Cooling and hemodynamic management in heatstroke: practical recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Although rapid cooling and management of circulatory failure are crucial to the prevention of irreversible tissue damage and death in heatstroke, the evidence supporting the optimal cooling method and hemodynamic management has yet to be established. METHODS: A systematic review of all clinical studies published in Medline (1966 to 2006), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature) (1982 to 2006), and Cochrane Database was performed using the OVID interface without language restriction. Search terms included heatstroke, sunstroke, and heat stress disorders. RESULTS: Fourteen articles reported populations subjected to cooling treatment for classic or exertional heatstroke and included data on cooling time, neurologic morbidity, or mortality. Five additional articles described invasive monitoring with central venous or pulmonary artery catheters. The four clinical trials and 15 observational studies covered a total of 556 patients. A careful analysis of the results obtained indicated that the cooling method based on conduction, namely immersion in iced water, was effective among young people, military personnel, and athletes with exertional heatstroke. There was no evidence to support the superiority of any one cooling technique in classic heatstroke. The effects of non-invasive, evaporative, or conductive-based cooling techniques, singly or combined, appeared to be comparable. No evidence of a specific endpoint temperature for safe cessation of cooling was found. The circulatory alterations in heatstroke were due mostly to a form of distributive shock associated with relative or absolute hypovolemia. Myocardial failure was found to be rare. CONCLUSION: A systematic review of the literature failed to identify reliable clinical data on the optimum treatment of heatstroke. Nonetheless, the findings of this study could serve as a framework for preliminary recommendations in cooling and hemodynamic management of heatstroke until more evidence-based data are generated.

Glucocorticoids do not protect against the lethal effects of experimental heatstroke in baboons.

The mortality and neurological morbidity in heatstroke have been attributed to the host's inflammatory responses to heat stress, suggesting that anti-inflammatory therapy may improve outcome. We tested the hypothesis that a high dose of dexamethasone protects baboons against the lethal effects of heatstroke. Ten anesthetized baboons (Papio hamadryas) were assigned randomly to dexamethasone (n = 5) or control group (n = 5). Dexamethasone (2 mg/kg i.v.) was administered in four divided doses every 6 h starting immediately before heat stress and continuing during cooling. All animals were heat-stressed in a prewarmed neonatal incubator at 44 degrees C to 47 degrees C until systolic blood pressure fell less than 90 mmHg and then cooled passively at the ambient temperature. Mortality and neurological morbidity were noted, and biochemical markers of tissue injury/organ dysfunction were determined. Circulating interleukin (IL) 6 and complement components (C3 and C4) were measured sequentially. All heat-stressed animals had systemic inflammation indicated by increased plasma IL-6 and decreased C3 and C4 levels. Dexamethasone attenuated the complement system activation and maintained a higher plasma concentration of IL-6, with a significant augmentation of arterial blood pressure. Dexamethasone did not prevent the occurrence of severe heatstroke but unexpectedly aggravated significantly the tissue injury and multiorgan system dysfunction. Two animals (40%) in the control group and one in the steroid group survived (P > 0.05). Dexamethasone failed to protect the baboons from the lethal effects of heatstroke. These results do not support clinical testing of corticosteroids as beneficial in preventive or therapeutic strategies for the treatment of heatstroke in humans.