The effects of pelvic floor muscle therapy on symptoms, voiding, and pelvic floor muscle activity parameters in children with overactive bladder.

INTRODUCTION: Refractory overactive bladder (OAB) in children can be treated with second line modalities such as as biofeedback, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS), and botulinum toxin. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT) on symptoms, bladder capacity, uroflowmetry, and pelvic floor muscle activity (PFMA) in children with resistant OAB or dysfunctional voiding (DV) with associated seconder bladder overactivity (DV/SBO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 children with resistant OAB were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as: group-1 pure OAB and group-2 DV/SBO. Children were evaluated with voiding diary, uroflowmetry-EMG, PFMA before and after treatment. All patients were treated with PFMT. RESULTS: Urgency cured or improved in 12 of 17 (71%) of children in group-1 and in six of seven (86%) children in group-2 (P < 0.0001 and 0.031, respectively). Other symptoms cured or improved with 64%-100% recovery rates in group-1 and 50%-80% in group-2. Maximum voided volume (maxVV) in voiding diary increased from 81.6 to 150.9 mL in group-1 and from 115.6 to 175.7 mL in group-2 (P < 0.0001 and 0.063, respectively). Mean work value of PFMA increased and mean rest value of PFMA decreased significantly (P < 0.0001, 0.018 and P = 0.002 and 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: The measurement of PFMA in children with refractory OAB or DV/SBO gives information on the strength and endurance of PFMs. In children with refractory OAB or DV/SBO, biofeedback-assisted PFMT provides symptomatic improvement and increases functional bladder capacity.

Management of abnormal postvoid residual urine in children with dysfunctional voiding.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of biofeedback therapy on the residual urine volume in children with dysfunctional voiding. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in children with dysfunctional voiding associated with abnormal postvoid residual urine (PVR) from June 2002 to 2007. The children were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with standard urotherapy combined with biofeedback therapy and group 2 was treated with only standard urotherapy. The outcomes of uroflow-electromyography pattern, urinary tract infection (UTI), and PVR were recorded before and at the end of sixth month of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were enrolled in this study. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 62 and 32 patients, respectively. The voiding pattern became normal in 80.6% (50/62) and 56.2% (18/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The PVR resolved in 40 of 62 (64.5%) patients in group 1 and in 11 of 32 (34.4%) children in group 2. Before the treatment, UTI was noted in 22.5% of patients (14/62) in group 1 and 21.8% of patients (7/32) in group 2. After the treatment, UTI was observed in 3.2% of patients (2/62) and in 9.3% (3/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although both treatment modalities changed the voiding pattern, rate of febrile UTI, and PVR positively, these outcomes were better in a combination group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of standard urotherapy with the biofeedback therapy improved the results significantly.

Effect of biofeedback treatment on spinning top urethra in children with voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Spinning top urethra (STU) deformity arises secondary to detrusor instability, leading to an increase in the intravesical pressure against a closed sphincter. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of biofeedback treatment on STU in children with dysfunctional voiding. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with STU and voiding dysfunction were enrolled in this study. The patients divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 49) were treated with simple bladder retraining with timed voiding, and group 2 (n = 72) were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 and 12 month later to determine the status of the STU after both therapies. RESULTS: The patient age range was 5 to 13 years (mean 8.1 +/- 1.9) in group 1 and 5 to 13 years (mean 8.2 +/- 1.7) in group 2. Group 1 consisted of 41 girls and 8 boys; group 2 consisted of 63 girls and 9 boys. Voiding cystourethrography revealed vesicoureteral reflux in 39 and 59 children in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The improvement rates of the biofeedback therapy in children with STU and vesicoureteral reflux were significantly greater than the children treated with timed voiding at 6 months and 1-year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For children admitted to urology clinics with urinary infection or complaints thought to be an unstable urinary bladder, proximal urethral dilation called STU is detected at a high frequency. It should be remembered that this situation can be related to vesicoureteral reflux and urinary bladder instability. Biofeedback training is a simple, effective, and well-tolerated treatment modality for these children.

Results of biofeedback treatment on reflux resolution rates in children with dysfunctional voiding and vesicoureteral reflux.

OBJECTIVES: It is well known that a relationship exists between vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and dysfunctional voiding, and the spontaneous resolution rate in older children is lower than the rate in younger children. In this study, we analyzed our experience with biofeedback treatment in older children with confirmed voiding dysfunction and VUR and investigated the effect of this treatment on the reflux resolution rates in these children. METHODS: A total of 78 children, 5 to 14 years old (mean age 9), with voiding dysfunction and VUR detected by voiding cystourethrography were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 months after completion of the biofeedback program to determine the reflux status. The treatment results were also documented as subjective and objective improvements. RESULTS: The reflux in 98 units (20 bilateral) was grade 1 in 26, grade 2 in 32, grade 3 in 28, and grade 4 in 12. At 6 months of follow-up, VUR had resolved on voiding cystourethrography in 62 units (63%), the grade had improved in 28 units (29%), and the reflux had remained unchanged in 8 units (8%). Among the older children treated with biofeedback, we also observed improvements in nocturnal enuresis (82%), daytime wetting (70%), constipation (78%), frequency (76%), infrequency (64%), urgency (71%), staccato voiding (81%), flattened voiding (81%), bladder overactivity (82%), detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (77%), spinning top urethra (67%), and urinary tract infection (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy is applicable in older children with dysfunctional voiding and VUR and yields greater resolution rates than the historical resolution rates.

The effect of biofeedback treatment on voiding and urodynamic parameters in children with voiding dysfunction.

PURPOSE: We studied the effects of biofeedback treatment on voiding and urodynamic parameters in children with voiding dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 188 children between June 1998 and November 2003. Biofeedback was performed with a urodynamics processor that enables simultaneous recording of urine flow and electromyography, and visual display of flow/electromyography activity. At the beginning of the study this treatment was performed once weekly. After patients understood the concept and performed homework regularly sessions were scheduled at 3 to 4-week intervals and continued for 6 months. All children were evaluated at 6 months and again at 2 years after completing biofeedback training. RESULTS: The number of the children completing biofeedback was 168 (89.4%). Improvement was obtained in all parameters, ranging from 59.2% to 87.8% at 6 months. Maximum improvement was acquired with flattened voiding in 65 of 74 children (87.8%), whereas the least improvement was acquired with daytime wetting in 58 of 98 children (59.2%). These improvements continued at 2-year followup, and ranged from 53.1% to 87.3%. While the rate of improvement for nocturnal enuresis, staccato voiding, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection had increased, the remaining parameters had decreased at 2-year followup. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback training is a simple, effective and well tolerated treatment modality in children for various parameters resulting from bladder dysfunction. Motivation and willingness to participate in biofeedback treatment are important selection criteria.