Colistin efficacy in an experimental model of Acinetobacter baumannii endocarditis.

The in-vivo activity of colistin was evaluated in an experimental rabbit model of Acinetobacter baumannii endocarditis with a strain susceptible to colistin and intermediate to imipenem. Compared to a control group, colistin was effective (p < 0.05) in bacterial clearance from blood and in the sterilisation of blood cultures, but was not effective in clearing A. baumannii from vegetations. Thus, although colistin may be effective in treating bacteraemia caused by susceptible strains of A. baumannii, it may not be a suitable treatment for endocarditis, perhaps because of poor penetration into vegetations and a low C(max)/MIC ratio in tissue.

Sulbactam efficacy in experimental models caused by susceptible and intermediate Acinetobacter baumannii strains.

Sulbactam and imipenem were compared in an experimental pneumonia model in immunocompetent mice, using a susceptible strain of Acinetobacter baumannii, and in an experimental endocarditis model in rabbits, using an intermediately susceptible strain. In the former, sulbactam was as efficacious as imipenem in terms of survival, sterility of lungs and in the bacterial clearance from lungs and blood, provided that the t > MIC for sulbactam (1.84 h) was similar to that for imipenem (2.01 h). In the endocarditis model, imipenem (t > MIC, 2.12 h) was more efficacious than sulbactam (t > MIC, 1.17 h) in bacterial clearance from vegetations. These results show the efficacy of sulbactam in infections caused by susceptible strains of A. baumannii, with an MIC up to 4 mg/L, provided that doses reach a t > MIC similar to that of imipenem. The activity of sulbactam was time dependent.

Imipenem, doxycycline and amikacin in monotherapy and in combination in Acinetobacter baumannii experimental pneumonia.

Acinetobacter baumannii is a common cause of nosocomial pneumonia and other nosocomial infections. Multiresistant A. baumannii has also a high prevalence, which can make effective treatment difficult. We designed a new model of A. baumannii experimental pneumonia using C57BL/6 immunocompetent mice. This model was used to compare the efficacy of imipenem, doxycycline and amikacin in monotherapy, and the combination of imipenem plus amikacin and doxycycline plus amikacin. Doxycycline plus amikacin were synergic in vitro after 24 h incubation, whereas imipenem plus amikacin showed no in vitro synergy. The number of sterile lungs and the lung clearance of A. baumannii were greater in the group treated with imipenem than in those treated with amikacin or doxycycline in monotherapy (P < 0.05). The combination of imipenem plus amikacin and doxycycline plus amikacin was no more effective than imipenem alone in the clearance of organisms from lungs (2.42 +/- 1.46 cfu/g versus 2.7 +/- 1.5 cfu/g versus 1.23 +/- 1.02 cfu/g). These results suggest that the addition of amikacin does not improve the results obtained by imipenem monotherapy. Doxycycline plus amikacin is an alternative to imipenem in the therapy of A. baumannii pneumonia.