The Lived Experience of Young Adult Cancer Survivors after Treatment: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to compare the lived experiences among extended (one year or less post-treatment) and long-term (three years or more post-treatment) young adult (YA) cancer survivors (ages 18-39 years old). METHODS: Two trained researchers conducted semi-structured interviews inquiring about the overall lived experience of N = 24 YA cancer survivors (n = 12 extended and n = 12 long-term). The same two researchers independently completed line-by-line coding and thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Interviews lasted an average of 41 min and revealed common themes of symptoms, psychosocial concerns, coping, and changes in health behaviors (e.g., nutrition and physical activity). All participants discussed symptoms impairing their quality of life and affecting their fear of recurrence. Specific psychosocial concerns among extended survivors were appearance-related (e.g., hair loss, weight gain) whereas concerns among long-term survivors included job loss, fertility, and financial stress. Coping strategies described by extended survivors were often distraction-based (e.g., watching television to "escape"), while long-term survivors described more active coping strategies (e.g., yoga, meditation, and seeking support from family and friends). Most survivors reflected on limited physical activity or unhealthy eating during treatment; however, nearly all declared healthy eating and physical activity post-treatment to improve well-being. CONCLUSIONS: YA cancer survivors report differing symptoms, psychosocial concerns, and coping strategies across time since treatment. While survivors reported challenges with physical activity and nutrition during treatment, nearly all emphasized the importance of these health behaviors post-treatment. Thus, health behavior interventions could represent a preferred approach to address post-treatment challenges and improve quality of life for YA survivors.

Mindfulness in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): A Qualitative Study.

Previous adolescent and young adult (AYA) research suggests patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) experience severe physiological stress. The goal of this study was to identify unmet needs, interests, and preferences for mindfulness to inform the development of a mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at three time points: prior to (n = 20), immediately after (n = 13), and three months post HSCT (n = 16) in the same AYA patients. Interviews assessed stress reduction strategies used, interest in mindfulness, and current quality of life. Three major thematic categories emerged from interview data across all time points: Concerns, Coping Strategies, and Mindfulness Activities. Prior to HSCT, two additional themes emerged including: Hope for the Future and Getting the Body Moving-Physical Activity. Most participants were not familiar with the term "mindfulness" prior to HSCT; but after being provided the definition of mindfulness, participants expressed interest in an online mindfulness-based intervention (e.g., ZOOM), stating: "I think it's necessary" and "It would definitely be useful". Participants suggested an intervention immediately following HSCT may decrease isolation concerns stating: "[in the hospital] You kind of feel like a hamster in a cage" and "you obviously have a lot of time to just be sitting by yourself in a hospital room". The results suggest that a mindfulness-based online intervention is of interest to AYA HSCT patients and may be beneficial in decreasing physiological stress and improving quality of life.

Feasibility Outcomes of a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial to Increase Cruciferous and Green Leafy Vegetable Intake in Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Higher intakes of cruciferous vegetables (CVs) and green leafy vegetables (GLVs) in observational studies are associated with improvements in survival and cancer-related biomarkers in patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC). These results have yet to be corroborated in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of implementing a 12-week RCT to increase CV and GLV intake in posttreatment HNC survivors. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a two-arm RCT conducted among 24 posttreatment HNC survivors. Survivors were recruited from a southeastern, National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 2015 and September 2016. INTERVENTION: There were two groups: (1) an experimental group (n=12) receiving weekly 15- to 30-minute telephone dietary counseling from a registered dietitian nutritionist stressing 2.5 cups per week CVs and 3.5 cups per week GLVs, and (2) an attention control group (n=12) receiving weekly 15- to 30-minute telephone dietary counseling from a registered dietitian nutritionist focusing on general healthy eating for cancer survivors. Participants completed a baseline survey, three 24-hour dietary recalls, phlebotomy, and anthropometric measures prior to randomization and at the end of the 12-week study period. The experimental group also completed weekly vegetable record recalls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included feasibility, recruitment, retention, adherence, and safety. Secondary outcomes included inflammatory markers and carotenoids. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive statistics were generated for demographic, epidemiological, and clinical variables as well as the primary feasibility outcomes. Between- and within-group comparisons of mean serum cytokine and carotenoid levels were performed using appropriate statistical tests depending on their respective distributions for the purpose of generating preliminary effect sizes. RESULTS: Overall, 350 incident HNC cases were screened for eligibility, and 98 were eligible for study participation. Reasons for ineligibility and exclusion included deceased (n=93); wrong or inactive telephone numbers, or unable to be reached, or lost to follow-up (n=93); not meeting inclusion criteria (n=39); and too ill to participate (n=27). Of the 98 eligible HNC cases, 24 agreed to participate, for an enrollment rate of 25%. The most common reason for nonparticipation was distance (n=48), as participants were asked to report for two on-site assignments. The retention rate was 96%. Mean intervention adherence rates for weekly goals were 67% CV, 74% GLV, and 71% overall. Completion rate of weekly counseling calls was 90%. The experimental group reported an overall mean increase of 5.5 cups GLV and 3.5 cups CV per week from baseline intake, respectively. No significant between- or within-arm differences were observed for inflammatory markers or carotenoids. CONCLUSION: A posttreatment intervention aimed at increasing CV and GLV intake in HNC survivors is feasible. A larger RCT is needed to assess the efficacy of this intervention on disease outcomes.