Current management and clinical outcomes for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

Aims: Historical studies of ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have shown high long-term success rates and low complication rates. The potential impact of several recent practice trends has not been described. This study aims to characterize recent clinical practice trends in AVNRT ablation and their associated success rates and complications. Methods and results: Patients undergoing initial ablation of AVNRT between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2015 were included in this study. Patient demographics and procedural data were abstracted from procedure reports. Follow-up data, including AVNRT recurrence and complications, was evaluated through electronic medical record review. In total, 877 patients underwent catheter ablation for AVNRT. By the last recorded year, three-dimension (3D) electroanatomical mapping (EAM) was used in 36.2%, 43.2% included anaesthesia, and 23.1% utilized irrigated catheters. Long-term procedural success was 95.5%. The use of anaesthesia, 3D EAM, and irrigated ablation catheters were not associated with differences in success. The presence of an atrial 'echo' or 'AH' jump at the end of an acutely successful procedure was not associated with long-term recurrence (P = 0.18, P = 0.15, respectively). Complications, including AV block requiring a pacemaker (0.4%), were uncommon. Conclusion: In a large, contemporary cohort, catheter ablation for AVNRT remains highly successful with low complications rates. The increased use of anaesthesia as well as modern mapping and ablation tools were not associated with changes in clinical outcomes. Further prospective evaluation of such contemporary practices is warranted given the lack of evidence to support their escalating use.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy: Predictors of Appropriate Therapy, Outcomes, and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy is characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Once the diagnosis is established, risk stratification to determine whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement is warranted is critical. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cohort included 312 patients (163 men, age at presentation 33.6±13.9 years) with definite arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy who received an ICD. Over 8.8±7.33 years, 186 participants (60%) had appropriate ICD therapy and 58 (19%) had an intervention for ventricular fibrillation/flutter. Ventricular tachycardia at presentation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.49; P<0.001), inducibility on electrophysiology study (HR: 3.14; 95% CI, 1.95-5.05; P<0.001), male sex (HR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.20-2.19; P=0.001), inverted T waves in ≥3 precordial leads (HR: 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.52; P=0.018), and premature ventricular contraction count ≥1000/24 hours (HR: 2.30; 95% CI, 1.32-4.00; P=0.003) were predictors of any appropriate ICD therapy. Inducibility at electrophysiology study (HR: 2.28; 95% CI, 1.10-4.70; P=0.025) remained as the only predictor after multivariable analysis. The predictors for ventricular fibrillation/flutter were premature ventricular contraction ≥1000/24 hours (HR: 4.39; 95% CI, 1.32-14.61; P=0.016), syncope (HR: 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.11; P=0.021), aged ≤30 years at presentation (HR: 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-3.00; P<0.036), and male sex (HR: 1.73; 95% CI, 1.01-2.97; P=0.046). Younger age at presentation (HR: 3.14; 95% CI, 1.32-7.48; P=0.010) and high premature ventricular contraction burden (HR: 4.43; 95% CI, 1.35-14.57; P<0.014) remained as independent predictors of ventricular fibrillation/flutter. Complications occurred in 66 participants (21%), and 64 (21%) had inappropriate ICD interventions. Overall mortality was low at 2%, and 4% underwent heart transplantation. CONCLUSION: These findings represent an important step in identifying predictors of ICD therapy for potentially fatal ventricular fibrillation/flutter and should be considered when developing a risk stratification model for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.