Nonskeletal and skeletal effects of high doses versus low doses of vitamin D3 in renal transplant recipients: Results of the VITALE (VITamin D supplementation in renAL transplant recipients) study, a randomized clinical trial.

Vitamin D sufficiency is associated with a reduced risk of fractures, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular events, and cancers, which are frequent complications after renal transplantation. The VITALE (VITamin D supplementation in renAL transplant recipients) study is a multicenter double-blind randomized trial, including nondiabetic adult renal transplant recipients with serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH) vitamin D) levels of <30 ng/mL, which is randomized 12 to 48 months after transplantation to receive high (100 000 IU) or low doses (12 000 IU) of cholecalciferol every 2 weeks for 2 months and then monthly for 22 months. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint, including diabetes mellitus, major cardiovascular events, cancer, and death. Of 536 inclusions (50.8 [13.7] years, 335 men), 269 and 267 inclusions were in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively. The serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels increased by 23 versus 6 ng/mL in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively (P < .0001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 15% versus 16% of the patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, experienced a first event of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.94 [0.60-1.48]; P = .78), whereas 1% and 4% of patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, experienced an incident symptomatic fracture (odds ratio, 0.24 [0.07-0.86], P = .03). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. After renal transplantation, high doses of cholecalciferol are safe but do not reduce extraskeletal complications (trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT01431430).

Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) must not be considered as an endocrine disruptor / Le cholécalciférol (la vitamine D3) ne doit pas être inclus dans la liste des perturbateurs endocriniens

A French ministerial decree planning to include cholecalciferol, i.e. vitamin D3 (VD3), in the endocrine disruptors (ED) list has generated a lot of concerns in French physicians and scientists. The aim of the present article was to discuss the scientific rationale that may support or not this decision, which seems to be due to the use of VD3 overdose as a rodenticide in some European countries. First, it is noticeable that cholecalciferol is not an "exogenous substance", a term used in all the definitions of ED, as it is largely synthesized in the skin after UVB rays exposure. Second, we did not find any published article that may support the inclusion of VD3 in the ED list. The request "vitamin D AND endocrine disruptor" reported 33 references in the PubMed database on March, 10, 2022, most of them discussing disturbances of vitamin D metabolism by EDs. Third, a large amount of studies conclude that VD3 has or may have beneficial effects on many functions that are known to be altered by EDs. In addition, we warn that learning that VD3 could be legally considered as a PE may cause the general public to mistrust vitamin D supplementation, which is not desirable in terms of public health as it may increase the already too high prevalence of vitamin D deficient individuals. We consider the aberrant decision of including cholecalciferol in the ED list should be rapidly invalidated before being effective in France and possibly disseminated in the European Union.

Un projet d'arrêté ministériel inscrivant le cholécalciférol, c'est-à-dire la vitamine D3 (VD3), dans la liste des perturbateurs endocriniens (PE) est à l'origine de débats en France. L'objectif de notre article était de préciser les arguments scientifiques pour et contre l'inscription de la VD3 dans la liste des PE, qui semble être initialement due à son utilisation à très forte dose comme raticide/rodenticide dans certains pays. Premièrement, le cholécalciférol ne peut être défini comme une substance exogène, terme utilisé dans les différentes définitions des PE, car il est largement synthétisé dans la peau suite à l'exposition aux UVB. Deuxièmement, il n'existe aucune publication dans la base de données PubMed en faveur d'une inscription de la VD3 dans la liste des PE. La requête « vitamin D AND endocrine disruptor ¼ retrouvait 33 références au 10 mars 2022, la plupart évoquant des perturbations du métabolisme de la vitamine D par les PE. Troisièmement, un grand nombre d'études concluent, au contraire, que la VD3 a des effets bénéfiques sur de nombreuses fonctions altérées par les PE. Plus largement, nous alertons sur le fait qu'apprendre que la VD3 pourrait être règlementairement considérée comme un PE pourrait occasionner, auprès du grand public, une défiance vis-à-vis de la supplémentation en vitamine D, ce qui n'est pas souhaitable en termes de santé publique car de nature à aggraver la prévalence déjà trop élevée des individus carencés en vitamine D. Il est encore temps d'éviter cette décision aberrante et non fondée.

Vitamin D and pregnancy outcomes: Overall results of the FEPED study.

Vitamin D insufficiency is highly prevalent in children and adults including pregnant women. During pregnancy, maternal vitamin D insufficiency could increase risks of several pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes. The FEPED study was designed to assess the effects of maternal vitamin D status in the first trimester during pregnancy on risks of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preterm birth and small-for-gestational age (SGA) at birth. This observational prospective cohort included 3129 women with a singleton pregnancy between April 2012 and July 2014 in six maternity units in France and Belgium. The aim of this review is to summarize the results of the FEPED study. At the first trimester the mean 25(OH)D concentration was 21.9 ± 10.4 ng/mL and 25(OH)D concentration was <20 ng/mL in 46.5 % of patients. After matching 83 cases of preeclampsia with 319 controls, a significant decrease in the risk of preeclampsia was associated with maternal vitamin D levels ≥ 30 ng/mL in the third trimesters (OR = 0.34; 95 % CI: 0.13-0.86. P = 0.023). In the first trimester, the risk for preeclampsia was decreased in these patients, but did not achieve statistical significance (OR = 0.57 95 % CI, 0.30-1.01; p = 0.09). For the 250 cases with GDM matched with 941 controls, no linear relationship was found between GDM and 25OHD levels in the first trimester of pregnancy. Finally, 2813 pregnant women were included in analyses of risks of preterm and SGA birth. No association was found between low maternal vitamin D levels in the first trimester and the risks of preterm birth (aOR = 1.53; 95 % CI: 0.97-2.43) or SGA (aOR = 1.07; 95 % CI: 0.75-1.54). Further investigation is needed to understand the mechanisms behind the association between vitamin D and birth outcomes.

Vitamin D status during pregnancy and in cord blood in a large prospective French cohort.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Vitamin D status during pregnancy and in newborns has never been studied in France. This study aims at determining the vitamin D status during the first and third trimesters of pregnancy (T1, T3) and in cord blood (CB) in the middle-north of France. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in five French centers (latitude 47.22 to 48.86°N). Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations were measured using a radioimmunoassay during T1, T3 and in CB. According to the French guidelines, pregnant women received cholecalciferol, 100,000 IU, in the seventh month. RESULTS: Between April 2012 and July 2014, 2832 women were included, of whom 2803 were analyzed (mean ± SD age: 31.5 ± 5.0 years; phototypes 5-6: 21.8%). Three and 88.6% of participants received supplementation during the month before inclusion and in the seventh month, respectively. At T1, T3, and CB, mean 25(OH)D concentrations were 21.9 ± 10.4, 31.8 ± 11.5, and 17.0 ± 7.2 ng/mL, respectively, and 25(OH)D was <20 ng/mL in 46.5%, 14.0%, and 68.5%, respectively. At T1, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, dark phototypes, sampling outside summer, and no supplementation before inclusion were independently associated with vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL). Women who received cholecalciferol supplementation in month 7 had higher 25(OH)D at T3 than non-supplemented women (32.5 ± 11.4 versus 25.8 ± 11.4 ng/mL, p = <0.001) and marginally higher 25(OH)D in CB (17.2 ± 7.2 versus 15.5 ± 7.1 ng/mL, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recommended supplementation, vitamin D insufficiency is frequent during pregnancy and in newborns in France.

VITamin D supplementation in renAL transplant recipients (VITALE): a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial of vitamin D estimating the benefit and safety of vitamin D3 treatment at a dose of 100,000 UI compared with a dose of 12,000 UI in renal transplant recipients: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In addition to their effects on bone health, high doses of cholecalciferol may have beneficial non-classic effects including the reduction of incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. These pleiotropic effects have been documented in observational and experimental studies or in small intervention trials. Vitamin D insufficiency is a frequent finding in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), and this population is at risk of the previously cited complications. METHODS/DESIGN: The VITALE study is a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with two parallel groups that will include a total of 640 RTRs. RTRs with vitamin D insufficiency, defined as circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of less than 30 ng/ml (or 75 nmol/l), will be randomized between 12 and 48 months after transplantation to blinded groups to receive vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) either at high or low dose (respectively, 100,000 UI or 12,000 UI every 2 weeks for 2 months then monthly for 22 months) with a follow-up of 2 years. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the benefit/risk ratio of high-dose versus low-dose cholecalciferol on a composite endpoint consisting of de novo diabetes mellitus; major cardiovascular events; de novo cancer; and patient death. Secondary endpoints will include blood pressure (BP) control; echocardiography findings; the incidences of infection and acute rejection episodes; renal allograft function using estimated glomerular filtration rate; proteinuria; graft survival; bone mineral density; the incidence of fractures; and biological relevant parameters of mineral metabolism. DISCUSSION: We previously reported that the intensive cholecalciferol treatment (100 000 IU every 2 weeks for 2 months) was safe in RTR. Using a pharmacokinetic approach, we showed that cholecalciferol 100,000 IU monthly should maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at above 30 ng/ml but below 80 ng/ml after renal transplantation. Taken together, these results are reassuring regarding the safety of the cholecalciferol doses that will be used in the VITALE study. Analysis of data collected during the VITALE study will demonstrate whether high or low-dose cholecalciferol is beneficial in RTRs with vitamin D insufficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01431430.

[Influence of vitamin D on cardiovascular risk]. / Influence de la vitamine D sur le risque cardiovasculaire.

Few interventional studies have reported a positive effect of native vitamin D supplementation on intermediary parameters of insulin resistance, of cardiovascular risk and on major cardiovascular events and mortality.

[Vitamin D and pregnancy]. / Vitamine D et grossesse.

Vitamin D insufficiency is characterized, since 2005, by 25(OH)D concentration less than 75 nmol/L (or 30 ng/mL). Vitamin D could interfere with many mechanisms involved in preeclampsia's pathogenesis including trophoblastic invasion and immunomodulation as well as blood pressure control and proteinuria. Occurrence of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes seems to be linked to vitamin D deficiency but recent data in the literature are contradictory. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy is controversial. Some societies consider it unnecessary and others recommend up to 2000 UI/d. There is no reported case of teratogenicity linked with vitamin D intake.

Determination of optimal cholecalciferol treatment in renal transplant recipients using a population pharmacokinetic approach.

PURPOSE: No information on optimal cholecalciferol dosing in kidney transplant patients is currently available because the time-course of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate 25(OH)D pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients and to determine the optimal dosage scheme allowing 25(OH)D concentrations to be maintained between 30-80 ng/mL during the first year post-transplantation. METHODS: Four months after renal transplantation, 49 patients received four oral doses of 100,000 IU cholecalciferol every 2 weeks (intensive phase), then every 2 months until 1 year after transplantation (maintenance phase). A control group of 47 transplanted patients was not supplemented but underwent blood sampling. In the treated group, 74 samples were collected before the first cholecalciferol administration and 119 thereafter. Two blood samples per patient were collected in the control group. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were analyzed using a population approach. The turnover of 25(OH)D was modeled using a one-compartment-model with first-order formation and elimination and basal concentration. RESULTS: The mean population parameter estimates and the associated between-subject variability were: formation rate constant (k(f)), 0.11 day(-1); clearance (CL/F), 2.5 L/day (0.42); central volume of distribution (V(C)/F), 237 L; basal concentration (C(0)),12.82 ng/mL (0.41). Based on these values, in order to maintain 25(OH)D concentrations between 30 and 80 ng/mL, cholecalciferol dosing should be six successive administrations of 100,000 IU at 2-week intervals, followed by 100,000 IU once a month until the end of the first year. CONCLUSIONS: We present here the first pharmacokinetic model describing the time-course of 25(OH)D. We propose an optimal and practical scheme for the treatment of vitamin D insufficiency after renal transplantation. Taking into account the numerous effects of vitamin D on health, this scheme could help clinicians improve the care of kidney recipients.

Relationship between vitamin D deficiency and bone fragility in sickle cell disease: a cohort study of 56 adults.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have profound vitamin D (VD) deficiency. Limited data exist on the effect of VD deficiency on bone fragility in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of VD deficiency in adults with SCD and its consequences on bone metabolism and fragility. METHODS: This prospective study included 56 SCD adult patients (mean age 29.8 ± 9.5 years), in a clinically steady state. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Fracture history, BMD, avascular osteonecrosis, H-shaped vertebra and markers of mineral metabolism were compared between two groups of patients presenting very low (≤ 6 ng/mL, n=26) (group 1) and low (>6 ng/mL, n=26) (group 2) 25(OH)D concentration, respectively. RESULTS: Median 25(OH)D concentration was 6 ng/mL. VD deficiency (25(OH)D <10 ng/mL) was found in 42 out of 56 patients (75%) and secondary hyperparathyroidism in 40 (71.4%). History of fracture was documented in 17 patients (30.3%), osteopenia and/or osteoporosis in 39.6% of patients. Overall, patients of group 1 were more likely to have sustained a fracture (42.8%) compared to patients of group 2 (17.8%) (p=0.04). These patients had also lower body mass index and significantly higher parathyroid hormone, C-terminal telopeptides of type I-collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase serum levels. There was no difference between group for BMD, avascular osteonecrosis history, H-shaped vertebra, and disease severity markers. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that VD deficiency is a key feature in SCD-bone disease. It is highly prevalent and associated with hyperparathyroidism, bone resorption markers, and history of fracture. The optimal supplementation regimen remains to be determined.

Cholecalciferol supplementation does not protect against renal allograft structural and functional deterioration: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Apart from their important role in mediating calcium homeostasis, vitamin D derivatives regulate numerous vitamin D receptor-mediated renoprotective cellular functions including cell differentiation, negative regulation of inflammation, and fibrosis. Renal models of chronic kidney injury and clinical observational studies have suggested that vitamin D analogues may protect against the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), interstitial inflammation, and fibrosis. METHODS: The aim of this retrospective study is to test whether oral supplementation with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) between 3 and 12 months posttransplantation confers a structural and functional nephroprotection in a population of 64 renal transplant patients, using historical controls. We analyzed glomerular filtration rates using iohexol clearance, urinary procollagen III aminoterminal propeptide excretion, and epithelial phenotypic changes as markers of the EMT and Banff scores at 3 and 12 months after transplantation in 64 renal transplant recipients with or without cholecalciferol supplementation between months 3 and 12. RESULTS: Cholecalciferol supplementation in stable renal transplant recipients did not prevent EMT, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, or renal function deterioration. CONCLUSION: Our results challenge the experimental data, suggesting that vitamin D-analog supplementation confers nephroprotection. These findings should be confirmed by randomized prospective studies.

Hemolysis in a patient with alkaptonuria and chronic kidney failure.

In alkaptonuria, the absence of homogentisic acid oxidase results in the accumulation of homogentisic acid (HGA) in the body. Fatal disease cases are infrequent, and death often results from kidney or cardiac complications. We report a 24-year-old alkaptonuric man with severe decreased kidney function who developed fatal metabolic acidosis and intravascular hemolysis. Hemolysis may have been caused by rapid and extensive accumulation of HGA and subsequent accumulation of plasma soluble melanins. Toxic effects of plasma soluble melanins, their intermediates, and reactive oxygen side products are increased when antioxidant mechanisms are overwhelmed. A decrease in serum antioxidative activity has been reported in patients with chronic decreased kidney function. However, despite administration of large doses of an antioxidant agent and ascorbic acid and intensive kidney support, hemolysis and acidosis could not be brought under control and hemolysis led to the death of the patient.

Effects of vitamin D supplementation on the calcium-phosphate balance in renal transplant patients.

Low serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D frequently occur after renal transplantation, but few studies have evaluated the effects of normalizing this on serum parathyroid hormone and calcium levels or urinary calcium excretion. To determine this we compared the outcomes of 94 renal transplant patients with low 25-hydroxy vitamin D and normal serum calcium levels who were either treated or not with cholecalciferol every 2 weeks for 2 months (intensive phase) followed by an every other month maintenance phase. The biological characteristics of the two equally divided patient groups did not differ before treatment. After the intensive phase, serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were normalized in all but 3 patients and the serum parathyroid hormone decreased and calcium levels increased with no severe adverse effects. During the maintenance phase, the serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level decreased but remained significantly higher than in controls. In the control group, the serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration increased slightly but became normal in only three patients. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were significantly higher and parathyroid hormone levels were lower in treated patients compared to controls one year following transplant. Hence, cholecalciferol treatment significantly increased serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and decreased parathyroid hormone levels with no adverse effects in 25-hydroxy vitamin D-deficient renal transplant patients.