Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to ceftolozane-tazobactam due to ampC and/or ampD mutations observed during treatment using semi-mechanistic PKPD modeling.

A double ampC (AmpCG183D) and ampD (AmpDH157Y) genes mutations have been identified by whole genome sequencing in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PaS) that became resistant (PaR) in a patient treated by ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T). To precisely characterize the respective contributions of these mutations on the decreased susceptibility to C/T and on the parallel increased susceptibility to imipenem (IMI), mutants were generated by homologous recombination in PAO1 reference strain (PAO1- AmpCG183D, PAO1-AmpDH157Y, PAO1-AmpCG183D/AmpDH157Y) and in PaR (PaR-AmpCPaS/AmpDPaS). Sequential time-kill curve experiments were conducted on all strains and analyzed by semi-mechanistic PKPD modeling. A PKPD model with adaptation successfully described the data, allowing discrimination between initial and time-related (adaptive resistance) effects of mutations. With PAO1 and mutant-derived strains, initial EC50 values increased by 1.4, 4.1, and 29-fold after AmpCG183D , AmpDH157Y and AmpCG183D/AmpDH157Y mutations, respectively. EC50 values were increased by 320, 12.4, and 55-fold at the end of the 2 nd experiment. EC50 of PAO1-AmpCG183D/AmpDH157Y was higher than that of single mutants at any time of the experiments. Within the PaR clinical background, reversal of AmpCG183D, and AmpDH157Y mutations led to an important decrease of EC50 value, from 80.5 mg/L to 6.77 mg/L for PaR and PaR-AmpCPaS/AmpDPaS, respectively. The effect of mutations on IMI susceptibility mainly showed that the AmpCG183D mutation prevented the emergence of adaptive resistance. The model successfully described the separate and combined effect of AmpCG183D and AmpDH157Y mutations against C/T and IMI, allowing discrimination and quantification of the initial and time-related effects of mutations. This method could be reproduced in clinical strains to decipher complex resistance mechanisms.

Optimized Rhombic Experimental Dynamic Checkerboard Designs to Elucidate Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions of Antibiotics.

PURPOSE: Quantification of pharmacodynamic interactions is key in combination therapies, yet conventional checkerboard experiments with up to 10 by 10 combinations are labor-intensive. Therefore, this study provides optimized experimental rhombic checkerboard designs to enable an efficient interaction screening with significantly reduced experimental workload. METHODS: Based on the general pharmacodynamic interaction (GPDI) model implemented in Bliss Independence, a novel rhombic 'dynamic' checkerboard design with quantification of bacteria instead of turbidity as endpoint was developed. In stochastic simulations and estimations (SSE), the precision and accuracy of interaction parameter estimations and classification rates of conventional reference designs and the newly proposed rhombic designs based on effective concentrations (EC) were compared. RESULTS: Although a conventional rich design with 20-times as many combination scenarios provided estimates of interaction parameters with higher accuracy, precision and classification rates, the optimized rhombic designs with one natural growth scenario, three monotherapy scenarios per combination partner and only four combination scenarios were still superior to conventional reduced designs with twice as many combination scenarios. Additionally, the rhombic designs were able to identify whether an interaction occurred as a shift on maximum effect or EC50 with > 98%. Overall, effective concentration-based designs were found to be superior to traditional standard concentrations, but were more challenged by strong interaction sizes exceeding their adaptive concentration ranges. CONCLUSION: The rhombic designs proposed in this study enable a reduction of resources and labor and can be a tool to streamline higher throughput in drug interaction screening.

Preclinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data To Support Cefoxitin Nebulization for the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus.

Mycobacterium abscessus is responsible for difficult-to-treat chronic pulmonary infections in humans. Current regimens, including parenteral administrations of cefoxitin (FOX) in combination with amikacin and clarithromycin, raise compliance problems and are frequently associated with high failure and development of resistance. Aerosol delivery of FOX could be an interesting alternative. FOX was administered to healthy rats by intravenous bolus or intratracheal nebulization, and concentrations were determined in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. After intrapulmonary administration, the FOX area under the curve within ELF was 1,147 times higher than that in plasma, indicating that this route of administration offers a biopharmaceutical advantage over intravenous administration. FOX antimicrobial activity was investigated using time-kill curves combined with a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) type modeling approach in order to account for its in vitro instability that precludes precise determination of MIC. Time-kill data were adequately described by a model including in vitro degradation, a sensitive (S) and a resistant (R) bacteria subpopulation, logistic growth, and a maximal inhibition-type growth inhibition effect of FOX. Median inhibitory concentrations were estimated at 16.2 and 252 mg/liter for the S and R subpopulations, respectively. These findings suggest that parenteral FOX dosing regimens used in patients for the treatment of M. abscessus are not sufficient to reduce the bacterial burden and that FOX nebulization offers a potential advantage that needs to be further investigated.

Framework for optimisation of the clinical use of colistin and polymyxin B: the Prato polymyxin consensus.

In the face of diminishing therapeutic options for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria, clinicians are increasingly using colistin and polymyxin B. These antibiotics became available clinically in the 1950s, when understanding of antimicrobial pharmacology and regulatory requirements for approval of drugs was substantially less than today. At the 1st International Conference on Polymyxins in Prato, Italy, 2013, participants discussed a set of key objectives that were developed to explore the factors affecting the safe and effective use of polymyxins, identify the gaps in knowledge, and set priorities for future research. Participants identified several factors that affect the optimum use of polymyxins, including: confusion caused by several different conventions used to describe doses of colistin; an absence of appropriate pharmacopoeial standards for polymyxins; outdated and diverse product information; and uncertainties about susceptibility testing and breakpoints. High-priority areas for research included: better definition of the effectiveness of polymyxin-based combination therapy compared with monotherapy via well designed, randomised controlled trials; examination of the relative merits of colistin versus polymyxin B for various types of infection; investigation of pharmacokinetics in special patient populations; and definition of the role of nebulised polymyxins alone or in combination with intravenous polymyxins for the treatment of pneumonia. The key areas identified provide a roadmap for action regarding the continued use of polymyxins, and are intended to help with the effective and safe use of these important, last-line antibiotics.