Effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation of quadriceps and calf muscles in patients with chronic heart failure.

PURPOSE: The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation of quadriceps and calf muscles on global exercise capacities, skeletal muscle metabolism, calf muscle volume, and cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS: Fourteen patients with chronic heart failure (mean age of 56.4 years +/- 9.1 SD; mean radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction of 22.3% +/- 8.8 SD) underwent 5 weeks (1 hour per day, 5 days per week) of low-frequency electrical stimulation of quadriceps and calf muscles. RESULTS: Low-frequency electrical stimulation was well tolerated. Exercise capacity and the calf muscles volumes increased significantly after rehabilitation in comparison with prior rehabilitation (the peak oxygen consumption increased from 17.2 mL/(kgmin) +/- 5.3 SD to 19.6 mL/(kgmin) +/- 5.9 SD; the anaerobic threshold increased from 12.3 mL/(kgmin) +/- 3.2 SD to 15.2 mL/(kgmin) +/- 3.3 SD; the 6-minute walking test increased from 419 m +/- 122 SD to 459 m +/- 114.3 SD; the gastrocnemius volume increased from 259.4 cm3 +/- 58 SD to 273.4 cm3 +/- 74 SD, and the soleus volume increased from 319 cm3 +/- 42.9 SD to 338 cm3 +/- 52.5 SD). The New York Heart Association class was improved after rehabilitation. The P-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of gastrocnemius muscle data were not significantly modified after rehabilitation, thereby inferring that no significant improvement of the muscle metabolism occurred. These data reinforce the hypothesis of an increased muscle mass during stimulation. It is noteworthy that the electrical stimulation did not increase cardiac output at any stage; an enormous asset in favor of this mode of rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that low-frequency muscular electrical stimulation is well tolerated, induces an increased exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure, without an undesirable increase in cardiac output.

Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations.

In this study, the metabolic performances of a new energy-storing foot (Proteor) and of the solid-ankle cushion heel (SACH) are compared. Twelve patients with traumatic below-knee amputations (mean age: 50.0 +/- 19.9 years) and 12 patients with vascular below-knee amputations (mean age: 73 +/- 7 years) were studied. Oxygen uptake (VO2) was measured in all the subjects on a walkway at a self-selected velocity; only the subjects with traumatic amputation were tested on a level treadmill (progressive speed: 2.4-4 and 6 km/h), and then in two randomized trials: incline (+5%) and decline walking treadmill test at 4 km/h. Vascular explorations were done in the vascular patients: distal pressure measurements, pulse plethysmography, transcutaneous oxygen tension. Free walking was improved in subjects with traumatic amputation using the energy-storing foot (+6%), with a better bioenergetic efficiency (0.24 +/- 0.4mL/kg.m vs 0.22 +/- 0.04mL/kg.m). However, in subjects with vascular amputation, this foot did not produce an increased free velocity nor an improved energy cost. During the level treadmill test, the traumatic amputee subjects showed a decrease of energy expenditure with the new prosthetic foot, more significant at sufficient speed (4 km/h): 17.00 +/- 3.42 vs 14.67 +/- 2.05 mL/kg/min (p < .05). The same effect is shown during the incline (19.31 +/- 2.80 vs 16.79 +/- 2.32 mL/kg/min-p < .02) and decline walking tests (14.13 +/- 3.64 vs 11.81 +/- 1.54mL/kg/min-p < .02). There is no significant difference in cardiocirculatory effects between the two types of prosthetic foot. Despite a lower velocity, the subjects with vascular amputation exceed 70% of the maximal heart rate, with the cardiocirculatory factor being the main cause of walking restriction. The energy-storing foot should be reserved for active and fast walkers, whereas the SACH foot seems more suitable for elderly patients with amputation with a slow walk.