RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Medicine reviews are an opportunity to identify and address inappropriate prescribing. The aim of this study was to explore changes in benzodiazepine use among older Australians following a medicine review. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective observational cohort study using linked administrative data. METHODS: We used Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims from a random 10% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We identified people aged 65 years or older who received a medicine review in 2013-14 and were using benzodiazepines at the time of review. We identified a propensity score matched comparison cohort of those using benzodiazepines who did not receive a review. Two outcome measures were used: any benzodiazepine use and changes to the quantity of benzodiazepines dispensed (diazepam equivalents) from baseline to 90 and 180 days following a medicine review. RESULTS: We identified 4002 people using benzodiazepines on the day of their medicine review, of whom approximately one-third discontinued benzodiazepines within 90 days (29.7%) and 180 days (36.4%;) after the review. We observed a similar discontinuation rate in the comparison group (32.6%, p = 0.006; and 38.0%, p = 0.12, respectively). In people who were dispensed lower quantities of benzodiazepines (less than 250 mg of diazepam equivalents in the 90 days before the medicine review), we found that 50.3% ceased using benzodiazepines or used lower quantities (measured as diazepam equivalents) following the medicine review (28.7% and 19.7% respectively). We also observed a reduction in the quantities used in people where initial exposure was high (3.4% ceased; 59.4% decreased). We observed a similar change in volume within the matched comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Medicine reviews are not associated with any additional reduction in benzodiazepine use among older adults, up to 180 days after review, beyond what was observed in the general population.