RESUMO
Oil palm fruit is widely used for edible oils, but the health benefits of other components are relatively unknown. We examined if consuming a polyphenol-rich extract of the fruit, from a vegetation by-product of oil processing, which also contains fibre, has gastro-intestinal benefits in rats on a Western-type diet (WD). The oil palm preparation (OPP) was added to food (OPP-F) or drinking water (OPP-D) to provide 50 mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/d and compared to effects of high amylose maize starch (HAMS; 30%) in the diet or green tea extract (GT; 50 mg GAE/d) in drinking water over 4 wk. OPP treatments induced some significant effects (P < 0.05) compared to WD. OPP-D increased caecal digesta mass, caecal digesta concentrations of total SCFA, acetate and propionate (OPP-F increased caecal butyrate concentration), the numbers of mucus-producing goblet cells per colonic crypt, and caecal digesta abundance of some bacteria which may provide benefit to the host (Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila and Ruminococcus gnavus). HAMS induced similar effects but with greater potency and had a broader impact on microbe populations, whereas GT had minimal impacts. These results suggest dietary OPP may benefit the large bowel.
Assuntos
Comportamento Alimentar , Frutas/química , Intestino Grosso/fisiologia , Óleo de Palmeira/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Amônia/análise , Animais , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Ceco/efeitos dos fármacos , Contagem de Células , Cresóis/análise , Dieta , Ácidos Graxos/metabolismo , Fermentação/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Caliciformes/citologia , Células Caliciformes/efeitos dos fármacos , Intestino Grosso/efeitos dos fármacos , Intestino Grosso/microbiologia , Masculino , Tamanho do Órgão/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenóis/análise , Ratos Sprague-DawleyRESUMO
Importance: High-intensity, aerobically prepared fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has demonstrated efficacy in treating active ulcerative colitis (UC). FMT protocols involving anaerobic stool processing methods may enhance microbial viability and allow efficacy with a lower treatment intensity. Objective: To assess the efficacy of a short duration of FMT therapy to induce remission in UC using anaerobically prepared stool. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 73 adults with mild to moderately active UC were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in 3 Australian tertiary referral centers between June 2013 and June 2016, with 12-month follow-up until June 2017. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either anaerobically prepared pooled donor FMT (n = 38) or autologous FMT (n = 35) via colonoscopy followed by 2 enemas over 7 days. Open-label therapy was offered to autologous FMT participants at 8 weeks and they were followed up for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was steroid-free remission of UC, defined as a total Mayo score of ≤2 with an endoscopic Mayo score of 1 or less at week 8. Total Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 (0 = no disease and 12 = most severe disease). Steroid-free remission of UC was reassessed at 12 months. Secondary clinical outcomes included adverse events. Results: Among 73 patients who were randomized (mean age, 39 years; women, 33 [45%]), 69 (95%) completed the trial. The primary outcome was achieved in 12 of the 38 participants (32%) receiving pooled donor FMT compared with 3 of the 35 (9%) receiving autologous FMT (difference, 23% [95% CI, 4%-42%]; odds ratio, 5.0 [95% CI, 1.2-20.1]; P = .03). Five of the 12 participants (42%) who achieved the primary end point at week 8 following donor FMT maintained remission at 12 months. There were 3 serious adverse events in the donor FMT group and 2 in the autologous FMT group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study of adults with mild to moderate UC, 1-week treatment with anaerobically prepared donor FMT compared with autologous FMT resulted in a higher likelihood of remission at 8 weeks. Further research is needed to assess longer-term maintenance of remission and safety. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12613000236796.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Adulto , Anaerobiose , Colonoscopia , Método Duplo-Cego , Enema , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Feminino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Metaboloma , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante Homólogo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Butyrate delivery to the large bowel may positively modulate commensal microbiota and enhance immunity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of increasing large bowel butyrate concentration through ingestion of butyrylated high amylose maize starch (HAMSB) on faecal biochemistry and microbiota, and markers of immunity in healthy active individuals. DESIGN: Male and female volunteers were assigned randomly to consume either two doses of 20 g HAMSB (n = 23; age 37.9 +/- 7.8 y; mean +/- SD) or a low amylose maize starch (LAMS) (n = 18; age 36.9 = 9.5 y) twice daily for 28 days. Samples were collected on days 0, 10 and 28 for assessment of faecal bacterial groups, faecal biochemistry, serum cytokines and salivary antimicrobial proteins. RESULTS: HAMSB led to relative increases in faecal free (45%; 12-86%; mean; 90% confidence interval; P = 0.02), bound (950%; 563-1564%; P < 0.01) and total butyrate (260%; 174-373%; P < 0.01) and faecal propionate (41%; 12-77%; P = 0.02) from day 0 to day 28 compared to LAMS. HAMSB was also associated with a relative 1.6-fold (1.2- to 2.0-fold; P < 0.01) and 2.5-fold (1.4- to 4.4-fold; P = 0.01) increase in plasma IL-10 and TNF-alpha but did not alter other indices of immunity. There were relative greater increases in faecal P. distasonis (81-fold (28- to 237-fold; P < 0.01) and F. prausnitzii (5.1-fold (2.1- to 12-fold; P < 0.01) in the HAMSB group. CONCLUSIONS: HAMSB supplementation in healthy active individuals promotes the growth of bacteria that may improve bowel health and has only limited effects on plasma cytokines.
Assuntos
Butiratos/farmacologia , Colo/efeitos dos fármacos , Colo/microbiologia , Citocinas/biossíntese , Amido/farmacologia , Adulto , Butiratos/imunologia , Colo/imunologia , Fibras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Fezes/química , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Saliva/química , Saliva/imunologia , Amido/imunologiaRESUMO
Synbiotic supplements, which contain multiple functional ingredients, may enhance the immune system more than the use of individual ingredients alone. A double blind active controlled parallel trial over a 21 d exercise training period was conducted to evaluate the effect of Gut Balance™, which contains Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei (L. casei 431®), Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis (BB-12®), Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5®), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LGG®), two prebiotics (raftiline and raftilose) and bovine whey derived lactoferrin and immunoglobulins with acacia gum on fecal microbiota, short chain fatty acids (SCFA), gut permeability, salivary lactoferrin and serum cytokines. All subjects randomized were included in the analysis. There was a 9-fold (1.2-fold to 64-fold; 95% confidence intervals p = 0.03) greater increase in fecal L. paracasei numbers with Gut Balance™ compared with acacia gum supplementation. Gut Balance™ was associated with a 50% (-12% to 72%; p = 0.02) smaller increase in the concentration of serum IL-16 in comparison to acacia gum from pre- to post-study. No substantial effects of either supplement were evident in fecal SCFA concentrations, measures of mucosal immunity or GI permeability. Clinical studies are now required to determine whether Gut Balance™ may exert beneficial GI health effects by increasing the recovery of fecal L. paracasei. Both supplements had little effect on immunity. Twenty two healthy physically active male subjects (mean age = 33.9 ± 6.5y) were randomly allocated to either daily prebiotic or synbiotic supplementation for 21 d. Saliva, blood, urine and fecal samples were collected pre-, mid and post-intervention. Participants recorded patterns of physical activity on a self-reported questionnaire.
Assuntos
Carga Bacteriana , Dieta/métodos , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Lactobacillus/isolamento & purificação , Simbióticos , Adulto , Citocinas/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Ácidos Graxos/análise , Fezes/química , Fezes/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/imunologia , Humanos , Lactoferrina/análise , Masculino , Saliva/química , Soro/químicaRESUMO
Dietary non-digestible carbohydrates (NDC) play an important role in large-bowel health and one form of NDC, resistant starch (RS), can promote low levels of DNA damage and other markers of colonic health. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the ability of dietary RS or other NDC to influence colonic health, particularly DNA damage, is dependent on the type of dietary oil. We compared the effects of diets containing 10 % of NDC from cellulose, wheat bran, high-amylose maize starch (HAS, a rich source of RS type 2) or a retrograded HAS (RHAS, a rich source of RS type 3) on DNA damage, SCFA production and bacterial changes in the large bowel of rats. Each carbohydrate source was combined with 10 % fish oil (FO) or Sunola oil (SO; rich in oleic acid). There was a significant interaction between NDC and oil treatments on single-strand DNA breaks in colonocytes isolated from the colon. The damage in rats consuming RHAS was greater for FO consumption than for SO consumption. There was a significant interaction between NDC and oils on caecum weights and treatment effects of NDC and oils were observed for the weights and lengths of other gut tissues. Significant differences were found in colonic SCFA pools and caecal numbers of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis with the various NDC and oil treatments. The present results demonstrate that the effects of NDC and oils, particularly on colonic DNA damage, can depend on how they are combined within the diet.
Assuntos
Dano ao DNA , Carboidratos da Dieta/farmacologia , Gorduras Insaturadas na Dieta/farmacologia , Ácidos Graxos Voláteis/biossíntese , Intestino Grosso/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Ceco/efeitos dos fármacos , Ceco/microbiologia , Dieta , Interações Medicamentosas , Óleos de Peixe/farmacologia , Intestino Grosso/anatomia & histologia , Intestino Grosso/metabolismo , Masculino , Ácido Oleico/farmacologia , Tamanho do Órgão/efeitos dos fármacos , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-DawleyRESUMO
Previous studies have shown increased levels of colonocyte DNA damage (as measured by the comet assay) and thinning of the colonic mucus layer in rats fed higher dietary protein as casein or red meat with highly digestible starch. Feeding resistant starch (RS) as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) opposed these changes. However, the dietary level of HAMS was relatively high (48% by weight) so this study was conducted to establish whether HAMS had the same effects at lower dietary levels. Adult male rats were fed a diet containing 25% casein with 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% or 40% HAMS for 4 wk. DNA single strand breaks and 8-hydroxyguanosine levels were measured in isolated colonocytes by the comet assay. As expected, comet tail moment was greatest and the mucus barrier thinnest in rats fed 0% HAMS. DNA damage was reduced and the mucus barrier thickened in a logarithmic dose-dependent manner by HAMS. There was no significant difference in 8-hydroxyguanosine between dietary groups. Caecal and fecal short chain fatty acid (SCFA) pools rose with the increased level of dietary HAMS. DNA damage of colonocytes correlated negatively with caecal SCFA but the strongest correlation was with caecal butyrate, which is consistent with the proposed role of this SCFA in promoting a normal cell phenotype. These data show that HAMS prevents protein-induced colonic DNA damage in a dose-dependent manner. Inclusion of 10% HAMS was found to be sufficient to oppose colonocyte DNA damage, and to increase caecal and fecal SCFA pools.