Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 114, 2024 Feb 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321376

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Folic acid supplementation is recommended for reducing the risk of birth defects. We aimed to assess the protective association of periconception folic acid supplements with birth defects in real-world setting. METHODS: This prospective, population-based cohort study utilized national preconception registered data of married Chinese couples planning a pregnancy within 6 months between 2010 and 2012 in Mainland China. Participated women are freely provided folic acid starting 3 months before conception till 3 months after conception. Birth defects were self-reported at 42 days postpartumn followup. R software (v4.0.2) was applied for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Complete data of 567,547 couples with pregnancy outcomes and folic acid supplementation were extracted for final analysis. A total of 74.7% women were with folic acid supplementation, and 599 birth defects were self-reported. The odd of birth defects was lower among women taking folic acid compared to their counterparts not taking (0.102% vs 0.116%, P < 0.001). In the multiple logistic regression analyses, the odd of birth defects was lower among couples with maternal folic acid supplementation (OR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.66-0.95, P = 0.011), especially decreased odd of neural tube defects (NTDs) (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.39-0.82, P = 0.003). This association was confirmed by 1:4 and 1:10 case control analysis. Odds of birth defects were significantly lower among women with folic acid supplementation more than 3 months before pregnancy (P < 0.001), and moreover, the odds of cleft (P = 0.007) and NTDs (P = 0.007) were of notable decrease. CONCLUSION: This retrospective case cohort study provides programmatic evidence for public health strategy-making to for reducing the risk of NTDs and clefts.


Assuntos
Ácido Fólico , Defeitos do Tubo Neural , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais , China
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 15(3): e007923, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105177

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the most challenging public health problems worldwide. Previous studies suggested that the Songling Xuemaikang capsule (SXC)-a Chinese herbal formula-was effective for essential hypertension. However, the efficacy of SXC monotherapy for hypertension remains unclear. We aimed to compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety of SXC versus losartan in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial in China, patients 18 to 65 years of age with mild essential hypertension were randomly allocated to receive either SXC or losartan for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in sitting diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks, with a predefined noninferiority margin of -2.5 mm Hg. RESULTS: Of the 755 patients who entered a 2-week run-in period, 628 patients (327 women and 301 men; mean [SD] age, 52.6 [9.2] years) were randomly assigned to the SXC (n=314) or losartan (n=314) group. The primary analysis based on the intention-to-treat principle showed that the change in diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks was similar between the SXC and losartan groups (-7.9 [8.0] versus -8.1 [7.9]). The lower boundary of 95% CI (mean difference, -0.24 [95% CI, -1.51 to 1.03]) was above the margin of -2.5 mm Hg, showing noninferiority. Results were consistent with per-protocol analysis. SXC produced greater improvements in total hypertension symptom score (-5.7 [4.2] versus -5.0 [4.0]; P=0.020) and total cholesterol (-0.1 [1.0] versus 0.1 [1.2]; P=0.025). There were no differences between groups in the other BP and patient-reported outcomes. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SXC was well tolerated and demonstrated noninferior to losartan in BP lowering in patients with mild hypertension. SXC might be an alternative for mild hypertension, particularly for patients with a preference for natural medicine. REGISTRATION: URL: www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-16008108.


Assuntos
Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas , Hipertensão , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea , Método Duplo-Cego , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/efeitos adversos , Hipertensão Essencial/induzido quimicamente , Hipertensão Essencial/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Essencial/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Lactente , Losartan/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA