The psychological support for women who underwent a stillbirth during their pregnancy: the quality of midwifery care.

PURPOSE: This review aims to investigate the role of midwifery care in perinatal death. Specifically, it aims to investigate the type and implications in the clinical practice of psychological and psychiatric support interventions for women/couples. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. For this purpose, the following databases were queried: PubMed, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and ERIC, considering only studies published in the 2002-2022 time frame. RESULTS: 14 studies were found to be eligible by the literature review. These researches were divided into 3 macro-topics representing the most crucial factors in influencing the quality of care: the healthcare setting, the experience and training of caregivers, and the experience of parents. DISCUSSION: The healthcare figure who experiences such a tragic event most closely is the midwife. The health and geographic context in which care is provided - understood to be low-medium-high resources - have a fundamental impact on the quality of midwifery care and caregiver satisfaction. The training was found to be incomplete, and midwives' experiences revealed how they felt unprepared. Parents' experiences indicate the need for multidisciplinary care, better communicability, and follow-up including psychological/psychiatric support for mothers who are increasingly alone in coping with bereavement. To date, there are no guidelines for psychological support for this specific event in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Birth-death management should be a structured part of professional courses so that new generations of midwives can improve the quality of care for affected families. Future research should focus on how to improve communication processes, and hospital centers should adopt protocols adapted to the needs of parents, including a midwifery-led model policy based on psychological support for the mothers/couples involved, as well as increase follow-ups.

Cancer screenings among sexual and gender minorities by midwives' point of view.

INTRODUCTION: Although women belonging to sexual and gender minorities are more at risk of gynecological and breast cancer, pieces of evidence have been provided that this population finds hardships getting involved in cancer screening programs. This happens because they tend to avoid clinical settings because of fear of discrimination, heteronormative assumptions, heterosexism, classism, and homophobic slurs by healthcare professionals. On the other hand, medical programs that allow healthcare providers to have experience with LGBTQ people are scarce and there are no specific tools to assess sexual cancer risks in this population. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Studies included were obtained searching MEDLINE with keywords "lesbians," "queer women," "trans women," "LGBTQ women," "cervical cancer screening," "pap test," "oncology screening," "mammogram" and "prevention." Furthermore, 1577 papers were found. After filtering for species, sex, language, and time range, 820 papers were left. The number of works included was 24 after title screening and 20 after abstract screening and full-text screening. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: More research will be needed to develop tools with an inclusive, non-judgmental, and open language capable of engaging the LGBTQ community. Cancer screening programs involve a large variety of healthcare providers including midwives. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives are multifaceted healthcare professionals whose large competence spectrum includes a variety of knowledge and skills going from antenatal care to education and research and they may efficiently provide cancer screenings. Midwives have been asking for more specialistic roles and calling for specific instruction to face the complex and ever-changing reality.

Advanced midwifery practice: intrapartum ultrasonography to assess fetal head station and comparison with vaginal digital examination.

BACKGROUND: Vaginal digital examination is considered the gold standard to evaluate patients during labor and delivery. However, transperineal ultrasound has been suggested as an effective tool in determining fetal head station during labor. Angle of progression (AOP), head-perineal distance (HPD) and head-symphysis distance (HSD) are reliable parameters to assess fetal head station during labor. The study aims were to evaluate how midwives can use AOP, HSD, HPD to assess the accuracy of digital vaginal exploration limited to the fetal head station. METHODS: Trained midwives for ultrasound analyses performed transperineal ultrasounds during the first stage of labor with 2D-convex probe in 62 pregnant women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation. Immediately before the intrapartum ultrasound, the birth attendant performed a digital examination to assess cervical dilatation and head station. The ultrasound scans were compared to the digital vaginal examination through the Tutschek's formula. RESULTS: AOP was wider in women who delivered vaginally without any complication if compared to "complicated delivery" group. HPD and HSD were greater in women who underwent an operative vaginal delivery or caesarean section. The vaginal exploration accuracy was 34%, but when ±1 cm was considered as tolerated, the overall accuracy was 74.19%. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives may include ultrasounds in their clinical practice after adequate training or under the supervision of an ultrasound professional as an adjunct tool during labor to evaluate its progress and prevent any deviation from physiology.

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders awareness in health professionals: implications for psychiatry.

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) are a plethora of malformative conditions leading to mental retardation that affect newborns and children who have been exposed to alcohol during pregnancy or breastfeeding. FASD is a relevant topic for public health in Europe: European area is first in ranking for alcohol use during pregnancy with a prevalence of 25.2%. Italy ranked third among European countries with higher prevalence of FASD (45.0 per 1000 population). Furthermore, FASD could still be underestimated because of numerous undiagnosed and misdiagnosed cases. Aims of the study were to briefly summarize existing evidences about FASD and its psychiatric aspects to assess knowledge, attitudes and practice towards alcohol drinking during pregnancy in an Italian sample of health care professionals in order to provide information about FASD prevention. An anonymous online questionnaire containing the AUDIT-C, T-ACE model and the Drinking Motive Questionnaire was sent to 400 Italian healthcare professionals and students. The survey included socio-demographic information, questions about drinking habits and about knowledge, attitude and practice towards alcohol assumption during pregnancy. Among 320 respondents, 96.3% were women. AUDIT-C revealed that 52.4% were low risk drinkers but 27.6% were hazardous drinkers. The 90.6% of participants denied to ever attended a course about the fetus damage induced by alcohol consumption during pregnancy but 91.3% were willing to participate to professional update initiatives on the topic. Only 19.1% of participants talk regularly about the deleterious effects for the fetus of prenatal alcohol drinking to women and only 51.1% advise the 'zero alcohol' policy. Around 41% of participants tolerates the assumption of low-alcohol beverages. No differences were found between no drinkers and low and hazardous drinkers. In conclusion, data show that only specific and continuing updating for health care professionals about drinking habits may have impactful actions to prevent gestational alcohol intake in order to prevent the main cause of mental retardation in western countries.