Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(4): 581-586, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725337

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in treating elderly patients with atopic dermatitis from baseline to 52 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective observational real-life study was conducted in a group of elderly patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab for 52 weeks. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 65 years; diagnosis of atopic dermatitis made by an expert dermatologist; Eczema Area and Severity Index ≥ 24; and a contraindication, side effects, or failure to respond to cyclosporine. The primary outcome was the mean percentage reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline to week 52. Secondary measures included the mean percentage reduction in the Pruritus and Sleep Numerical Rating Scales and the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the types and rates of adverse events from baseline to week 52. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were eligible for the study. Flexural dermatitis was the most frequent clinical phenotype (63.8%). The coexistence of more than one clinical phenotype was found in 70/105 (66.6%) patients. We observed a reduction in all disease severity scores from baseline to week 52 (p < 0.001). Adverse events were recorded in 30/105 (28.6%) patients, with conjunctivitis and injection-site reaction the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, dupilumab is an effective and safe treatment for the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in patients aged over 65 years.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Conjuntivite/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Reação no Local da Injeção/epidemiologia , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Conjuntivite/induzido quimicamente , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/imunologia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Prurido/diagnóstico , Prurido/imunologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Dermatol Ther ; 31(6): e12735, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30334327

RESUMO

The main purpose of the present study was to compare the dermoscopic changes on vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) induced by two different 12-week treatment protocols, namely mometasone furoate 0.1% ointment plus tretinoin 0.05% cream in short-contact therapy (group A) versus the same corticosteroid plus emollient (group B). All dermoscopic images captured before and after treatment were assessed. Each dermoscopic variable selected for the study purpose was arbitrarily graded according to a 4-point scale by dermatologists blinded to both the time at which the images were captured and treatment allocation. Seventeen patients in group A and 15 in group B were included. The vessel mean dermoscopic scores increased significantly after treatment, whereas the scores of (a) patchy, structure-less, whitish areas, (b) whitish background, (c) comedo-like openings, and (d) purpuric blotches decreased. At the control visit, the two protocols did not differ significantly for any of the dermoscopic parameters, both in terms of mean score change and in the number of patients showing changes. Although the complementary action of the two molecules may suggest a therapeutic benefit, the association of tretinoin in short contact therapy with a potent corticosteroid did not induce significant changes in the dermoscopic features of VLS compared with the same corticosteroid alone.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Dermoscopia , Furoato de Mometasona/administração & dosagem , Tretinoína/administração & dosagem , Vulva/efeitos dos fármacos , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Cutânea , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Emolientes/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Furoato de Mometasona/efeitos adversos , Pomadas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do Tratamento , Tretinoína/efeitos adversos , Vulva/diagnóstico por imagem , Vulva/patologia , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/diagnóstico por imagem , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/patologia
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 74(5): 289-94, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26928795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Topical remedies based on botanical ingredients are popular. OBJECTIVES: To assess: (i) the usage of botanical substances in subjects affected with itching and chronic vulvar complaints; (ii) the incidence of side-effects associated with their use and the frequency of contact allergy; (iii) the diagnostic usefulness of patch testing. METHODS: Sixty-six patients were provided with a questionnaire to assess the prevalence and type of topical botanical preparations used and the occurrence of adverse reactions. Patients were patch tested with (i) the Italian baseline series, (ii) a topical medicament series, and (iii) a botanical series. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (63.6%) reported the use of natural topical products on the vulva. Seven (16.7%) noted adverse reactions; 27 showed positive reactions with the baseline series; 14 (21.2%) had at least one relevant reaction, mainly to allergens in topical products and cosmetics; and 2 (3%) showed positive reactions to the botanical series. Of the 7 patients complaining of adverse effects of botanical products, 3 (42.8%) showed relevant sensitization. CONCLUSIONS: The use of natural topical products is widespread among women affected with itching vulvar diseases. Contact dermatitis is a possible adverse effect. Botanical series are of questionable usefulness, owing to the wide variety of botanical ingredients.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Fitoterapia/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Prurido Vulvar/etiologia , Doenças da Vulva/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Líquen Plano/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurodermatite/etiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Psoríase/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Líquen Escleroso Vulvar/etiologia , Vulvite/etiologia
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 70(2): 90-7, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23909860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evidence on the safety of topical preparations containing botanical extracts is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess (i) the use of botanically derived compounds in a large population, (ii) the incidence of cutaneous side-effects, and (iii) the diagnostic usefulness of patch testing. METHODS: A questionnaire was used in 2661 patients to assess both the prevalence and type of topical botanical preparations used, and the occurrence of adverse skin reactions. Patients declaring adverse reactions were patch tested with (i) the Italian (SIDAPA) baseline series, (ii) an additional botanical series, and (iii) the patients' own products. RESULTS: Of the patients, 1274 (48%) reported the use of topical botanical products; 139 patients (11%) commented on adverse cutaneous reactions; 75 (54%) showed positive reactions with the Italian baseline series. Among the 122 patients tested with the botanical series, 19 (16%) showed positive reactions, in many cases with concomitant relevant positivity to at least one allergen of the Italian series connected with cosmetics. The commonest botanically derived allergens were propolis, Compositae extracts, and Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy is a possible adverse effect of natural products. Baseline series supplemented with the commonest botanical allergens may be adequate for detecting most of the cases of contact allergy to natural topical products.


Assuntos
Cosméticos/uso terapêutico , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Fitoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Cutânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/administração & dosagem , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Fitoterapia/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Própole/administração & dosagem , Própole/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Óleo de Melaleuca/administração & dosagem , Óleo de Melaleuca/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA