Efficacy of bio- and neurofeedback for depression: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: For many years, biofeedback and neurofeedback have been implemented in the treatment of depression. However, the effectiveness of these techniques on depressive symptomatology is still controversial. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies extracted from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. METHODS: Two different strings were considered for each of the two objectives of the study: A first group comprising studies patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a second group including studies targeting depressive symptomatology reduction in other mental or medical conditions. RESULTS: In the first group of studies including patients with MDD, the within-group analyses yielded an effect size of Hedges' g = 0.717, while the between-group analysis an effect size of Hedges' g = 1.050. Moderator analyses indicate that treatment efficacy is only significant when accounting for experimental design, in favor of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in comparison to non RCTs, whereas the type of neurofeedback, trial design, year of publication, number of sessions, age, sex and quality of study did not influence treatment efficacy. In the second group of studies, a small but significant effect between groups was found (Hedges' g = 0.303) in favor of bio- and neurofeedback against control groups. Moderator analyses revealed that treatment efficacy was not moderated by any of the sociodemographic and clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback and neurofeedback are associated with a reduction in self-reported depression. Despite the fact that the field has still a large room for improvement in terms of research quality, the results presented in this study suggests that both modalities may become relevant complementary strategies for the treatment of MDD and depressive symptomatology in the coming years.

Cyclosporine and herbal supplement interactions.

Cyclosporine (CyA) is a well-known immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window. Its bioavailability is affected by many other traditional drugs and herbal extracts. Cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 and protein P-glycoprotein (P-gp) are involved in CyA bioavailability. Interactions of CyA with herbal extracts are not well known, but, given their increased concomitant use, it is important to know which extracts, many of which are commonly self-prescribed, can affect CyA blood concentrations. Decreased CyA blood concentration has been shown with St John's wort in case reports and, in vivo animal studies, with ginger, liquorice, scutellariae radix, and quercetin. Increased CyA concentration has been reported in patients with grapefruit juice, chamomile, or berberine, and with cannabidiol or resveratrol in animal studies. Effects of Echinacea and Serenoa repens on CyA levels have not been shown consistently, but concomitant use should be avoided. Although findings from animal studies cannot be directly translated into humans, avoiding concomitant use of herbal extracts is prudent until human clinical studies have ruled out any possible interaction. Clinicians should interview their patients carefully about their use of herbal supplements before CyA administration, and those receiving CyA should be warned about possible interactions between herbal preparations and CyA.

L-arginine supplementation in young renal allograft recipients with chronic transplant dysfunction.

AIMS: L-arginine (LA), the precursor of nitric oxide (NO), was suggested to be beneficial in many forms of renal disease: hypertension, ureteral obstructive nephropathy and cyclosporin A (CsA) nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Thus, we investigated the effects of LA supplementation on renal function, proteinuria and blood pressure (BP) in young renal allograft recipients with chronic renal transplant dysfunction treated with CsA. Eleven CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with chronic transplant dysfunction, aged 11-22 years, were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment period with placebo (P), followed by 2 subsequent 6-week periods with LA supplementation (0.1 g/kg body weight/day) or a 6-week treatment period with LA, followed by 2 subsequent 6-week periods with P. At the end of each treatment period 24-hour BP recordings were made, and GFR (Inutest), RPF (PAH clearance) and the urinary excretion of protein, albumin, nitrate, cGMP and urea were evaluated. RESULTS: In comparison to placebo, LA treatment did not significantly change GFR, RPF, proteinuria and albuminuria, mean systolic or diastolic BP. The urinary excretion of urea and NO3 increased after LA supplementation (uUrea: LA 26.3 +/- 4.6 compared to P 23.5 +/- 4.7 g/day/1.73 m3, p < 0.05, uNO3: LA 514 +/- 152 compared to P 95 +/- 41 mM/day/1.73 m3, p < 0.05), whereas urinary excretion of cGMP remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: LA supplementation did not improve renal function and did not decrease proteinuria in CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with chronic transplant dysfunction possibly because of inhibition of NO-cGMP forming mechanism.

Comparison of hexadecylphosphocholine with fish oil as an antitumor agent.

Hexadecylphosphocholine (HePC) reduced the growth of the human mammary tumor, MX-1, in the athymic nude mouse similar to the fish oil, MaxEPA. When used together, HePC and MaxEPA were additive towards reducing tumor growth. An unsaturated alkylphosphocholine mixture, ShisoPC, was not as effective as HePC in reducing tumor growth. MaxEPA reduced tumor PGE2 levels greater than 90%, while HePC and the ShisoPC only reduced tumor PGE2 40-60% with HePC being slightly better than ShisoPC. MaxEPA markedly increased the cellular omega 3 fatty acids and decreased 20:4 omega 6, the substrate for PGE2. HePC did not alter the tumor fatty acid composition, but it significantly lowered the total fatty acid concentration of the tumor by about 47%. In addition, phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin decreased in tumors from animals treated with HePC, and alterations in other phospholipids also were noted. These data suggest that different mechanisms exist for HePC and fish oil in reducing tumor growth.