Pain scores and local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal pathologies.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine gel compared with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) with lidocaine for transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal pathologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 was given 10 mL of 2% lidocaine gel intrarectally 10 minutes before the biopsy. Group 2 was given 10 mL of intrarectal 40% DMSO with an amount of lidocaine equal to that in the lidocaine gel 10 minutes before the procedure. The degree of pain was rated by patients using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: The pain scores for probe insertion were significantly lower for group 2 (3.15 +/- 1.41) than for group 1 (4.58 +/- 160) (P = 0.01). No significant differences were found between the pain scores of the two groups for biopsy-needle insertion (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Dimethylsulfoxide with lidocaine instilled into the rectum is a simple, safe, rapid-acting, and effective method of anesthesia delivery before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal pathologies.

Effect of biofeedback treatment on spinning top urethra in children with voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Spinning top urethra (STU) deformity arises secondary to detrusor instability, leading to an increase in the intravesical pressure against a closed sphincter. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of biofeedback treatment on STU in children with dysfunctional voiding. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with STU and voiding dysfunction were enrolled in this study. The patients divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 49) were treated with simple bladder retraining with timed voiding, and group 2 (n = 72) were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 and 12 month later to determine the status of the STU after both therapies. RESULTS: The patient age range was 5 to 13 years (mean 8.1 +/- 1.9) in group 1 and 5 to 13 years (mean 8.2 +/- 1.7) in group 2. Group 1 consisted of 41 girls and 8 boys; group 2 consisted of 63 girls and 9 boys. Voiding cystourethrography revealed vesicoureteral reflux in 39 and 59 children in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The improvement rates of the biofeedback therapy in children with STU and vesicoureteral reflux were significantly greater than the children treated with timed voiding at 6 months and 1-year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For children admitted to urology clinics with urinary infection or complaints thought to be an unstable urinary bladder, proximal urethral dilation called STU is detected at a high frequency. It should be remembered that this situation can be related to vesicoureteral reflux and urinary bladder instability. Biofeedback training is a simple, effective, and well-tolerated treatment modality for these children.

Results of biofeedback treatment on reflux resolution rates in children with dysfunctional voiding and vesicoureteral reflux.

OBJECTIVES: It is well known that a relationship exists between vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and dysfunctional voiding, and the spontaneous resolution rate in older children is lower than the rate in younger children. In this study, we analyzed our experience with biofeedback treatment in older children with confirmed voiding dysfunction and VUR and investigated the effect of this treatment on the reflux resolution rates in these children. METHODS: A total of 78 children, 5 to 14 years old (mean age 9), with voiding dysfunction and VUR detected by voiding cystourethrography were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 months after completion of the biofeedback program to determine the reflux status. The treatment results were also documented as subjective and objective improvements. RESULTS: The reflux in 98 units (20 bilateral) was grade 1 in 26, grade 2 in 32, grade 3 in 28, and grade 4 in 12. At 6 months of follow-up, VUR had resolved on voiding cystourethrography in 62 units (63%), the grade had improved in 28 units (29%), and the reflux had remained unchanged in 8 units (8%). Among the older children treated with biofeedback, we also observed improvements in nocturnal enuresis (82%), daytime wetting (70%), constipation (78%), frequency (76%), infrequency (64%), urgency (71%), staccato voiding (81%), flattened voiding (81%), bladder overactivity (82%), detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (77%), spinning top urethra (67%), and urinary tract infection (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy is applicable in older children with dysfunctional voiding and VUR and yields greater resolution rates than the historical resolution rates.

Comparing two local anesthesia techniques for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream compared with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with lidocaine during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: Of 167 patients, 85 received 10 g of EMLA cream (EMLA group) and 82 received 10 g of 40% DMSO (DMSO group) with an amount of lidocaine equal to that in the lidocaine gel, applied to the skin of the flank at the area of entry of the shock wave marked by the urologist. A second-generation lithotriptor Siemens Lithostar was used. The degree of pain was rated by the patients using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: In 80 patients in the EMLA group (94%), the entire procedure was performed with no, minor, or tolerable pain after the application of EMLA cream (pain score 5.2 +/- 1.3). In 5 EMLA patients (6%), EWSL was interrupted because of intolerable pain. Of the 82 DMSO patients, 80 (98%) underwent the entire procedure with no, minor, or tolerable pain after the application of DMSO with lidocaine (pain score 3.7 +/- 1.1). In 2 DMSO patients (2%), EWSL was interrupted because of intolerable pain. The pain scores were significantly lower for the DMSO group than for the EMLA group (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have indicated that the pain scores were significantly lower for the DMSO group than for the EMLA group. In addition to the local anesthetic effect of DMSO, diuretic, anti-inflammatory, muscle relaxant, and hydroxyl radical scavenger effects can be important for patients undergoing ESWL. These effects should be evaluated with new studies of patients undergoing ESWL.