Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Health Promot ; 31(4): 325-332, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26730554

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We combined data from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection (NBCCEDP) and Well-Integrated Screening and Evaluation for Women Across the Nation (WISEWOMAN) programs in South Carolina to assess whether cancer screening outcomes in NBCCEDP impacted participation in WISEWOMAN lifestyle interventions, and whether the status of WISEWOMAN baseline risk factors (obesity, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and smoking) determined subsequent completion of lifestyle interventions. DESIGN: Case-control. SETTING: Three WISEWOMAN implementation sites in South Carolina. SUBJECTS: The study comprised 7841 NBCCDEP participants in three WISEWOMAN program sites. The two programs serve financially disadvantaged women. MEASURES: Outcome measures were participation in WISEWOMAN lifestyle interventions and completion of lifestyle interventions. The main predictor measures were cancer screening outcomes and baseline chronic disease risk factors. Covariate measures included age, race, body mass index, smoking status, and education. ANALYSIS: We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the odds of participation in and completion of WISEWOMAN lifestyle interventions. RESULTS: The association between cancer screening outcome and participation in WISEWOMAN lifestyle interventions among NBCCEDP participants differed significantly by education and smoking status. Among smokers or highly educated women, having an outcome of cancer or precancerous lesion through the NBCCEDP screening compared to normal screening outcomes was significantly associated with participation in lifestyle interventions, with odds ratios of 2.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-6.58) for highly educated women and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.00-3.31) for smokers. Similarly, smokers or diabetics were more likely than nonsmokers or nondiabetics, respectively, to complete lifestyle interventions. CONCLUSION: Nonsmokers and women with lower education in NBCCEDP may need additional navigation to lifestyle interventions in an integrated program implementation approach to improve participation in and completion of WISEWOMAN interventions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde/etnologia , Promoção da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Fatores Etários , Índice de Massa Corporal , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/etnologia , South Carolina , População Branca , Saúde da Mulher
2.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 19(4): 300-7, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23381113

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Rigorous outcome evaluation is essential to monitor progress toward achieving goals and objectives in comprehensive cancer control plans (CCCPs). OBJECTIVE: This report describes a systematic approach for an initial outcome evaluation of a CCCP. DESIGN: Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention evaluation framework, the evaluation focused on (1) organizing cancer plan objectives by anatomic site and risk factors, (2) rating each according to clarity and data availability, (3) the subsequent evaluation of clearly stated objectives with available outcome data, and (4) mapping allocation of implementation grants for local cancer control back to the CCCP objectives. SETTING: South Carolina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation outcomes included (1) a detailed account of CCCP objectives by topic area, (2) a systematic rating of level of clarity and availability of data to measure CCCP objectives, (3) a systematic assessment of attainment of measurable objectives, and (4) a summary of how cancer control grant funds were allocated and mapped to CCCP objectives. RESULTS: A system was developed to evaluate the extent to which cancer plan objectives were measurable as written with data available for monitoring. Twenty-one of 64 objectives (33%) in the South Carolina's CCCP were measurable as written with data available. Of the 21 clear and measurable objectives, 38% were not met, 38% were partially met, and 24% were met. Grant allocations were summarized across CCCP chapters, revealing that prevention and early detection were the most heavily funded CCCP areas. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation highlights a practical, rigorous approach for generating evidence required to monitor progress, enhance planning efforts, and recommend improvements to a CCCP.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Administração em Saúde Pública/métodos , Financiamento Governamental/organização & administração , Prioridades em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Objetivos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/normas , Administração em Saúde Pública/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Alocação de Recursos/organização & administração , South Carolina , Governo Estadual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA