Abnormal auditory N100 amplitude: a heritable endophenotype in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands.

BACKGROUND: N100 evoked potential amplitude and gating abnormalities have been widely observed in schizophrenia patients. However, previous studies have been inconclusive as to whether similar deficits are present in unaffected family members. The Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) is a multisite National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) initiative examining neurocognitive and neurophysiological measures as endophenotypes for genetic studies of schizophrenia. We report initial results from the COGS dataset of auditory N100 amplitude and gating as candidate endophenotypes. METHODS: Evoked potential data were acquired from 142 schizophrenia probands, 373 unaffected first-degree relatives, and 221 community comparison subjects (CCS), using an auditory paired-click stimulation paradigm. Amplitude of the N100 response to each click and the click 2/click 1 ratio were dependent variables. Heritability was estimated based on kinships using Solar v.2.1.2. Group differences were examined after subjects were categorized as either "broad" or "narrow," based on the presence (broad) or absence (narrow) of nonpsychotic psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Heritability estimates were .40 and .29 for click1 and click2 amplitudes and .22 for the ratio. Broad and narrow patients both had impaired click 1 amplitudes. Broad relatives, but not narrow relatives, exhibited similar impairments. There were no group differences for either click 2 amplitude or the gating ratio. CONCLUSIONS: N100 amplitude is a heritable measure that is abnormal in patients and a subset of relatives for whom psychiatric comorbidity may be a genetically associated phenotype. Auditory N100 gating, although heritable, is less viable as a schizophrenia endophenotype.

Multi-site studies of acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition in humans: initial experience and methodological considerations based on studies by the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Startle and its inhibition by weak lead stimuli ("prepulse inhibition": PPI) are studied to understand the neurobiology of information processing in patients and community comparison subjects (CCS). PPI has a strong genetic basis in infrahumans, and there is evidence for its heritability, stability and reliability in humans. PPI has gained increasing use as an endophenotype to identify vulnerability genes for brain disorders, including schizophrenia. Genetic studies now often employ multiple, geographically dispersed test sites to accommodate the need for large and complex study samples. Here, we assessed the feasibility of using PPI in multi-site studies. METHODS: Within a 7-site investigation with multiple measures, the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia conducted a methodological study of acoustic startle and PPI in CCS. Methods were manualized, videotaped and standardized across sites with intensive in-person training sessions. Equipment was acquired and programmed at the "PPI site" (UCSD), and stringent quality assurance (QA) procedures were used. Testing was completed on 196 CCS over 2.5 years, with 5 primary startle dependent measures: eyeblink startle magnitude, habituation, peak latency, latency facilitation and PPI. RESULTS: Analyses identified significant variability across sites in some but not all primary measures, and determined factors both within the testing process and subject characteristics that influenced a number of test measures. QA procedures also identified non-standardized practices with respect to testing methods and procedural "drift", which may be particularly relevant to multi-site studies using these measures. CONCLUSION: With thorough oversight and QA procedures, measures of acoustic startle PPI can be acquired reliably across multiple testing sites. Nonetheless, even among sites with substantial expertise in utilizing psychophysiological measures, multi-site studies using startle and PPI as dependent measures require careful attention to methodological procedures.