Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Is Cure a Possibility?

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is an increasingly common finding in gastric carcinoma. Previously, patients were treated as terminal, and median survival was poor. The use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this context is still highly debatable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes associated with CRS and HIPEC, and define prognostic factors for cure, if possible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with gastric carcinomatosis from five French institutions who underwent combined complete CRS and HIPEC and had a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included in this study. Cure was defined as a disease-free interval of more than 5 years from the last treatment until the last follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC from 1989 to 2009, 59 had a completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS) of 0 (complete macroscopic resection), and the median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score was 6. Mitomycin C was the most commonly used drug during HIPEC (88 %). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 18 %, with nine patients still disease-free at 5 years, for a cure rate of 11 %. All 'cured' patients had a PCI score below 7 and a CCS of 0. Factors associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis were synchronous resection (p = 0.02), a lower PCI score (p = 0.12), and the CCS (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The cure rate of 11 % for patients with gastric carcinomatosis who are deemed terminal emphasizes that CRS and HIPEC should be considered in highly selected patients (low disease extent and complete CRS).

Postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic vs open cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are considered the only curative treatment for many peritoneal surface malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of CRS combined with HIPEC by laparoscopy for patients with limited peritoneal disease and to compare postoperative outcomes with those for an open procedure. METHODS: Between January 2011 and November 2012, all patients with low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) or multicystic mesothelioma (MM) and limited peritoneal disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index [PCI] less than 10) underwent CRS and HIPEC by a laparoscopic approach. The study cohort was matched with a historical cohort of patients with the same characteristics (completeness of cytoreduction, HIPEC agent, PCI ± 11 and age ± 20 years) treated with CRS and HIPEC by laparotomy. RESULTS: Eight patients (five low-grade PMP and three MM) treated by a laparoscopic approach were compared to eight patients treated by laparotomy. All patients underwent complete cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC, and no conversion to laparotomy was needed. The median surgical length was 210 min (150-300) vs 240 (210-360), with a median hospital stay of 12 days (9-18) vs 19 (13-33). One patient had a postoperative complication (intraperitoneal haematoma treated by radiological drainage) vs four in the laparotomy group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic CRS combined with HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment of strictly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy and might reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a French multicentre retrospective cohort study of 566 patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite a high response rate to front-line therapy, prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remains poor. Approaches that combine Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been developed recently. The purpose of this study was to assess early and long-term survival in patients treated with this strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort multicentric study from French centres was performed. All consecutive patients with advanced and recurrent EOC treated with CRS and HIPEC were included. RESULTS: The study included 566 patients from 13 centres who underwent 607 procedures between 1991 and 2010. There were 92 patients with advanced EOC (first-line treatment), and 474 patients with recurrent EOC. A complete cytoreductive surgery was performed in 74.9% of patients. Mortality and grades 3 to 4 morbidity rates were 0.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The median overall survivals were 35.4 months and 45.7 months for advanced and recurrent EOC, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with chemosensitive and with chemoresistant recurrence. Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) that evaluated disease extent was the strongest independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival in all groups. CONCLUSION: For advanced and recurrent EOC, curative therapeutic approach combining optimal CRS and HIPEC should be considered as it may achieve long-term survival in patients with a severe prognosis disease, even in patients with chemoresistant disease. PCI should be used for patient's selection.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is GLUT1 expression a major prognostic factor? A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare primary peritoneal malignancy. Its prognosis has been improved by an aggressive locoregional treatment combining extensive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prognostic factors are currently poorly defined for this disease but are essential if treatment is to be standardized. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with DMPM, who were considered preoperatively to be candidates for CRS and HIPEC between June 1998 and August 2010 at our institution, were selected for this study. Medical records and histopathological features were retrospectively reviewed and 24 clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical parameters were assessed for their association with overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The following factors were significantly associated with overall survival by univariate analysis: predominant histological growth pattern in the epithelioid areas, nuclear grooves in the epithelioid areas, atypical mitoses, and calretinin and GLUT1 expression by immunohistochemistry in the epithelioid areas. Expression of the facilitative glucose transporter protein GLUT1 in the epithelioid areas was the only factor independently associated with overall survival by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: GLUT1 expression appears to be an indicator of poor prognosis in DMPM. Standard histological classification of DMPM may not be adequate to select patients for aggressive locoregional treatments, such as CRS and HIPEC. Multicenter validation of the prognostic factors identified in this preliminary study is needed to refine patient selection for potential cure.