Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bull Cancer ; 110(12): 1251-1259, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37696744

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic approaches in Multiple Myeloma (MM) have considerably changed over the last few years, with effective oral chemotherapy and continuous treatment. In this context, the objective of this study was to examine the circuitry of an advanced practitioner nurse (APN)-led intervention that provided supportive care for MM patients treated with oral chemotherapy. METHODS: This population-based study was conducted at the hematology department - Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth (ICLN, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez), from April 2017 to September 2020. A follow-up program was established with a specialized APN in oncology. RESULTS: All APN interventions were recorded, representing 1240 phone calls and 162 consultations for 42 MM patients. Eighty-two calls were referred to the physician with 45 consultations triggered. Most of the calls were frequent within the few first months, with a high request for information and reassurance, especially for treatment-naive or relapsed patients. In our study, the APN was able to manage multiple side effects through care organization (i.e., hospitalizations, transfusions) and a careful coordination between the primary care team and the hospital. DISCUSSION: In order to respond to the high need for care pathway and safety improvement, especially in elderly population, we have initiated an original follow-up by an APN for MM patients treated with oral chemotherapy. While the role of APN has become prominent in the oncology field in recent years, its holistic approach has to be emphasized in further studies to bring a comprehensive perspective to health care coordination in the future.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Idoso , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção à Saúde
2.
Oncology ; 98(4): 216-221, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045903

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cancer and anti-cancer therapies are often associated with pain, loss of self-worth, anxiety, and depression. Alternative therapies such as art therapy are available to improve patients' quality of life, by reducing asthenia, depression, anxiety and pain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of art therapy, namely theatre and plastic art workshops, on well-being and quality of life of participants in the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute (France), between April 2018 and July 2018. Cancer patients followed at the Institute have been asked to participate in 10 2-h sessions, once a week, based on theatre and plastic art workshops. Self-report questionnaires were used to evaluate both psychological and quality of life domains, but also satisfaction and well-being, before (pre-test) and after the last session (early post-test), as well as 1-month post-experimentation (late post-test). RESULTS: Among the 14 patients who were enroled, the QLQ-C30 questionnaire revealed a pre-test median score of 50.0, an early post-test score of 51.5, and the late post-test revealed a score of 48.0. The anxiety test revealed median scores of 8.0 (pre-test), 6.0 (early post-test) and 6.0 (late post-test), respectively. The depression test reported median scores of 4.0 (pre-test), 5.0 (early post-test) and 6.0 (late post-test), respectively. The median well-being score difference observed between the beginning and the end of sessions is +2.13. The minimum satisfaction score observed is 3.50 out of 10, and the maximum is 10 out of 10. The median is between 7.00 and 10.00. CONCLUSIONS: Art therapy sessions had an impact on patients' welfare. We also reported a trend towards amelioration of quality of life that could probably be confirmed in a larger population, and potentially with a different methodology.


Assuntos
Arteterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
3.
Oncology ; 97(1): 18-25, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31132779

RESUMO

PURPOSE: It is usual for cancer patients to use complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) and yet the literature evaluating their efficacy in cancer patients is very limited. The objective of the present study was to report on the nature, frequency of use, and patient-reported outcome of CAMs in a single-center study. METHODS: All the consecutive patients treated between November 2017 and June 2018 at the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute (France) were screened. Their reasons for using CAMs and their usage habits were collected. Patients evaluated their benefit. RESULTS: Of the 209 patients screened, 200 patients were included. CAMs ranged from osteopathy, homeopathy, acupuncture, healing touch, magnetism, naturopathy, suction cups, Chinese medicine, reflexology, to hypnosis. CAMs were widely used (n = 166, 83%), the first being osteopathy (n = 99, 49.5%), the second homeopathy (n = 78, 39.0%), and finally acupuncture (n = 76, 38.0%). Whatever the CAM, high satisfaction rates were reported (median satisfaction: 61-81%). CAMs were mainly used to prevent/treat side effects of anticancer treatments (81.2% for healing touch), increase well-being (55.4% for naturopathy), improve the immune system (16.9% for homeopathy), and treat cancer (n = 3, 5.1% for homeopathy). Patients could easily consider using CAMs, as up to 50.8% would have accepted a consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for using CAMs differed among patients. They praised CAMs and kept asking for more information although there is limited evidence about their efficacy in the literature. Thus, prospective randomized controlled trials exploring the safety and efficacy of CAMs in cancer patients are needed.


Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Terapias Complementares/métodos , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Terapias Complementares/psicologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Homeopatia/métodos , Humanos , Hipnose/métodos , Masculino , Massagem/métodos , Naturologia/métodos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Bull Cancer ; 106(5): 479-491, 2019 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023481

RESUMO

Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) play more and more a significant role both in France and all over the world. Yet, their definition and their role in cancer treatments legitimately raise concerns. This article aims at establishing a picture of the CAMs admitted by the French Medical Board as well as those which are new or in common medical practices in France. We start with a brief reminder of their origin, their status and how they are used. Then, we review the literature about some of the best clinical trials using CAMs in cancer patients. To finish, we try to understand what makes CAMs so thrilling, but also why they create controversy and which common points they may have with conventional medicine.


Assuntos
Terapias Complementares , Neoplasias/terapia , Terapia por Acupuntura , Homeopatia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA