Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies have reported encouraging outcomes for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare standard-dose chemotherapy with the same therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes after primary breast surgery or patients with four or more positive lymph nodes after four cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive eight cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were stratified by stage and randomly assigned to receive two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support or no additional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was planned for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and chest wall radiotherapy was planned for all. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (48 after primary surgery and 30 after primary chemotherapy) were registered. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to FAC and 39 to FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there have been 41 relapses. In intention-to-treat analyses, estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 62% and 48% for FAC and FAC/high-dose chemotherapy, respectively (P =.35), and 3-year survival rates were 77% and 58%, respectively (P =.23). Overall, there was greater and more frequent morbidity associated with high-dose chemotherapy than with FAC; there was one septic death associated with high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: No relapse-free or overall survival advantage was associated with the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and morbidity was increased with its use. Thus, high-dose chemotherapy is not indicated outside a clinical trial.

Suppression of tumorigenesis by transcription units expressing the antisense E6 and E7 messenger RNA (mRNA) for the transforming proteins of the human papilloma virus and the sense mRNA for the retinoblastoma gene in cervical carcinoma cells.

Human cervical carcinoma cell lines that harbor human papilloma virus (HPV) have been reported to express HPV E6 and E7 proteins at least in the beginning stages if not at all stages of the disease. The HPV E6 and E7 proteins bind to and inactivate the products of the p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor genes, which thereby allow the cervical carcinoma cells to circumvent the action of these tumor suppressor genes. We observed that the introduction of the antisense HPV 18 E6 and E7 sequences, as well as a sense cDNA for the human wild-type Rb gene into a human cervical carcinoma cell line (HeLa), which is positive for the HPV 18 provirus, decreased the in vitro and in vivo growth rate of the transfected cells if both antisense transcripts for the HPV 18 E6 and E7 and sense transcripts for human Rb were expressed. In addition, overexpression of a complementary DNA (cDNA) for the Rb messenger RNA was sufficient to slow the proliferation of HeLa cells, and the level of Rb cDNA expression was correlated with the degree to which the rate of growth of the tumor was slowed. The results of our experiments show that the presence of HPV E6 and E7 proteins and the resultant inactivation of Rb in cervical carcinoma cells contributes to the neoplastic phenotype even in highly evolved cervical carcinoma cell lines such as HeLa, which have been derived from a cervical carcinoma patient at an advanced stage of the disease process. These data suggest that the HPV proteins play a role not only at the beginning of cervical cancer, but also at advanced stages of this disease. These experiments may lead to genetic approaches to the control of this disease that involve antisense sequences that downregulate the E6 and E7 genes or lead to expression of the Rb gene.

Low-dose non-glycosylated rhGM-CSF is effective for the treatment of delayed hematopoietic recovery after autologous marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Twenty-six patients with hematologic malignancies (20) or solid tumors (six) were treated with non-glycosylated rhGM-CSF (E. coli) for delayed hematopoietic recovery (granulocytes < 0.1 x 10(9)/l on day 21 or < 0.5 x 10(9)/l on day 28) after autologous marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Median pretreatment granulocytes were 0.1 x 10(9)/l (range 0-0.4 x 10(9)/l). Treatment with rhGM-CSF was initiated at 60-250 micrograms/m2 subcutaneously daily with dose escalation every 7 days if there was no response. Within 14 days, 21 (84%) of the 25 evaluable patients achieved granulocytes > 0.5 x 10(9)/l and 17 (68%) had granulocytes > 1.0 x 10(9)/l. For those who responded within 14 days, granulocytes were > 0.5 x 10(9)/l at a median of 3 days (range 1-13) and > 1.0 x 10(9)/l at 6 days (range 2-12). Sixteen of the 23 patients receiving an initial rhGM-CSF dose of 60-125 micrograms/m2 achieved granulocytes > 1.0 x 10(9)/l. Three patients discontinued use of rhGM-CSF because of toxicity, and four patients never recovered despite use of rhGM-CSF doses as high as 1000 micrograms/m2. Graft failure-related mortality was 16% at 4 months after transplantation. These results demonstrate that relatively low doses of non-glycosylated rhGM-CSF administered subcutaneously daily can be used to promote granulocyte recovery in patients with delayed engraftment after autologous transplantation. No beneficial effects were seen on red cell or platelet recovery.