Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991848

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Immune response stimulation may be an adjuvant to antimicrobial treatment. Here, we evaluated the impact of immune response modification by lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), combined with imipenem or ceftazidime, in murine models of peritoneal sepsis (PS) and pneumonia induced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: The imipenem and ceftazidime-susceptible strain (Pa39) and imipenem and ceftazidime-resistant strain (Pa238) were used. Ceftazidime pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined. The therapeutic efficacy and TNF-α and IL-10 levels were determined in murine models of PS and pneumonia induced by Pa39 and Pa238 and treated with LPC, imipenem or ceftazidime, alone or in combination. RESULTS: In the PS model, LPC+ceftazidime reduced spleen and lung Pa238 concentrations (-3.45 and -3.56log10CFU/g; P<0.05) to a greater extent than ceftazidime monotherapy, while LPC+imipenem maintained the imipenem efficacy (-1.66 and -1.45log10CFU/g; P>0.05). In the pneumonia model, LPC+ceftazidime or LPC+imipenem reduced the lung Pa238 concentrations (-2.37log10CFU/g, P=0.1, or -1.35log10CFU/g, P=0.75). For Pa39, no statistically significant difference was observed in the PS and pneumonia models between combined therapy and monotherapy. Moreover, LPC+imipenem and LPC+ceftazidime significantly decreased and increased the TNF-α and IL-10 levels, respectively, in comparison with the untreated controls and monotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the impact of immune response modification by LPC plus antibiotics on the prognosis of infections induced by ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa.


Assuntos
Pneumonia , Sepse , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Imunidade , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/farmacologia , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/uso terapêutico , Camundongos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Modelos Teóricos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 48(6): 661-665, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28128094

RESUMO

In this study, the efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in a murine model of foreign-body and systemic infection was compared. Two bacteraemic biofilm-producing MRSE strains were used (SE284 and SE385). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for strains SE284 and SE385, were, respectively, 0.25 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L for ceftaroline and 4 mg/L and 2 mg/L for vancomycin. The in vitro bactericidal activities of ceftaroline and vancomycin were evaluated using time-kill curves. A foreign-body and systemic infection model in neutropenic female C57BL/6 mice was used to ascertain in vivo efficacy. Animals were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 15) without treatment (controls) or treated with ceftaroline 50 mg/kg every 8 h or vancomycin 110 mg/kg every 6 h. In vitro, ceftaroline showed concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, whilst vancomycin presented time-dependent activity. In the experimental in vivo model, ceftaroline and vancomycin decreased the liver and catheter bacterial concentrations (P <0.05) and increased survival (P <0.05) for both strains. In conclusion, ceftaroline is as effective as vancomycin in the treatment of experimental foreign-body and systemic infection caused by biofilm-producing MRSE.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Animais , Carga Bacteriana , Biofilmes/efeitos dos fármacos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Corpos Estranhos/complicações , Resistência a Meticilina , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Distribuição Aleatória , Sepse/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento , Ceftarolina
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(7): 3920-4, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25896698

RESUMO

Due to the significant increase in antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii, immune system stimulation to block infection progression may be a therapeutic adjuvant to antimicrobial treatment. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), a major component of phospholipids in eukaryotic cells, is involved in immune cell recruitment and modulation. The aim of this study was to show if LPC could be useful for treating infections caused by A. baumannii. A. baumannii ATCC 17978 was used in this study. Levels of serum LPC and levels of the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1ß, and IL-10 were determined by spectrophotometric assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively, using a murine peritoneal sepsis model in which mice were inoculated with 5.3 log CFU/ml of A. baumannii. The therapeutic efficacy of LPC against A. baumannii in murine peritoneal sepsis and pneumonia models was assessed for 48 h after bacterial infection. At early time points in the murine model of peritoneal sepsis caused by A. baumannii, LPC was depleted and was associated with an increase of inflammatory cytokine release. Preemptive therapy with LPC in murine peritoneal sepsis and pneumonia models markedly enhanced spleen and lung bacterial clearance and reduced the numbers of positive blood cultures and the mouse mortality rates. Moreover, treatment with LPC reduced proinflammatory cytokine production. These data demonstrate that LPC is efficacious as a preemptive treatment in experimental models of peritoneal sepsis and pneumonia caused by A. baumannii.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/mortalidade , Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Citocinas/sangue , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Pulmão/microbiologia , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/sangue , Lisofosfatidilcolinas/farmacocinética , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Sepse/microbiologia , Baço/microbiologia
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 57(9): 4587-9, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23836165

RESUMO

The fitness and virulence costs associated with the clinical acquisition of colistin resistance by Acinetobacter baumannii were evaluated. The growth of strain CR17 (colistin resistant) was less than that of strain CS01 (colistin susceptible) when the strains were grown in competition (72-h competition index, 0.008). In a murine sepsis model, CS01 and CR17 reached spleen concentrations when coinfecting of 9.31 and 6.97 log10 CFU/g, respectively, with an in vivo competition index of 0.016. Moreover, CS01 was more virulent than CR17 with respect to mortality and time to death.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/veterinária , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Colistina/farmacologia , Aptidão Genética/efeitos dos fármacos , Sepse/veterinária , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/mortalidade , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Acinetobacter baumannii/patogenicidade , Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Feminino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Virulência
5.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 39(3): 251-4, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22154856

RESUMO

New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-1 (NDM-1)-producing Enterobacteriaceae have emerged as a global threat. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacies of colistin and tigecycline in an experimental model of pneumonia caused by NDM-1-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The susceptibilities of K. pneumoniae NDM, E. coli NDM and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29665 were determined using the broth microdilution technique. The pharmacokinetics of colistin and tigecycline in an experimental model of pneumonia were performed using immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. Mice were treated with colistin (60 mg/kg/day) or tigecycline (10 mg/kg/day). Mortality, bacteraemia and lung bacterial concentrations were recorded. The strains were susceptible to colistin and tigecycline. The ratio of area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) for colistin was 158.5 (all three strains) and that for tigecycline was 18.5 (K. pneumoniae NDM) and 37 (K. pneumoniae ATCC 29665 and E. coli NDM). In vivo, colistin decreased bacterial lung concentrations of K. pneumoniae NDM and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29665 by 1.16 log colony-forming units (CFU)/g and 2.23 logCFU/g, respectively, compared with controls (not significant). Tigecycline reduced K. pneumoniae NDM and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29665 load by 2.67 logCFU/g and 4.62 logCFU/g (P<0.05). Colistin and tigecycline decreased lung concentrations of E. coli NDM by 2.27 logCFU/g and 4.15 logCFU/g (P<0.05), respectively, compared with controls, and was more active than colistin (P<0.05). In conclusion, these results suggest that colistin is inappropriate for treating pneumonia due to NDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae and its efficacy was suboptimal against NDM-1-producing E. coli. A high tigecycline dose was efficacious for treating experimental pneumonia due to NDM-1-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae.


Assuntos
Colistina/análogos & derivados , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Klebsiella pneumoniae/patogenicidade , Minociclina/análogos & derivados , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Carga Bacteriana , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Colistina/farmacocinética , Colistina/farmacologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/enzimologia , Feminino , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimologia , Pulmão/microbiologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Minociclina/administração & dosagem , Minociclina/farmacocinética , Minociclina/farmacologia , Tigeciclina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA