Treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumors with electrochemotherapy using intralesional bleomycin.

BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is performed by locally administering a chemotherapeutic agent in combination with electric pulses. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of ECT. In these initial trials, the drug was administered intravenously, followed by administration of electric pulses directly to the tumor. This study was initiated to determine whether an intralesional injection of the drug in combination with electric pulses could provide an improved result. A group of 34 patients was studied. METHODS: The dose of intralesional bleomycin was based on tumor volume. This was followed 10 minutes later by 6 or 8 99-microsec pulses of electricity at an amplitude of 1.3 kV/cm. Both the bleomycin and the electric pulses were administered after 1% lidocaine with epinephrine solution was injected around the treatment site. RESULTS: All patients responded to the treatment. Responses were observed in 142 (99%) of 143 metastatic nodules or primary tumors within 12 weeks, with complete responses observed in 130 (91%) of the nodules. No complete responses were observed in nodules treated with bleomycin only or electric pulses only. Random biopsies confirmed the clinical findings. All patients tolerated the procedure well, and no significant side effects were noted. Muscle contraction was evident during administration of each electric pulse but promptly subsided after the pulse. CONCLUSIONS: ECT was shown to be an effective local treatment for cutaneous malignancies. The results suggest that ECT may have a tissue-sparing effect and result in minimal scarring. ECT may be a suitable alternative therapy for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma, local or regional recurrent melanoma, and other skin cancers.

Phase I/II trial for the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumors using electrochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a process that causes a transient increase in the permeability of cell membranes. It can be used to increase the intracellular concentration of chemotherapeutic agents in tumor cells (electrochemotherapy; ECT). A clinical study was initiated to determine if this mode of treatment would be effective against certain primary and metastatic cutaneous malignancies. A group of six patients, three with malignant melanoma, two with basal cell carcinoma, and one with metastatic adenocarcinoma, were enrolled in the study. the treatment was administered in a two-step process. METHODS: Each patient received a 10 unit/m2 dose of bleomycin administered intravenously at 1 to 1.5 units/minute. This was followed by eight 99 microsecond pulses at an amplitude of 1.3 kV/cm administered directly to the tumors 5 to 15 minutes after the bleomycin was completely infused. Pulses were administered after the injection of 1% lidocaine solution around the treatment site. RESULTS: Two of three melanoma patients had objective responses. In these two patients, five of six treated tumors decreased in size, and three completely responded. Untreated tumors displayed continued growth. Objective responses were observed in both basal cell carcinoma (BCC) patients. One patient had partial responses in both treated tumors. The other patient had one of four primary BCCs respond completely, and the remaining three respond partially. Patients with metastatic breast adenocarcinoma showed complete responses in both treated nodules after ECT. All patients tolerated the treatment well with no residual effects from the electric pulses. CONCLUSIONS: ECT was an effective local treatment in the majority of nodules treated. The results thus far are very encouraging and the study is being continued.

A randomized prospective comparison of intermittent methotrexate, methotrexate with leucovorin, and a methotrexate combination in head and neck cancer.

A randomized prospective clinical trial involved 259 cases of advanced recurrent Stage III and IV epidermoid cancers of the head and neck. The cases were randomized among three treatment programs evaluating two dose schedules and a combination treatment of methotrexate. The treatments consisted of: weekly methotrexate, biweekly methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (ML), and biweekly ML combined with cyclophosphamide and cytosine arabinoside (MLCC). Equivalent overall drug-related toxicity was produced with a 5% drug-related fatality rate. Methotrexate alone produced significantly more skin and mucosal toxicity, and the combination (MLCC) resulted in more hematologic toxicity than other treatments. Complete and partial objective responses were achieved in 26%, 24%, and 18% by each treatment. Methotrexate alone produced a median duration of response and 105 days compared with 42 and 49 days from the other treatments. Duration of response was significantly longer and survival was better in the methotrexate-alone group. Response was markedly stage dependent; 40% of Stage III patients achieved response, whereas only 17% of Stage IV patients responded. Presence of visceral metastases decreased response rates and the likelihood of response was particularly compromised by pulmonary metastatic spread; only seven of 54 such patients responded. Decreased survival was related to non-ambulatory performance status, disease-free intervals of less than one year and weight loss. Survival differences between Stage III and IV patients could not be shown. This study demonstrates the therapeutic superiority of weekly i.v. treatment with methotrexate but failed to support claims of an improved therapeutic index for high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue. As the only randomized prospective clinical trial of chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer, this study reinforces the weekly i.v. schedule of methotrexate as the standard against which other drug schedules and drug combinations should be compared.