Time independence of the prognostic impact of tumor cell detection in the bone marrow of primary breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Tumor cell detection (TCD) in bone marrow is an outstanding prognostic factor in breast cancer. There is only one other study that has investigated more than 300 patients with a median follow-up of more than 5 years (J. L. Mansi et al., Lancet, 354:197-202, 1999). We report data from 727 patients with a median follow-up period of 6.5 years. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a prospective study, intraoperatively aspirated bone marrow was screened for micrometastatic cancer cells. We used an immunocytological method (monoclonal mucin antibody 2E11; the avidin-biotin complex method). RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the patients were TCD positive. Sixty percent of the patients with distant metastases were tumor cell positive (155 of 258 patients). Forty-nine percent of the patients with positive TCD developed distant metastases (155 of 315 patients). TCD was an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcome after a median follow-up time of 6.5 years. The prognostic impact of TCD and tumor size remains constant with the time, whereas the impact of grading and progesterone receptor on risk seems to decrease with longer follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: TCD remains an independent prognostic factor The impact of TCD does not change with longer follow-up time. TCD is a reliable prognostic factor and provides important information about the process of metastasis.

[Therapeutic value of aredia in treatment of breast carcinoma]. / Der therapeutische Wert von Aredia in der Behandlung des Mammakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Like other metastases, bone metastases in breast cancer patients are not only a sign of the incurable nature of the underlying disease, but are also associated with specific complications. In particular, bone pain and pathological fractures impair the quality of life of those affected. Any treatment concept must therefore place the highest priority on preventing or reducing skeletal complications. THERAPY: There are 2 treatment options--local and systemic. Local therapy includes radiotherapy as well as surgical and orthopedic measures. The 4 pillars of systemic treatment are hormone therapy and chemotherapy, antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates and treatment with centrally and/or peripherally acting analgesics. A precondition for successful treatment is close cooperation between gynecologists, medical/clinical oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons/orthopedists, pain specialists and endocrinologists (in the presence of a hypercalcemic syndrome). CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer associated solely with osseous metastasis may survive for a number of years. It is therefore all the more important to start appropriate therapeutic measures in good time. Bisphosphonates play a particularly valuable role, since their main effect lies in the prevention of skeletal complications. Rather than replacing antineoplastic therapy, this class of substances supplements other treatments. Once started, bisphosphonate therapy should be given life-long, even in the event of osseous progression.

Bisphosphonates and the prevention of metastasis: first evidences from preclinical and clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates have been used successfully for many years in the treatment of hypercalcemia and to reduce skeletal-related complications of metastases. In the first years of bisphosphonate use, the efficacy of these substances was thought to lie purely in the inhibition of osteoclasts. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that an antitumor effect also may play a role. As well as having an apoptotic and antiproliferative effect on osteoclasts, bisphosphonates may exert a similar influence on macrophages and tumor cells. METHODS: The current investigation summarizes all results published to date that deal with the potential antitumor properties of the bisphosphonates. On the one hand, these include results from basic research into the action mechanism and preventative models in animals. In addition, the results of initial clinical experience with metastasis prophylaxis with bisphosphonates in breast carcinoma patients are presented and interpreted. RESULTS: Improvements in the survival time of certain subpopulations have been found in many Phase III studies with bisphosphonates to date, both in the setting of metastatic breast carcinoma and in multiple myeloma. Some preclinical studies showed that down-regulation of bone metabolism by bisphosphonates is associated with a lower incidence of bone metastases and destruction in animals, whereas activation is correlated with a higher number of metastases. However, varying results were found in animal experiments with regard to the effect of bisphosphonates on the incidence and growth pattern of nonosseous metastases. The results of three randomized studies in patients with primary breast carcinoma in which patients received 1600 mg clodronate orally have now been evaluated and presented. All three studies arrived at different results. Because the dose was identical in all three studies, the differing results can only be either random or methodologic (inclusion criteria, sample size, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results are very promising but need confirmation in further studies. At the moment, we have more open than answered questions. First, it is unclear whether this type of adjuvant therapy with bisphosphonates should be given continually by the oral route, or whether an intravenous interval therapy could produce the same results. It is also uncertain whether the doses used in a palliative setting are optimal or whether lower doses might also suffice. The optimum period of adjuvant treatment is also subject to debate. What is clear, however, is that confirmation of the initial clinical results will open a new chapter in the treatment of malignant tumors.

Treatment of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer: bisphosphonates.

Like other metastases, bone metastases in breast cancer patients are not only a sign of the incurable nature of the underlying disease, but are also associated with specific complications. In particular, bone pain and pathological fractures impair the quality of life of those affected. Any treatment concept must, therefore, place the highest priority on preventing or reducing skeletal complications. There are two treatment options--local and systemic. Local therapy includes radiotherapy as well as surgical and orthopedic measures. The four pillars of systemic treatment are hormone therapy, chemotherapy, antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates, and treatment with centrally and/or peripherally acting analgesics. A precondition for successful treatment is close cooperation between medical/clinical oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons/orthopedists, gynecologists, pain specialists, and endocrinologists (in the presence of a hypercalcemic syndrome). Patients with breast cancer associated solely with osseous metastasis may live for a number of years. It is, therefore, all the more important to start appropriate therapeutic measures early. Bisphosphonates play a particularly valuable role, since their main effect lies in the prevention of skeletal complications. Rather than replacing antineoplastic therapy, this class of substances supplements other treatments. Once started, bisphosphonate therapy should be given for the remainder of the patient's life, even in the event of osseous progression.

Serum bone sialoprotein in patients with primary breast cancer is a prognostic marker for subsequent bone metastasis.

Bone sialoprotein (BSP) is a noncoflagenous bone matrix protein that is important for both mineralization and cell-cell interactions. Tissue studies in primary breast cancers have shown that immunohistochemical expression of BSP is associated with a high incidence of bone metastases in the course of the disease. We used a RIA to investigate the importance of serum BSP as a marker for subsequent bone metastases. Between 1994 and 1996, preoperative blood samples were collected from 388 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer and from 30 control patients with benign breast disease. Serum BSP concentrations were measured in a blinded fashion by RIA. The cutoff for elevated serum BSP values was 24 ng/ml, ie., two SDs above the normal mean value. Serum BSP was correlated with the risk of metastasis and analyzed with regard to its prognostic value. After a median follow-up period of only 20 months, 28 patients had developed metastases. Fourteen patients had bone metastases only, 9 visceral metastases only, and 5 a combination of osseous and visceral metastases. Of the 19 women with skeletal metastases, 17 had preoperative serum BSP values in excess of 24 ng/ml (median BSP values: 48.3 ng/ml for isolated metastatic bone disease, 30.6 ng/ml for combined metastases), whereas none of the women with visceral metastases only had elevated serum BSP concentrations (median BSP value: 12.3 ng/ml). The median serum BSP value in the control group (benign breast disease) was 8.8 ng/ml serum BSP; levels correlated with the size of the primary tumor, but not with any other prognostic factors. Using a multivariate regression analysis, serum BSP was found to be the most important independent prognostic factor for the development of skeletal metastasis (P < 0.001; relative risk, 94); its specificity was 96.7%, and its sensitivity was 89.5%. Our study shows that patients with preoperatively elevated serum BSP levels are at high risk of subsequent bone metastases in the first years after primary surgery. The mechanism of BSP in the pathogenesis of skeletal metastases is unclear. Because BSP contains an integrin recognition sequence, its expression in tumor cells may facilitate their adhesion to the bone surface. However, it is possible that a proportion of circulation BSP is derived from normal or tumor-induced bone turnover. Breast cancer patients with elevated serum BSP levels may benefit from osteoprotective adjuvant therapy with bisphosphonates.

[Bisphosphonates in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer-- pathophysiology, animal models, and clinical experiences]. / Bisphosphonate in der adjuvanten Therapie des Mammakarzinoms-- Pathophysiologie, Tiermodelle und erste klinische Erfahrungen.

Bisphosphonates have been used successfully for many years in the treatment of hypercalcemia and to reduce skeletal-related complications of metastases. Their mechanism of action is based on alterations of the microenvironment of metastatic cells (apoptosis of osteoclasts, effects on adhesion molecules, etc.). Animal experiments have repeatedly shown that early use of bisphosphonates can prevent the occurrence of new metastases, an effect that is enhanced by cytotoxic therapy. Initial results from two clinical trials are now available that confirm this prophylactic effect in patients with breast cancer. About 700 women received 1,600 mg of clodronate per day orally for 2 years, and 700 women were randomized to a control group. A significant reduction in bone metastases was seen in both studies, and one study also showed a reduction in the occurrence of visceral metastases.