Control of robotic assistance using poststroke residual voluntary effort.

Poststroke hemiparesis limits the ability to reach, in part due to involuntary muscle co-activation (synergies). Robotic approaches are being developed for both therapeutic benefit and continuous assistance during activities of daily living. Robotic assistance may enable participants to exert less effort, thereby reducing expression of the abnormal co-activation patterns, which could allow participants to reach further. This study evaluated how well participants could perform a reaching task with robotic assistance that was either provided independent of effort in the vertical direction or in the sagittal plane in proportion to voluntary effort estimated from electromyograms (EMG) on the affected side. Participants who could not reach targets without assistance were enabled to reach further with assistance. Constant anti-gravity force assistance that was independent of voluntary effort did not reduce the quality of reach and enabled participants to exert less effort while maintaining different target locations. Force assistance that was proportional to voluntary effort on the affected side enabled participants to exert less effort and could be controlled to successfully reach targets, but participants had increased difficulty maintaining a stable position. These results suggest that residual effort on the affected side can produce an effective command signal for poststroke assistive devices.

Functional electrical stimulation to augment poststroke reach and hand opening in the presence of voluntary effort: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Hemiparesis after stroke can severely limit an individual's ability to perform activities of daily living. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has the potential to generate functional arm and hand movements. We have observed that FES can produce functional hand opening when a stroke patient is relaxed, but the FES-produced hand opening is often overpowered by finger flexor coactivation in response to patient attempts to reach and open the hand. OBJECTIVE: To determine if stimulating both reaching muscles and hand opening muscles makes it possible to achieve useful amounts of simultaneous reach and hand opening even in the presence of submaximal reaching effort. METHODS: We measured reach and hand opening during a reach-then-open the hand task under different combinations of voluntary effort and FES for both reach and hand opening. RESULTS: As effort was reduced and stimulation generated more movement, a greater amount of reach and hand opening was achieved. For the first time, this study quantified the effect of voluntary effort for reach and hand opening on stimulated hand opening. It also showed variability in the interaction of voluntary effort and stimulation between participants. Additionally, when participants were instructed to reach with partial effort during simultaneous FES, they achieved greater reach and hand opening. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous reaching and FES hand opening is improved by including FES for reach and reducing voluntary effort. In the future, an upper extremity neuroprosthesis that uses a combination of voluntary effort and FES assistance may enable users to perform activities of daily living.

Variations in neuromuscular electrical stimulation's ability to increase reach and hand opening during voluntary effort after stroke.

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) has shown potential as a mechanism to augment functional arm and hand movement after stroke. However, neuroprostheses that combine voluntary effort and FES must account for co-activation patterns (synergies) that limit movement. The goal of this study is to explore the conditions under which voluntary effort and FES can be combined to achieve useful reach and hand opening in different subjects. Subjects performed a reach and hand opening task where different levels of voluntary effort and FES were applied to produce reach and hand opening while measuring the resulting hand opening and distance from a target. Initial results indicate that there are significant variations between participants and how much effort can be exerted while still eliciting effective reach and hand opening.

Functional restoration of elbow extension after spinal-cord injury using a neural network-based synergistic FES controller.

Individuals with a C5/C6 spinal-cord injury (SCI) have paralyzed elbow extensors, yet retain weak to strong voluntary control of elbow flexion and some shoulder movements. They lack elbow extension, which is critical during activities of daily living. This research focuses on the functional evaluation of a developed synergistic controller employing remaining voluntary elbow flexor and shoulder electromyography (EMG) to control elbow extension with functional electrical stimulation (FES). Remaining voluntarily controlled upper extremity muscles were used to train an artificial neural network (ANN) to control stimulation of the paralyzed triceps. Surface EMG was collected from SCI subjects while they produced isometric endpoint force vectors of varying magnitude and direction using triceps stimulation levels predicted by a biomechanical model. ANNs were trained with the collected EMG and stimulation levels. We hypothesized that once trained and implemented in real-time, the synergistic controller would provide several functional benefits. We anticipated the synergistic controller would provide a larger range of endpoint force vectors, the ability to grade and maintain forces, the ability to complete a functional overhead reach task, and use less overall stimulation than a constant stimulation scheme.

Restoration of elbow extension via functional electrical stimulation in individuals with tetraplegia.

Functional electrical stimulation of the triceps is a method of restoring elbow extension to individuals with paralyzed triceps. Eleven arms of individuals with cervical-level spinal cord injuries (SCIs) received a triceps electrode as an addition to a hand-grasp neuroprosthesis. Stimulation was controlled either as part of a preprogrammed pattern or via a switch or an accelerometer that was connected to the neuroprosthesis external controller. The outcome measures were (1) elbow extension moments at different elbow positions, (2) performance in controllable workspace experiments, and (3) comparison to an alternative method of providing elbow extension in these individuals--a posterior deltoid (PD) to triceps tendon transfer. Stimulated elbow extension moments in 11 arms ranged from 0.8 to 13.3 N.m. The stimulated elbow extension moments varied with elbow angle in a manner consistent with the length-tension properties of the triceps. Triceps stimulation provided a significantly stronger elbow extension moment than the PD to triceps tendon transfer. The elbow extension moment generated by the tendon transfer and triceps electrode being activated together was always greater than either method used separately. Stimulation of the long head of the triceps should be avoided in persons with weak shoulder abduction, since the long head adducts the shoulder and limits shoulder function in these cases. Statistically, elbow extension neuroprostheses significantly increased the ability to successfully reach and move an object and significantly decreased the time required to acquire an object while reaching.