The Basophil Activation Test Can Be of Value for Diagnosing Immediate Allergic Reactions to Omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used to treat gastrointestinal diseases. Incidence of hypersensitivity reactions to PPIs has risen, likely because of increased consumption. Their diagnosis is difficult, with skin tests (STs) presenting low sensitivity, making it necessary to perform drug provocation tests (DPTs). The value of in vitro tests for the diagnosis of immediate reaction to PPI is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the diagnostic value of the basophil activation test (BAT) in a group of patients diagnosed with immediate allergy to omeprazole. METHODS: The study included 42 patients with confirmed immediate allergic reactions to omeprazole confirmed by positive ST results or DPT results and 22 age- and sex-matched subjects tolerant to PPIs. BAT was performed with omeprazole, pantoprazole, and lansoprazole using CD63 and CD203c as activation markers. RESULTS: ST sensitivity was 66.7% with a specificity of 100%. BAT using CD63 with a stimulation index of more than 2 as positive revealed a sensitivity of 73.8%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 66.7%. BAT was positive in 57.1% of patients with negative ST result, and thus by combining ST and BAT we can correctly diagnose 85.7% of patients with immediate allergy to omeprazole. CONCLUSION: BAT represents a complementary tool for inclusion in the allergological workup for patients allergic to omeprazole. When combined with ST, it can be of value to guide the clinician as to whether to perform a DPT.

Nasal inflammatory mediators and specific IgE production after nasal challenge with grass pollen in local allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence exists of a new form of local allergic rhinitis (LAR) with local production of specific IgE (sIgE) and a positive response to nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) in patients previously diagnosed with idiopathic rhinitis. However, the immunologic mechanisms involved are still poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We explored the involvement of nasal sIgE, eosinophil, and mast cell activation in the response to NAPT with grass pollen (NAPT-grass) in a group of patients already classified with LAR. METHODS: Out-of-spring NAPT-grass was performed in 30 patients with LAR and 30 healthy controls. Nasal symptoms, acoustic rhinometry, and nasal lavage were performed at baseline and 15 minutes and 1, 6, and 24 hours post-NAPT. Tryptase, eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), and total and sIgE to grass pollen were measured in nasal lavage by immunoassays. RESULTS: NAPT-grass was positive in all patients with LAR. We detected significant increases of tryptase and ECP in 40% and 43%, respectively, at 15 minutes and 1, 6, and 24 hours post-NAPT compared with baseline (P < .05). sIgE was increased in 30%, with significant increases at 1 and 6 hours (P < .05) and 24 hours (P = .002) post-NAPT. The maximum release of tryptase was detected 15 minutes after NAPT, whereas the maximum release of ECP and sIgE was detected 24 hours after challenge. NAPT-grass was negative in all healthy controls, with no increase in tryptase, ECP, total IgE, or sIgE. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that patients with LAR had local production of sIgE and mast cell/eosinophil activation induced by nasal exposure to grass pollen.