitecture as documented by TBS. This is the consequence of huge mineralization of the large amount of osteoid tissue after resolution of the disease.

Effect of a single oral dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol on muscle strength: a study in young women.

BACKGROUND: The effect of a single large oral dose of vitamin D on muscle function in young people with vitamin D deficiency has not been investigated so far. AIM: We evaluated the effect of a single oral dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol on muscle strength. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen young women with vitamin D deficiency received a single oral dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol. We evaluated changes in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and speed of contraction (S) in response to cholecalciferol by using an hand held dynamometer at 3, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days, compared to baseline. RESULTS: We observed no significant change in MVC and S values, a significant increase of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] and a significant decrease in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) (p<0.001 for all). A significant correlation was found between MVC and S and serum phosphorus (P) after supplementation (p<0.02 and p<0.05, respectively). Conversely, we observed no association between the parameters of muscle strength and 25(OH)D, ionized calcium (Ca2+), PTH and 1,25(OH)2D. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol does not directly enhance handgrip strength in young women with vitamin D deficiency. More studies are needed on the indirect effect of the hormone on muscle.

Potassium intake and risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Serum potassium has been found to be a significant predictor of diabetes risk, but the effect of dietary potassium on diabetes risk is not clear. We sought to determine if dietary potassium is associated with risk of incident type 2 diabetes in young adults. METHODS: We used data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Potassium intake was measured by (1) an average of three 24 h urinary potassium collections at the 5-year study visit, and (2) the CARDIA dietary assessment instrument at baseline. Incident type 2 diabetes cases were ascertained on the basis of use of diabetes medication and laboratory measurements. Analyses were adjusted for relevant confounders including intake of fruit and vegetables and other dietary factors. RESULTS: Of 1,066 participants with urinary potassium measurements, 99 (9.3%) developed diabetes over 15 years of follow-up. In multivariate models, adults in the lowest urinary potassium quintile were more than twice as likely to develop diabetes as their counterparts in the highest quintile (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.08, 5.59). Of 4,754 participants with dietary history measurements, 373 (7.8%) developed diabetes over 20 years of follow-up. In multivariate models, African-Americans had a significantly increased risk of diabetes with lower potassium intake, which was not found in whites. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Low dietary potassium is associated with increased risk of incident diabetes in African-Americans. Randomised clinical trials are needed to determine if potassium supplementation, from either dietary or pharmacological sources, could reduce the risk of diabetes, particularly in higher-risk populations.

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials in colon cancer.

During the last decade, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) has completed six adjuvant chemotherapy trials comparing different adjuvant therapy regimens or adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone. A seventh trial is ongoing. These trials have contributed to defining the role of adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. Patients eligible for inclusion in NSABP trials had been diagnosed as having stage II or III colon cancer with no evidence of gross residual or metastatic disease. The follow-up strategies were similar in the reported trials with follow-up every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 3 to 5 years, and annually thereafter. The NSABP C-01 protocol was a three-arm trial comparing an adjuvant semustine/vincristine/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen (MOF) to a Bacille Calmette-Guerin treatment, and to surgery alone. The C-02 protocol investigated whether portal vein infusion of 5-FU improved survival outcome compared with surgery alone. Protocol C-03 compared a semustine/vincristine/5-FU regimen to a 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV) (5-FU/LV) regimen. The NSABP C-04 protocol was a three-arm trial comparing 5-FU/LV, 5-FU plus levamisole, and 5-FU/LV plus levamisole. The NSABP C-05 trial compared 5-FU/LV to 5-FU/LV plus alpha-interferon. Results of NSABP C-01, C-02, C-03, C-04, and C-05 trials are summarized in this report. Patient accrual has completed in the NSABP C-06 trial comparing 5-FU/LV with oral tegafur and plus uracil leucovorin. The NSABP is currently conducting another trial (C-07) comparing 5-FU/LV with 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer is also discussed in this report. A recent pooled analysis of studies C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04 has indicated that the relative treatment benefit in stage II disease is at least equal to the benefit in stage III colon cancers, and concluded that adjuvant chemotherapy also should be considered as the standard of care for stage II colon cancer patients.

UFT/leucovorin vs 5-FU/leucovorin in colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to alter the natural history of resected colon cancer. Two regimens (fluorouracil [5-FU] plus leucovorin and 5-FU plus levamisole) have been found to prolong disease-free survival and overall survival in affected patients. Previous comparisons of these two regimens indicate that 5-FU plus leucovorin may offer a small disease-free survival and overall survival advantage. Evidence that UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral leucovorin is associated with significant antitumor activity and has an acceptable toxicity profile makes this a logical formulation for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06 is a randomized comparison of the relative efficacies of 5-FU plus leucovorin vs UFT plus leucovorin. Preliminary analysis of the toxicity findings among 1,530 evaluable patients indicates that both regimens are well tolerated and have similar toxicity profiles.

Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02.

BACKGROUND: The conviction that postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy represent an acceptable standard of care for patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the rectum evolved in the absence of data from clinical trials designed to determine whether the addition of radiotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival. This study was carried out to address this issue. An additional aim was to determine whether leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is superior to the combination of 5-FU, semustine, and vincristine (MOF) in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 694) with Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the rectum were enrolled in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol R-02 from September 1987 through December 1992 and were followed. They were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 348) or chemotherapy with postoperative radiotherapy (n = 346). All female patients (n = 287) received 5-FU plus LV chemotherapy; male patients received either MOF (n = 207) or 5-FU plus LV (n = 200). Primary analyses were carried out by use of a stratified log-rank statistic; P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The average time on study for surviving patients is 93 months as of September 30, 1998. Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in no beneficial effect on disease-free survival (P =.90) or overall survival (P =.89), regardless of which chemotherapy was utilized, although it reduced the cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse from 13% to 8% at 5-year follow-up (P =.02). Male patients who received 5-FU plus LV demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival at 5 years compared with those who received MOF (55% versus 47%; P =.009) but not in 5-year overall survival (65% versus 62%; P =.17). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of postoperative radiation therapy to chemotherapy in Dukes' B and C rectal cancer did not alter the subsequent incidence of distant disease, although there was a reduction in locoregional relapse when compared with chemotherapy alone.

UFT plus calcium folinate vs 5-FU plus calcium folinate in colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to alter the natural history of resected colon cancer. Two regimens (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] plus calcium folinate and 5-FU plus levamisole [Ergamisol]) have been found to prolong disease-free survival and overall survival in affected patients. Previous comparisons of these two regimens indicate that 5-FU plus calcium folinate may offer a small disease-free survival and overall survival advantage. The demonstration that UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) offers significant antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile makes this a logical formulation for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06 is a randomized comparison of the relative efficacies of 5-FU/calcium folinate vs UFT plus oral calcium folinate. Preliminary analysis of toxicity findings among 473 evaluable patients indicates that both regimens are well tolerated and have similar toxicity profiles. If, in the final survival analysis, UFT plus oral calcium folinate treatment yields the same or better disease-free survival and/or overall survival as the 5-FU/calcium folinate treatment and the toxicity profiles remain similar, it is likely that UFT plus oral calcium folinate will be accepted as a new standard for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without interferon alfa-2a in colon carcinoma: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-05.

BACKGROUND: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol C-03 showed a benefit from leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant therapy (5-FU + LV) in patients with Dukes' stage B or C carcinoma of the colon. Preclinical and clinical phase I/II data suggested that interferon alfa-2a (IFN) enhanced the efficacy of 5-FU therapy. Accordingly, in NSABP protocol C-05, the addition of recombinant IFN to 5-FU + LV adjuvant therapy was evaluated. METHODS: Data are presented for 2176 patients with Dukes' stage B or C cancer entered onto protocol C-05 during the period from October 1991 through February 1994. Individuals with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (ranges from fully active to ambulatory and capable of self-care but unable to work), a life expectancy of at least 10 years, and curative resection were stratified by sex, disease stage, and number of involved lymph nodes and were randomly assigned to receive either 5-FU + LV or 5-FU + LV + IFN; the mean time on the study as of June 30, 1997, was 54 months. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in either disease-free survival (5-FU + LV, 69%; 5-FU + LV + IFN, 70%) or overall survival (5-FU + LV, 80%; 5-FU + LV + IFN, 81%) at 4 years of follow-up. Toxic effects of grade 3 or higher were observed in 61.8% of subjects in the group treated with 5-FU + LV and in 72.1% of subjects in the group treated with 5-FU + LV + IFN; fewer patients in the latter group completed protocol-mandated 5-FU + LV therapy than in the former group (77.1% versus 88.5%). CONCLUSION: The addition of IFN to 5-FU + LV adjuvant therapy confers no statistically significant benefit, but it does increase toxicity.