Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 70(4): 617-626, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29400009

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the character and composition of the 2015 US adult rheumatology workforce, evaluate workforce trends, and project supply and demand for clinical rheumatology care for 2015-2030. METHODS: The 2015 Workforce Study of Rheumatology Specialists in the US used primary and secondary data sources to estimate the baseline adult rheumatology workforce and determine demographic and geographic factors relevant to workforce modeling. Supply and demand was projected through 2030, utilizing data-driven estimations regarding the proportion and clinical full-time equivalent (FTE) of academic versus nonacademic practitioners. RESULTS: The 2015 adult workforce (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) was estimated to be 6,013 providers (5,415 clinical FTE). At baseline, the estimated demand exceeded the supply of clinical FTE by 700 (12.9%). By 2030, the supply of rheumatology clinical providers is projected to fall to 4,882 providers, or 4,051 clinical FTE (a 25.2% decrease in supply from 2015 baseline levels). Demand in 2030 is projected to exceed supply by 4,133 clinical FTE (102%). CONCLUSION: The adult rheumatology workforce projections reflect a major demographic and geographic shift that will significantly impact the supply of the future workforce by 2030. These shifts include baby-boomer retirements, a millennial predominance, and an increase of female and part-time providers, in parallel with an increased demand for adult rheumatology care due to the growing and aging US population. Regional and innovative strategies will be necessary to manage access to care and reduce barriers to care for rheumatology patients.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Mão de Obra em Saúde/tendências , Avaliação das Necessidades/tendências , Reumatologistas/tendências , Reumatologia/tendências , Idoso , Área Programática de Saúde , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/tendências , Reumatologistas/provisão & distribuição , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 20(11): 1905-11, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16234962

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: We compared combination treatment with teriparatide plus raloxifene with teriparatide alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Markers of bone formation and spine BMD increased similarly with teriparatide alone and combination therapy. However, combination therapy induced a significantly smaller increase in bone resorption versus teriparatide alone and significantly increased total hip BMD versus baseline. INTRODUCTION: The effects of combining two approved treatments for osteoporosis with different modes of action were examined by comparing teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] monotherapy with combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 6-month randomized, double-blind trial comparing teriparatide plus raloxifene (n = 69) versus teriparatide plus placebo (n = 68) was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. RESULTS: Bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [PINP]) increased similarly in both treatment groups. However, the increase in bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTx]) in the combination group was significantly smaller than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.015). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased 5.19 +/- 0.67% from baseline in the teriparatide-alone group. In the combination group, lumbar spine (6.19 +/- 0.65%), femoral neck (2.23 +/- 0.64%), and total hip (2.31 +/- 0.56%) BMD significantly increased from baseline to study endpoint, and the increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.04). In the teriparatide-alone group, mean serum calcium levels increased from baseline to endpoint (0.30 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001), whereas mean serum phosphate remained unchanged. In the combination group, mean serum calcium was unchanged, and mean serum phosphate decreased (-0.20 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint. Changes in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.004) were significantly different between treatment groups. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to teriparatide alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy increased bone formation to a similar degree as teriparatide alone. However, the increase in bone resorption was significantly less and total hip BMD significantly increased for combination therapy compared with teriparatide alone. Combination treatment with raloxifene may thus enhance the bone forming effects of teriparatide. Further studies over longer treatment duration that include fracture endpoints are necessary to fully ascertain the clinical significance of combination raloxifene plus teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapêutico , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cálcio/sangue , Cálcio/urina , Colágeno/sangue , Colágeno Tipo I , Creatina/urina , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Peptídeos/sangue , Fósforo/sangue , Fósforo/urina , Pró-Colágeno/sangue , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/farmacologia , Teriparatida/efeitos adversos , Teriparatida/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ácido Úrico/sangue , Ácido Úrico/urina , Vômito/induzido quimicamente
3.
Clin Geriatr Med ; 18(3): 529-55, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12424871

RESUMO

Osteoporosis is a major clinical problem in older women and men. Almost any bone can fracture as a result of the increased bone fragility of osteoporosis. These fractures are associated with higher health care costs, physical disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Because the incidence of osteoporotic fracture increases with advancing age, measures to diagnose and prevent osteoporosis and its complications assume a major public health concern. BMD is a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for fracture, to make therapeutic decisions, and to monitor therapy. Several other modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for osteoporosis have also been identified. Treatment of potentially modifiable risk factors along with exercise and calcium and vitamin D supplementation forms an important adjunct to pharmacologic management of osteoporosis. Improved household safety can reduce the risk of falls. Hip protectors have been found to be effective in nursing home population. The pharmacologic options include bisphosphonates, HRT, SERMs and calcitonin. PTH had received FDA advisory committee approval. Alendronate has been approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men, and other treatments for men are under evaluation.


Assuntos
Ácido Etidrônico/análogos & derivados , Osteoporose/terapia , Idoso , Alendronato/uso terapêutico , Ácido Etidrônico/uso terapêutico , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/prevenção & controle , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/terapia , Ácido Risedrônico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA